Theorem asclpropd 19346

Description: If two structures have the same components (properties), one is an associative algebra iff the other one is. The last hypotheses on 1_r can be discharged either by letting 𝑊 = V (if strong equality is known on ·_𝑠) or assuming 𝐾 is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jul-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
asclpropd.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
asclpropd.g	⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
asclpropd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
asclpropd.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
asclpropd.3	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
asclpropd.4	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
asclpropd.5	⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
asclpropd	⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐾   𝑥,𝐿,𝑦   𝑥,𝑃,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑊,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐹(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem asclpropd

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		asclpropd.5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)
2		asclpropd.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)𝑦))
3	2	oveqrspc2v 6673	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
4	3	anassrs 680	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) ∧ (1r‘𝐾) ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
5	1, 4	mpidan 704	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)))
6		asclpropd.4	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐿))
7	6	oveq2d 6666	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
8	7	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
9	5, 8	eqtrd 2656	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)) = (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
10	9	mpteq2dva 4744	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
11		asclpropd.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐹))
12	11	mpteq1d 4738	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))))
13		asclpropd.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺))
14	13	mpteq1d 4738	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑃 ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
15	10, 12, 14	3eqtr3d 2664	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾))) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿))))
16		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐾)
17		asclpropd.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝐾)
18		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐹) = (Base‘𝐹)
19		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)
20		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐾) = (1r‘𝐾)
21	16, 17, 18, 19, 20	asclfval 19334	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐾) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐹) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐾)(1r‘𝐾)))
22		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (algSc‘𝐿)
23		asclpropd.g	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐺 = (Scalar‘𝐿)
24		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ (Base‘𝐺) = (Base‘𝐺)
25		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿) = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)
26		eqid 2622	. . 3 ⊢ (1r‘𝐿) = (1r‘𝐿)
27	22, 23, 24, 25, 26	asclfval 19334	. 2 ⊢ (algSc‘𝐿) = (𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝐺) ↦ (𝑧( ·𝑠 ‘𝐿)(1r‘𝐿)))
28	15, 21, 27	3eqtr4g 2681	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (algSc‘𝐾) = (algSc‘𝐿))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990   ↦ cmpt 4729  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  Basecbs 15857  Scalarcsca 15944   ·_𝑠 cvsca 15945  1_rcur 18501  algSccascl 19311

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-slot 15861  df-base 15863  df-ascl 19314

This theorem is referenced by:  ply1ascl  19628