Theorem bj-peano4 10750

Description: Remove from peano4 4338 dependency on ax-setind 4280. Therefore, it only requires core constructive axioms (albeit more of them). (Contributed by BJ, 28-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-peano4	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-peano4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3simpa 935	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω))
2		pm3.22 261	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω))
3		bj-nnen2lp 10749	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ω) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
4	1, 2, 3	3syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
5		sucidg 4171	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵)
6		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐵))
7	5, 6	syl5ibrcom 155	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
8		elsucg 4159	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
9	7, 8	sylibd 147	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴)))
10	9	imp 122	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
11	10	3adant1 956	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴))
12		sucidg 4171	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴)
13		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
14	12, 13	syl5ibcom 153	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵))
15		elsucg 4159	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐴 ∈ suc 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
16	14, 15	sylibd 147	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
17	16	imp 122	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
18	17	3adant2 957	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
19	11, 18	jca 300	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
20		eqcom 2083	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
21	20	orbi2i 711	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
22	21	anbi1i 445	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 = 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
23	19, 22	sylib 120	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
24		ordir 763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
25	23, 24	sylibr 132	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
26	25	ord 675	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → (¬ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
27	4, 26	mpd 13	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
28	27	3expia 1140	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
29		suceq 4157	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵)
30	28, 29	impbid1 140	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 661   ∧ w3a 919   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  suc csuc 4120  ωcom 4331

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-13 1444  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-nul 3904  ax-pr 3964  ax-un 4188  ax-bd0 10604  ax-bdor 10607  ax-bdn 10608  ax-bdal 10609  ax-bdex 10610  ax-bdeq 10611  ax-bdel 10612  ax-bdsb 10613  ax-bdsep 10675  ax-infvn 10736

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-rab 2357  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-nul 3252  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-uni 3602  df-int 3637  df-suc 4126  df-iom 4332  df-bdc 10632  df-bj-ind 10722

This theorem is referenced by: (None)