| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > lssats2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A way to express atomisticity (a subspace is the union of its atoms). (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2.s | ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.n | ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) |
| lssats2.w | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| lssats2.u | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| lssats2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | simpr 477 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 2 | lssats2.w | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | |
| 3 | 2 | adantr 481 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 4 | lssats2.u | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | |
| 5 | eqid 2622 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊) | |
| 6 | lssats2.s | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) | |
| 7 | 5, 6 | lssel 18938 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 8 | 4, 7 | sylan 488 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) |
| 9 | lssats2.n | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) | |
| 10 | 5, 9 | lspsnid 18993 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑊)) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 11 | 3, 8, 10 | syl2anc 693 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 12 | sneq 4187 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → {𝑥} = {𝑦}) | |
| 13 | 12 | fveq2d 6195 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) = (𝑁‘{𝑦})) |
| 14 | 13 | eleq2d 2687 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦}))) |
| 15 | 14 | rspcev 3309 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑦})) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 16 | 1, 11, 15 | syl2anc 693 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| 17 | 16 | ex 450 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 18 | 2 | adantr 481 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) |
| 19 | 4 | adantr 481 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) |
| 20 | simpr 477 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) | |
| 21 | 6, 9, 18, 19, 20 | lspsnel5a 18996 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ⊆ 𝑈) |
| 22 | 21 | sseld 3602 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 23 | 22 | rexlimdva 3031 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝑈)) |
| 24 | 17, 23 | impbid 202 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 25 | eliun 4524 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘{𝑥})) | |
| 26 | 24, 25 | syl6bbr 278 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) |
| 27 | 26 | eqrdv 2620 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 (𝑁‘{𝑥})) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 384 = wceq 1483 ∈ wcel 1990 ∃wrex 2913 {csn 4177 ∪ ciun 4520 ‘cfv 5888 Basecbs 15857 LModclmod 18863 LSubSpclss 18932 LSpanclspn 18971 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-8 1992 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 ax-rep 4771 ax-sep 4781 ax-nul 4789 ax-pow 4843 ax-pr 4906 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-3an 1039 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-eu 2474 df-mo 2475 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ne 2795 df-ral 2917 df-rex 2918 df-reu 2919 df-rmo 2920 df-rab 2921 df-v 3202 df-sbc 3436 df-csb 3534 df-dif 3577 df-un 3579 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-nul 3916 df-if 4087 df-pw 4160 df-sn 4178 df-pr 4180 df-op 4184 df-uni 4437 df-int 4476 df-iun 4522 df-br 4654 df-opab 4713 df-mpt 4730 df-id 5024 df-xp 5120 df-rel 5121 df-cnv 5122 df-co 5123 df-dm 5124 df-rn 5125 df-res 5126 df-ima 5127 df-iota 5851 df-fun 5890 df-fn 5891 df-f 5892 df-f1 5893 df-fo 5894 df-f1o 5895 df-fv 5896 df-riota 6611 df-ov 6653 df-0g 16102 df-mgm 17242 df-sgrp 17284 df-mnd 17295 df-grp 17425 df-lmod 18865 df-lss 18933 df-lsp 18972 |
| This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |