Theorem abrexco 6502

Description: Composition of two image maps C ( y ) and B ( w ). (Contributed by NM, 27-May-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
abrexco.1	|- B e. _V
abrexco.2	|- ( y = B -> C = D )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abrexco	|- { x | E. y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } x = C } = { x | E. w e. A x = D }

Distinct variable groups:   y, A, z   y, B, z   w, C   y, D   x, w, y   z, w

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, w)   B( x, w)   C( x, y, z)   D( x, z, w)

Proof of Theorem abrexco

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-rex 2918	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } x = C <-> E. y ( y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } /\ x = C ) )
2		vex 3203	. . . . . . . . 9 |- y e. _V
3		eqeq1 2626	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( z = y -> ( z = B <-> y = B ) )
4	3	rexbidv 3052	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( z = y -> ( E. w e. A z = B <-> E. w e. A y = B ) )
5	2, 4	elab 3350	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } <-> E. w e. A y = B )
6	5	anbi1i 731	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } /\ x = C ) <-> ( E. w e. A y = B /\ x = C ) )
7		r19.41v 3089	. . . . . . 7 |- ( E. w e. A ( y = B /\ x = C ) <-> ( E. w e. A y = B /\ x = C ) )
8	6, 7	bitr4i 267	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } /\ x = C ) <-> E. w e. A ( y = B /\ x = C ) )
9	8	exbii 1774	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } /\ x = C ) <-> E. y E. w e. A ( y = B /\ x = C ) )
10	1, 9	bitri 264	. . . 4 |- ( E. y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } x = C <-> E. y E. w e. A ( y = B /\ x = C ) )
11		rexcom4 3225	. . . 4 |- ( E. w e. A E. y ( y = B /\ x = C ) <-> E. y E. w e. A ( y = B /\ x = C ) )
12	10, 11	bitr4i 267	. . 3 |- ( E. y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } x = C <-> E. w e. A E. y ( y = B /\ x = C ) )
13		abrexco.1	. . . . 5 |- B e. _V
14		abrexco.2	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = B -> C = D )
15	14	eqeq2d 2632	. . . . 5 |- ( y = B -> ( x = C <-> x = D ) )
16	13, 15	ceqsexv 3242	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( y = B /\ x = C ) <-> x = D )
17	16	rexbii 3041	. . 3 |- ( E. w e. A E. y ( y = B /\ x = C ) <-> E. w e. A x = D )
18	12, 17	bitri 264	. 2 |- ( E. y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } x = C <-> E. w e. A x = D )
19	18	abbii 2739	1 |- { x | E. y e. { z | E. w e. A z = B } x = C } = { x | E. w e. A x = D }

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 384   = wceq 1483   E.wex 1704   e. wcel 1990   {cab 2608   E.wrex 2913   _Vcvv 3200

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-v 3202

This theorem is referenced by:  rankcf  9599  sylow1lem2  18014  sylow3lem1  18042  restco  20968