Theorem xpcan 5570

Description: Cancellation law for Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xpcan	⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem xpcan

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xp11 5569	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
2		eqid 2622	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐶
3	2	biantrur 527	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
4	1, 3	syl6bbr 278	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5		nne 2798	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
6		simpr 477	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝐴 = ∅)
7		xpeq2 5129	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × ∅))
8		xp0 5552	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐶 × ∅) = ∅
9	7, 8	syl6eq 2672	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = ∅)
10	9	eqeq1d 2624	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ ∅ = (𝐶 × 𝐵)))
11		eqcom 2629	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∅ = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅)
12	10, 11	syl6bb 276	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅))
13	12	adantl 482	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅))
14		df-ne 2795	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐶 = ∅)
15		xpeq0 5554	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐶 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅))
16		orel1 397	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐶 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐵 = ∅))
17	15, 16	syl5bi 232	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ 𝐶 = ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
18	14, 17	sylbi 207	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
19	18	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 = ∅))
20	13, 19	sylbid 230	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐵 = ∅))
21		eqtr3 2643	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 = ∅) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
22	6, 20, 21	syl6an 568	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
23	5, 22	sylan2b 492	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24		xpeq2 5129	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵))
25	23, 24	impbid1 215	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	4, 25	pm2.61dan 832	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ≠ ∅ → ((𝐶 × 𝐴) = (𝐶 × 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∨ wo 383   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ≠ wne 2794  ∅c0 3915   × cxp 5112

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125

This theorem is referenced by: (None)