Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > weisoeq | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two set-like well-ordered classes. Class version of wemoiso 7153. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
weisoeq | ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | id 22 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
2 | isocnv 6580 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐹 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) | |
3 | isotr 6586 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ ◡𝐹 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl2anr 495 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) |
5 | weniso 6604 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | 3expa 1265 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) |
7 | 4, 6 | sylan2 491 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) |
8 | simprl 794 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
9 | isof1o 6573 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | |
10 | f1of1 6136 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | |
11 | 8, 9, 10 | 3syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
12 | simprr 796 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
13 | isof1o 6573 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | |
14 | f1of1 6136 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | |
15 | 12, 13, 14 | 3syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
16 | f1eqcocnv 6556 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | |
17 | 11, 15, 16 | syl2anc 693 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) |
18 | 7, 17 | mpbird 247 | 1 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 384 = wceq 1483 I cid 5023 Se wse 5071 We wwe 5072 ◡ccnv 5113 ↾ cres 5116 ∘ ccom 5118 –1-1→wf1 5885 –1-1-onto→wf1o 5887 Isom wiso 5889 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-8 1992 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 ax-sep 4781 ax-nul 4789 ax-pow 4843 ax-pr 4906 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-3or 1038 df-3an 1039 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-eu 2474 df-mo 2475 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ne 2795 df-ral 2917 df-rex 2918 df-reu 2919 df-rmo 2920 df-rab 2921 df-v 3202 df-sbc 3436 df-csb 3534 df-dif 3577 df-un 3579 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-nul 3916 df-if 4087 df-sn 4178 df-pr 4180 df-op 4184 df-uni 4437 df-br 4654 df-opab 4713 df-mpt 4730 df-id 5024 df-po 5035 df-so 5036 df-fr 5073 df-se 5074 df-we 5075 df-xp 5120 df-rel 5121 df-cnv 5122 df-co 5123 df-dm 5124 df-rn 5125 df-res 5126 df-ima 5127 df-iota 5851 df-fun 5890 df-fn 5891 df-f 5892 df-f1 5893 df-fo 5894 df-f1o 5895 df-fv 5896 df-isom 5897 |
This theorem is referenced by: weisoeq2 6606 wemoiso 7153 oieu 8444 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |