Theorem dmscut 31918

Description: The domain of the surreal cut operation is all separated surreal sets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dmscut	⊢ dom |s = <<s

Proof of Theorem dmscut

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmoprab 6741	. 2 ⊢ dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))} = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
2		df-scut 31899	. . . 4 ⊢ |s = (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No , 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))
3		df-mpt2 6655	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No , 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
4	2, 3	eqtri 2644	. . 3 ⊢ |s = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
5	4	dmeqi 5325	. 2 ⊢ dom |s = dom {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑐⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
6		df-sslt 31897	. . . . 5 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 ⊆ No ∧ 𝑏 ⊆ No ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 𝑥 <s 𝑦)}
7	6	relopabi 5245	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel <<s
8		19.42v 1918	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
9		ssltss1 31903	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ⊆ No )
10		vex 3203	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑎 ∈ V
11	10	elpw 4164	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ↔ 𝑎 ⊆ No )
12	9, 11	sylibr 224	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No )
13	12	pm4.71ri 665	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
14		vex 3203	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝑏 ∈ V
15	10, 14	elimasn 5490	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
16		df-br 4654	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s )
17	15, 16	bitr4i 267	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎}) ↔ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏)
18	17	anbi2i 730	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ (𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑎 <<s 𝑏))
19		riotaex 6615	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})) ∈ V
20		isset 3207	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})) ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))
21	19, 20	mpbi 220	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))
22	21	biantru 526	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
23	13, 18, 22	3bitr2i 288	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 <<s 𝑏 ↔ ((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ ∃𝑐 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
24	8, 23, 16	3bitr2ri 289	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)}))))
25	24	a1i 11	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊤ → (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∈ <<s ↔ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))))
26	7, 25	opabbi2dv 5271	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))})
27	26	trud 1493	. 2 ⊢ <<s = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 No ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ( <<s “ {𝑎})) ∧ 𝑐 = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝑎 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝑏)})))}
28	1, 5, 27	3eqtr4i 2654	1 ⊢ dom |s = <<s

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483  ⊤wtru 1484  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912  {crab 2916  Vcvv 3200   ⊆ wss 3574  𝒫 cpw 4158  {csn 4177  ⟨cop 4183  ∩ cint 4475   class class class wbr 4653  {copab 4712  dom cdm 5114   “ cima 5117  ‘cfv 5888  ℩crio 6610  {coprab 6651   ↦ cmpt2 6652   No csur 31793   <s cslt 31794   bday cbday 31795   <<s csslt 31896   |s cscut 31898

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-riota 6611  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-sslt 31897  df-scut 31899

This theorem is referenced by:  scutf  31919  madeval2  31936