Theorem tfrlem3 5949

Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let A be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in A for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3.1	|- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfrlem3	|- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Distinct variable groups:   A, g   f, g, w, x, y, z, F

Allowed substitution hints:   A( x, y, z, w, f)

Proof of Theorem tfrlem3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfrlem3.1	. . 3 |- A = { f | E. x e. On ( f Fn x /\ A. y e. x ( f ` y ) = ( F ` ( f |` y ) ) ) }
2		vex 2604	. . 3 |- g e. _V
3	1, 2	tfrlem3a 5948	. 2 |- ( g e. A <-> E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) )
4	3	abbi2i 2193	1 |- A = { g | E. z e. On ( g Fn z /\ A. w e. z ( g ` w ) = ( F ` ( g |` w ) ) ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 102   = wceq 1284   {cab 2067   A.wral 2348   E.wrex 2349   Oncon0 4118   |` cres 4365   Fn wfn 4917   ` cfv 4922

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-v 2603  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-sn 3404  df-pr 3405  df-op 3407  df-uni 3602  df-br 3786  df-opab 3840  df-xp 4369  df-rel 4370  df-cnv 4371  df-co 4372  df-dm 4373  df-res 4375  df-iota 4887  df-fun 4924  df-fn 4925  df-fv 4930

This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem4  5952  tfrlem8  5957  tfrlemi1  5969  tfrexlem  5971  tfri1d  5972  tfrex  5977