Theorem difopab 4487

Description: The difference of two ordered-pair abstractions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Jan-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
difopab	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem difopab

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopab 4482	. . 3 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
2		reldif 4475	. . 3 ⊢ (Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → Rel ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 7	. 2 ⊢ Rel ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
4		relopab 4482	. 2 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}
5		sbcan 2856	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
6		sbcan 2856	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
7	6	sbcbii 2873	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]([𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
8		opelopabsb 4015	. . . . 5 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
9		vex 2604	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
10		sbcng 2854	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ V → ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓))
11	9, 10	ax-mp 7	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
12		vex 2604	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
13		sbcng 2854	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ V → ([𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓))
14	12, 13	ax-mp 7	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
15	14	sbcbii 2873	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥] ¬ [𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
16		opelopabsb 4015	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
17	16	notbii 626	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ¬ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜓)
18	11, 15, 17	3bitr4ri 211	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓)
19	8, 18	anbi12i 447	. . . 4 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦] ¬ 𝜓))
20	5, 7, 19	3bitr4ri 211	. . 3 ⊢ ((⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
21		eldif 2982	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ¬ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}))
22		opelopabsb 4015	. . 3 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦](𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓))
23	20, 21, 22	3bitr4i 210	. 2 ⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) ↔ ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)})
24	3, 4, 23	eqrelriiv 4452	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ∖ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)}

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  Vcvv 2601  [wsbc 2815   ∖ cdif 2970  ⟨cop 3401  {copab 3838  Rel wrel 4368

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-pow 3948  ax-pr 3964

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-fal 1290  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-eu 1944  df-mo 1945  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-sbc 2816  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-opab 3840  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370

This theorem is referenced by: (None)