MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  numclwwlkovq Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem numclwwlkovq 27232
Description: Value of operation 𝑄, mapping a vertex 𝑣 and a positive integer 𝑛 to the not closed walks v(0) ... v(n) of length 𝑛 from a fixed vertex 𝑣 = v(0). "Not closed" means v(n) =/= v(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Sep-2018.) (Revised by AV, 30-May-2021.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
numclwwlk.v 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
numclwwlk.q 𝑄 = (𝑣𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})
Assertion
Ref Expression
numclwwlkovq ((𝑋𝑉𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋𝑄𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)})
Distinct variable groups:   𝑛,𝐺,𝑣,𝑤   𝑛,𝑁,𝑣,𝑤   𝑛,𝑉,𝑣   𝑛,𝑋,𝑣,𝑤
Allowed substitution hints:   𝑄(𝑤,𝑣,𝑛)   𝑉(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem numclwwlkovq
StepHypRef Expression
1 oveq1 6657 . . . 4 (𝑛 = 𝑁 → (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
21adantl 482 . . 3 ((𝑣 = 𝑋𝑛 = 𝑁) → (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
3 eqeq2 2633 . . . . 5 (𝑣 = 𝑋 → ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ↔ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑋))
4 neeq2 2857 . . . . 5 (𝑣 = 𝑋 → (( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣 ↔ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋))
53, 4anbi12d 747 . . . 4 (𝑣 = 𝑋 → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)))
65adantr 481 . . 3 ((𝑣 = 𝑋𝑛 = 𝑁) → (((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣) ↔ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)))
72, 6rabeqbidv 3195 . 2 ((𝑣 = 𝑋𝑛 = 𝑁) → {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)} = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)})
8 numclwwlk.q . 2 𝑄 = (𝑣𝑉, 𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑣 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑣)})
9 ovex 6678 . . 3 (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∈ V
109rabex 4813 . 2 {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)} ∈ V
117, 8, 10ovmpt2a 6791 1 ((𝑋𝑉𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑋𝑄𝑁) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑋 ∧ ( lastS ‘𝑤) ≠ 𝑋)})
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 196  wa 384   = wceq 1483  wcel 1990  wne 2794  {crab 2916  cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  cmpt2 6652  0cc0 9936  cn 11020   lastS clsw 13292  Vtxcvtx 25874   WWalksN cwwlksn 26718
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655
This theorem is referenced by:  numclwwlkqhash  27233  numclwwlk2lem1  27235  numclwlk2lem2f  27236  numclwlk2lem2f1o  27238
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator