Theorem tfrlem3 5949

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑔   𝑓,𝑔,𝑤,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐹

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐴(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑓)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))}
2		vex 2604	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 5948	. 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤))))
4	3	abbi2i 2193	1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))}

Syntax hints:   ∧ wa 102   = wceq 1284  {cab 2067  ∀wral 2348  ∃wrex 2349  Oncon0 4118   ↾ cres 4365   Fn wfn 4917  ‘cfv 4922

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-uni 3602  df-br 3786  df-opab 3840  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-cnv 4371  df-co 4372  df-dm 4373  df-res 4375  df-iota 4887  df-fun 4924  df-fn 4925  df-fv 4930

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  5952  tfrlem8  5957  tfrlemi1  5969  tfrexlem  5971  tfri1d  5972  tfrex  5977