Theorem tgcolg 25449

Description: We choose the notation (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) instead of "colinear" in order to avoid defining an additional symbol for colinearity because LineG is a common structure slot for other axiomatizations of geometry. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 25-May-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tglngval.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
tglngval.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
tglngval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
tglngval.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
tglngval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
tglngval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
tgcolg.z	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tgcolg	⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Proof of Theorem tgcolg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 477	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 = 𝑌)
2	1	olcd 408	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
3		tglngval.p	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
4		eqid 2622	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (dist‘𝐺) = (dist‘𝐺)
5		tglngval.i	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺)
6		tglngval.g	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
7	6	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
8		tgcolg.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
9	8	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
10		tglngval.x	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
11	10	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
12	3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11	tgbtwntriv2 25382	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑋))
13	1	oveq2d 6666	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍𝐼𝑋) = (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
14	12, 13	eleqtrd 2703	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌))
15	14	3mix2d 1237	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍)))
16	2, 15	2thd 255	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 = 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
17		simpr 477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
18	17	neneqd 2799	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌)
19		biorf 420	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 = 𝑌 → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
20	18, 19	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌))))
21		orcom 402	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑋 = 𝑌 ∨ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌)) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
22	20, 21	syl6bb 276	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
23		tglngval.l	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺)
24	6	adantr 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG)
25	10	adantr 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃)
26		tglngval.y	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
27	26	adantr 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑃)
28	8	adantr 481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → 𝑍 ∈ 𝑃)
29	3, 23, 5, 24, 25, 27, 17, 28	tgellng 25448	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
30	22, 29	bitr3d 270	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))
31	16, 30	pm2.61dane 2881	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐿𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌) ↔ (𝑍 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑋 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝑌) ∨ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑋𝐼𝑍))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∨ wo 383   ∧ wa 384   ∨ w3o 1036   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ≠ wne 2794  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  Basecbs 15857  distcds 15950  TarskiGcstrkg 25329  Itvcitv 25335  LineGclng 25336

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-trkgc 25347  df-trkgcb 25349  df-trkg 25352

This theorem is referenced by:  btwncolg1  25450  btwncolg2  25451  btwncolg3  25452  colcom  25453  colrot1  25454  lnxfr  25461  lnext  25462  tgfscgr  25463  tglowdim2l  25545  outpasch  25647