ixxss1 - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

	Intuitionistic Logic Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > ixxss1		GIF version

Theorem ixxss1 8927

Description: Subset relationship for intervals of extended reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)

**Hypotheses**
Ref	Expression
ixxssixx.1	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
ixxss1.2	⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑇𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
ixxss1.3	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
ixxss1	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))

Distinct variable groups: 𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴 𝑤,𝐶,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑂,𝑥 𝑤,𝐵,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑃 𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧 𝑥,𝑆,𝑦,𝑧 𝑥,𝑇,𝑦,𝑧 𝑤,𝑊 Allowed substitution hints: 𝑃(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧) 𝑅(𝑤) 𝑆(𝑤) 𝑇(𝑤) 𝑂(𝑦,𝑧) 𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

**Proof of Theorem ixxss1**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ixxss1.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑃 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑇𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
2	1	elixx3g 8924	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ↔ ((𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) ∧ (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
3	2	simplbi 268	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*))
4	3	adantl 271	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*))
5	4	simp3d 952	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*)
6		simplr 496	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑊𝐵)
7	2	simprbi 269	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶))
8	7	adantl 271	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝐵𝑇𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶))
9	8	simpld 110	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐵𝑇𝑤)
10		simpll 495	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
11	4	simp1d 950	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
12		ixxss1.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))
13	10, 11, 5, 12	syl3anc 1169	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → ((𝐴𝑊𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑇𝑤) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤))
14	6, 9, 13	mp2and 423	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐴𝑅𝑤)
15	8	simprd 112	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤𝑆𝐶)
16	4	simp2d 951	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^*)
17		ixxssixx.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ^, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ^ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ^* ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∧ 𝑧𝑆𝑦)})
18	17	elixx1 8920	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ^ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
19	10, 16, 18	syl2anc 403	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑤 ∧ 𝑤𝑆𝐶)))
20	5, 14, 15, 19	mpbir3and 1121	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) ∧ 𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶)) → 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))
21	20	ex 113	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝑤 ∈ (𝐵𝑃𝐶) → 𝑤 ∈ (𝐴𝑂𝐶)))
22	21	ssrdv 3005	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐴𝑊𝐵) → (𝐵𝑃𝐶) ⊆ (𝐴𝑂𝐶))

Colors of variables: wff set class

Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ↔ wb 103 ∧ w3a 919 = wceq 1284 ∈ wcel 1433 {crab 2352 ⊆ wss 2973 class class class wbr 3785 (class class class)co 5532 ↦ cmpt2 5534 ℝ^*cxr 7152

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-13 1444 ax-14 1445 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 ax-sep 3896 ax-pow 3948 ax-pr 3964 ax-un 4188 ax-setind 4280 ax-cnex 7067 ax-resscn 7068

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-3an 921 df-tru 1287 df-fal 1290 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-eu 1944 df-mo 1945 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ne 2246 df-ral 2353 df-rex 2354 df-rab 2357 df-v 2603 df-sbc 2816 df-dif 2975 df-un 2977 df-in 2979 df-ss 2986 df-pw 3384 df-sn 3404 df-pr 3405 df-op 3407 df-uni 3602 df-br 3786 df-opab 3840 df-id 4048 df-xp 4369 df-rel 4370 df-cnv 4371 df-co 4372 df-dm 4373 df-iota 4887 df-fun 4924 df-fv 4930 df-ov 5535 df-oprab 5536 df-mpt2 5537 df-pnf 7155 df-mnf 7156 df-xr 7157

This theorem is referenced by: iooss1 8939

W3C validator