Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > nss | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Negation of subclass relationship. Exercise 13 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18. (Contributed by NM, 25-Feb-1996.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
nss | ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | exanali 1786 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
2 | dfss2 3591 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | |
3 | 1, 2 | xchbinxr 325 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) |
4 | 3 | bicomi 214 | 1 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 384 ∀wal 1481 ∃wex 1704 ∈ wcel 1990 ⊆ wss 3574 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 |
This theorem is referenced by: grur1 9642 psslinpr 9853 reclem2pr 9870 mreexexlem2d 16305 prmcyg 18295 filconn 21687 alexsubALTlem4 21854 wilthlem2 24795 shne0i 28307 erdszelem10 31182 fundmpss 31664 relintabex 37887 ntrneineine1lem 38382 nssrex 39260 nssd 39288 nsssmfmbf 40987 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |