Theorem dftpos3 7370

Description: Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 5122. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftpos3	⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Proof of Theorem dftpos3

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relcnv 5503	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ Rel ◡dom 𝐹
2		dmtpos 7364	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
3	2	releqd 5203	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ Rel ◡dom 𝐹))
4	1, 3	mpbiri 248	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → Rel dom tpos 𝐹)
5		reltpos 7357	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
6	4, 5	jctil 560	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹))
7		relrelss 5659	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((Rel tpos 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom tpos 𝐹) ↔ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
8	6, 7	sylib 208	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((V × V) × V))
9	8	sseld 3602	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → 𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V)))
10		elvvv 5178	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ ((V × V) × V) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩)
11	9, 10	syl6ib 241	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩))
12	11	pm4.71rd 667	. . . 4 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹)))
13		19.41vvv 1916	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹))
14		eleq1 2689	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹))
15		df-br 4654	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹)
16		vex 3203	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
17		brtpos 7361	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
18	16, 17	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩tpos 𝐹𝑧 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
19	15, 18	bitr3i 266	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)
20	14, 19	syl6bb 276	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
21	20	pm5.32i 669	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
22	21	3exbii 1776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
23	13, 22	bitr3i 266	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧))
24	12, 23	syl6bb 276	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → (𝑤 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)))
25	24	abbi2dv 2742	. 2 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)})
26		df-oprab 6654	. 2 ⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧)}
27	25, 26	syl6eqr 2674	1 ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  Vcvv 3200   ⊆ wss 3574  ⟨cop 4183   class class class wbr 4653   × cxp 5112  ^◡ccnv 5113  dom cdm 5114  Rel wrel 5119  {coprab 6651  tpos ctpos 7351

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-fv 5896  df-oprab 6654  df-tpos 7352

This theorem is referenced by:  tposoprab  7388