Theorem axdc3 9276

Description: Dependent Choice. Axiom DC1 of [Schechter] p. 149, with the addition of an initial value 𝐶. This theorem is weaker than the Axiom of Choice but is stronger than Countable Choice. It shows the existence of a sequence whose values can only be shown to exist (but cannot be constructed explicitly) and also depend on earlier values in the sequence. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Jan-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
axdc3.1	⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axdc3	⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑔‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔,𝑘   𝐶,𝑔,𝑘   𝑔,𝐹,𝑘

Proof of Theorem axdc3

Dummy variables 𝑛 𝑠 𝑡 𝑥 𝑦 𝑗 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		axdc3.1	. 2 ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V
2		feq1 6026	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ↔ 𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴))
3		fveq1 6190	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘∅) = (𝑠‘∅))
4	3	eqeq1d 2624	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ↔ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶))
5		fveq1 6190	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) = (𝑠‘suc 𝑗))
6		fveq1 6190	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝑡‘𝑗) = (𝑠‘𝑗))
7	6	fveq2d 6195	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) = (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)))
8	5, 7	eleq12d 2695	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗))))
9	8	ralbidv 2986	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗))))
10		suceq 5790	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → suc 𝑗 = suc 𝑘)
11	10	fveq2d 6195	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) = (𝑠‘suc 𝑘))
12		fveq2 6191	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝑠‘𝑗) = (𝑠‘𝑘))
13	12	fveq2d 6195	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) = (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))
14	11, 13	eleq12d 2695	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝑘 → ((𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) ↔ (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘))))
15	14	cbvralv 3171	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))
16	9, 15	syl6bb 276	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)) ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘))))
17	2, 4, 16	3anbi123d 1399	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → ((𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗))) ↔ (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))))
18	17	rexbidv 3052	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑡 = 𝑠 → (∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗))) ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))))
19	18	cbvabv 2747	. 2 ⊢ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} = {𝑠 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑠:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑠‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑠‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑠‘𝑘)))}
20		eqid 2622	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ↦ {𝑦 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ∣ (dom 𝑦 = suc dom 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ↾ dom 𝑥) = 𝑥)}) = (𝑥 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ↦ {𝑦 ∈ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ω (𝑡:suc 𝑛⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑡‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑛 (𝑡‘suc 𝑗) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑡‘𝑗)))} ∣ (dom 𝑦 = suc dom 𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ↾ dom 𝑥) = 𝑥)})
21	1, 19, 20	axdc3lem4 9275	1 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})) → ∃𝑔(𝑔:ω⟶𝐴 ∧ (𝑔‘∅) = 𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ ω (𝑔‘suc 𝑘) ∈ (𝐹‘(𝑔‘𝑘))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913  {crab 2916  Vcvv 3200   ∖ cdif 3571  ∅c0 3915  𝒫 cpw 4158  {csn 4177   ↦ cmpt 4729  dom cdm 5114   ↾ cres 5116  suc csuc 5725  ⟶wf 5884  ‘cfv 5888  ωcom 7065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949  ax-dc 9268

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-tr 4753  df-id 5024  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-om 7066  df-1o 7560

This theorem is referenced by:  axdc4lem  9277