ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  eloprabi GIF version

Theorem eloprabi 5842
Description: A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
eloprabi.1 (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st𝐴)) → (𝜑𝜓))
eloprabi.2 (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st𝐴)) → (𝜓𝜒))
eloprabi.3 (𝑧 = (2nd𝐴) → (𝜒𝜃))
Assertion
Ref Expression
eloprabi (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝜃,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜒(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem eloprabi
Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 eqeq1 2087 . . . . . 6 (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
21anbi1d 452 . . . . 5 (𝑤 = 𝐴 → ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
323exbidv 1790 . . . 4 (𝑤 = 𝐴 → (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
4 df-oprab 5536 . . . 4 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
53, 4elab2g 2740 . . 3 (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)))
65ibi 174 . 2 (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
7 vex 2604 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 𝑥 ∈ V
8 vex 2604 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 𝑦 ∈ V
97, 8opex 3984 . . . . . . . . . . 11 𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
10 vex 2604 . . . . . . . . . . 11 𝑧 ∈ V
119, 10op1std 5795 . . . . . . . . . 10 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st𝐴) = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩)
1211fveq2d 5202 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (1st ‘(1st𝐴)) = (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
137, 8op1st 5793 . . . . . . . . 9 (1st ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑥
1412, 13syl6req 2130 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st𝐴)))
15 eloprabi.1 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st𝐴)) → (𝜑𝜓))
1614, 15syl 14 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑𝜓))
1711fveq2d 5202 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd ‘(1st𝐴)) = (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩))
187, 8op2nd 5794 . . . . . . . . 9 (2nd ‘⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩) = 𝑦
1917, 18syl6req 2130 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st𝐴)))
20 eloprabi.2 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st𝐴)) → (𝜓𝜒))
2119, 20syl 14 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜓𝜒))
229, 10op2ndd 5796 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (2nd𝐴) = 𝑧)
2322eqcomd 2086 . . . . . . . 8 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → 𝑧 = (2nd𝐴))
24 eloprabi.3 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑧 = (2nd𝐴) → (𝜒𝜃))
2523, 24syl 14 . . . . . . 7 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜒𝜃))
2616, 21, 253bitrd 212 . . . . . 6 (𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝜑𝜃))
2726biimpa 290 . . . . 5 ((𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
2827exlimiv 1529 . . . 4 (∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
2928exlimiv 1529 . . 3 (∃𝑦𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
3029exlimiv 1529 . 2 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
316, 30syl 14 1 (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 102  wb 103   = wceq 1284  wex 1421  wcel 1433  cop 3401  cfv 4922  {coprab 5533  1st c1st 5785  2nd c2nd 5786
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-13 1444  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964  ax-un 4188
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-eu 1944  df-mo 1945  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-sbc 2816  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-uni 3602  df-br 3786  df-opab 3840  df-mpt 3841  df-id 4048  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-cnv 4371  df-co 4372  df-dm 4373  df-rn 4374  df-iota 4887  df-fun 4924  df-fv 4930  df-oprab 5536  df-1st 5787  df-2nd 5788
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator