Theorem ordpwsucexmid 4313

Description: The subset in ordpwsucss 4310 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid.1	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordpwsucexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝜑,𝑥

Proof of Theorem ordpwsucexmid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0elpw 3938	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
2		0elon 4147	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
3		elin 3155	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On) ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∅ ∈ On))
4	1, 2, 3	mpbir2an 883	. . . 4 ⊢ ∅ ∈ (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)
5		ordtriexmidlem 4263	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On
6		suceq 4157	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → suc 𝑥 = suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
7		pweq 3385	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝒫 𝑥 = 𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
8	7	ineq1d 3166	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On) = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On))
9	6, 8	eqeq12d 2095	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On) ↔ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)))
10		ordpwsucexmid.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On suc 𝑥 = (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ On)
11	9, 10	vtoclri 2673	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On → suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On))
12	5, 11	ax-mp 7	. . . 4 ⊢ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = (𝒫 {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∩ On)
13	4, 12	eleqtrri 2154	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}
14		elsuci 4158	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ suc {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
15	13, 14	ax-mp 7	. 2 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
16		0ex 3905	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
17	16	snid 3425	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
18		biidd 170	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
19	18	elrab3 2750	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {∅} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
20	17, 19	ax-mp 7	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
21	20	biimpi 118	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
22		ordtriexmidlem2 4264	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ → ¬ 𝜑)
23	22	eqcoms 2084	. . 3 ⊢ (∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ¬ 𝜑)
24	21, 23	orim12i 708	. 2 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∨ ∅ = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑))
25	15, 24	ax-mp 7	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 661   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  ∀wral 2348  {crab 2352   ∩ cin 2972  ∅c0 3251  𝒫 cpw 3382  {csn 3398  Oncon0 4118  suc csuc 4120

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-nul 3904  ax-pow 3948

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-rab 2357  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-nul 3252  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-uni 3602  df-tr 3876  df-iord 4121  df-on 4123  df-suc 4126

This theorem is referenced by: (None)