Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > scottexs | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Theorem scheme version of scottex 8748. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
scottexs | ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2764 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | |
2 | nfab1 2766 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | |
3 | nfv 1843 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfral 2945 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) |
5 | nfv 1843 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) | |
6 | fveq2 6191 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑥)) | |
7 | 6 | sseq1d 3632 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
8 | 7 | ralbidv 2986 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
9 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | cbvrab 3198 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} |
10 | df-rab 2921 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} | |
11 | abid 2610 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
12 | df-ral 2917 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) | |
13 | df-sbc 3436 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
14 | 13 | imbi1i 339 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
15 | 14 | albii 1747 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
16 | 12, 15 | bitr4i 267 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
17 | 11, 16 | anbi12i 733 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))) |
18 | 17 | abbii 2739 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} |
19 | 9, 10, 18 | 3eqtri 2648 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} |
20 | scottex 8748 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | |
21 | 19, 20 | eqeltrri 2698 | 1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 384 ∀wal 1481 ∈ wcel 1990 {cab 2608 ∀wral 2912 {crab 2916 Vcvv 3200 [wsbc 3435 ⊆ wss 3574 ‘cfv 5888 rankcrnk 8626 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-8 1992 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 ax-rep 4771 ax-sep 4781 ax-nul 4789 ax-pow 4843 ax-pr 4906 ax-un 6949 ax-reg 8497 ax-inf2 8538 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-3or 1038 df-3an 1039 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-eu 2474 df-mo 2475 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ne 2795 df-ral 2917 df-rex 2918 df-reu 2919 df-rab 2921 df-v 3202 df-sbc 3436 df-csb 3534 df-dif 3577 df-un 3579 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-pss 3590 df-nul 3916 df-if 4087 df-pw 4160 df-sn 4178 df-pr 4180 df-tp 4182 df-op 4184 df-uni 4437 df-int 4476 df-iun 4522 df-br 4654 df-opab 4713 df-mpt 4730 df-tr 4753 df-id 5024 df-eprel 5029 df-po 5035 df-so 5036 df-fr 5073 df-we 5075 df-xp 5120 df-rel 5121 df-cnv 5122 df-co 5123 df-dm 5124 df-rn 5125 df-res 5126 df-ima 5127 df-pred 5680 df-ord 5726 df-on 5727 df-lim 5728 df-suc 5729 df-iota 5851 df-fun 5890 df-fn 5891 df-f 5892 df-f1 5893 df-fo 5894 df-f1o 5895 df-fv 5896 df-om 7066 df-wrecs 7407 df-recs 7468 df-rdg 7506 df-r1 8627 df-rank 8628 |
This theorem is referenced by: hta 8760 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |