Theorem eqvinop 4955

Description: A variable introduction law for ordered pairs. Analogue of Lemma 15 of [Monk2] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
eqvinop.1	|- B e. _V
eqvinop.2	|- C e. _V

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqvinop	|- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, A   x, B, y   x, C, y

Proof of Theorem eqvinop

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqvinop.1	. . . . . . . 8 |- B e. _V
2		eqvinop.2	. . . . . . . 8 |- C e. _V
3	1, 2	opth2 4949	. . . . . . 7 |- ( <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. <-> ( x = B /\ y = C ) )
4	3	anbi2i 730	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x = B /\ y = C ) ) )
5		ancom 466	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A = <. x , y >. /\ ( x = B /\ y = C ) ) <-> ( ( x = B /\ y = C ) /\ A = <. x , y >. ) )
6		anass 681	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ( x = B /\ y = C ) /\ A = <. x , y >. ) <-> ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
7	4, 5, 6	3bitri 286	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
8	7	exbii 1774	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> E. y ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
9		19.42v 1918	. . . 4 |- ( E. y ( x = B /\ ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) <-> ( x = B /\ E. y ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) )
10		opeq2 4403	. . . . . . 7 |- ( y = C -> <. x , y >. = <. x , C >. )
11	10	eqeq2d 2632	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = C -> ( A = <. x , y >. <-> A = <. x , C >. ) )
12	2, 11	ceqsexv 3242	. . . . 5 |- ( E. y ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) <-> A = <. x , C >. )
13	12	anbi2i 730	. . . 4 |- ( ( x = B /\ E. y ( y = C /\ A = <. x , y >. ) ) <-> ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) )
14	8, 9, 13	3bitri 286	. . 3 |- ( E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) )
15	14	exbii 1774	. 2 |- ( E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) <-> E. x ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) )
16		opeq1 4402	. . . 4 |- ( x = B -> <. x , C >. = <. B , C >. )
17	16	eqeq2d 2632	. . 3 |- ( x = B -> ( A = <. x , C >. <-> A = <. B , C >. ) )
18	1, 17	ceqsexv 3242	. 2 |- ( E. x ( x = B /\ A = <. x , C >. ) <-> A = <. B , C >. )
19	15, 18	bitr2i 265	1 |- ( A = <. B , C >. <-> E. x E. y ( A = <. x , y >. /\ <. x , y >. = <. B , C >. ) )

Syntax hints:   <-> wb 196   /\ wa 384   = wceq 1483   E.wex 1704   e. wcel 1990   _Vcvv 3200   <.cop 4183

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184

This theorem is referenced by:  copsexg  4956  ralxpf  5268  oprabid  6677