![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > shftuz | GIF version |
Description: A shift of the upper integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Nov-2013.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
shftuz | ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | df-rab 2357 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))} | |
2 | simp2 939 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) | |
3 | zcn 8356 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) | |
4 | 3 | 3ad2ant1 959 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) |
5 | 2, 4 | npcand 7423 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) = 𝑥) |
6 | eluzadd 8647 | . . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) | |
7 | 6 | ancoms 264 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
8 | 7 | 3adant2 957 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → ((𝑥 − 𝐴) + 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
9 | 5, 8 | eqeltrrd 2156 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
10 | 9 | 3expib 1141 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
11 | 10 | adantr 270 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) → 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
12 | eluzelcn 8630 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) | |
13 | 12 | a1i 9 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → 𝑥 ∈ ℂ)) |
14 | eluzsub 8648 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) | |
15 | 14 | 3expia 1140 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))) |
16 | 15 | ancoms 264 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))) |
17 | 13, 16 | jcad 301 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)) → (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)))) |
18 | 11, 17 | impbid 127 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴)))) |
19 | 18 | abbi1dv 2198 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵))} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
20 | 1, 19 | syl5eq 2125 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) → {𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∣ (𝑥 − 𝐴) ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)} = (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 𝐴))) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ∧ w3a 919 = wceq 1284 ∈ wcel 1433 {cab 2067 {crab 2352 ‘cfv 4922 (class class class)co 5532 ℂcc 6979 + caddc 6984 − cmin 7279 ℤcz 8351 ℤ≥cuz 8619 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-in1 576 ax-in2 577 ax-io 662 ax-5 1376 ax-7 1377 ax-gen 1378 ax-ie1 1422 ax-ie2 1423 ax-8 1435 ax-10 1436 ax-11 1437 ax-i12 1438 ax-bndl 1439 ax-4 1440 ax-13 1444 ax-14 1445 ax-17 1459 ax-i9 1463 ax-ial 1467 ax-i5r 1468 ax-ext 2063 ax-sep 3896 ax-pow 3948 ax-pr 3964 ax-un 4188 ax-setind 4280 ax-cnex 7067 ax-resscn 7068 ax-1cn 7069 ax-1re 7070 ax-icn 7071 ax-addcl 7072 ax-addrcl 7073 ax-mulcl 7074 ax-addcom 7076 ax-addass 7078 ax-distr 7080 ax-i2m1 7081 ax-0lt1 7082 ax-0id 7084 ax-rnegex 7085 ax-cnre 7087 ax-pre-ltirr 7088 ax-pre-ltwlin 7089 ax-pre-lttrn 7090 ax-pre-ltadd 7092 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-3or 920 df-3an 921 df-tru 1287 df-fal 1290 df-nf 1390 df-sb 1686 df-eu 1944 df-mo 1945 df-clab 2068 df-cleq 2074 df-clel 2077 df-nfc 2208 df-ne 2246 df-nel 2340 df-ral 2353 df-rex 2354 df-reu 2355 df-rab 2357 df-v 2603 df-sbc 2816 df-dif 2975 df-un 2977 df-in 2979 df-ss 2986 df-pw 3384 df-sn 3404 df-pr 3405 df-op 3407 df-uni 3602 df-int 3637 df-br 3786 df-opab 3840 df-mpt 3841 df-id 4048 df-xp 4369 df-rel 4370 df-cnv 4371 df-co 4372 df-dm 4373 df-rn 4374 df-res 4375 df-ima 4376 df-iota 4887 df-fun 4924 df-fn 4925 df-f 4926 df-fv 4930 df-riota 5488 df-ov 5535 df-oprab 5536 df-mpt2 5537 df-pnf 7155 df-mnf 7156 df-xr 7157 df-ltxr 7158 df-le 7159 df-sub 7281 df-neg 7282 df-inn 8040 df-n0 8289 df-z 8352 df-uz 8620 |
This theorem is referenced by: (None) |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |