Theorem suppvalbr 7299

Description: The value of the operation constructing the support of a function expressed by binary relations. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suppvalbr	⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))})

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦   𝑥,𝑍,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem suppvalbr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		suppval 7297	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∣ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍}})
2		df-rab 2921	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∣ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍}} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍})}
3		vex 3203	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
4	3	eldm 5321	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
5		df-sn 4178	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑍} = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝑍}
6	5	neeq2i 2859	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ({𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ≠ {𝑍} ↔ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ≠ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝑍})
7		imasng 5487	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ V → (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦})
8	3, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) = {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦}
9	8	neeq1i 2858	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍} ↔ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ≠ {𝑍})
10		nabbi 2896	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍) ↔ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} ≠ {𝑦 ∣ 𝑦 = 𝑍})
11	6, 9, 10	3bitr4i 292	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍} ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍))
12	4, 11	anbi12i 733	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍}) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍)))
13	12	abbii 2739	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍})} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍))}
14	2, 13	eqtri 2644	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∣ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍}} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍))}
15	14	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∣ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}) ≠ {𝑍}} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍))})
16		df-ne 2795	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ≠ 𝑍 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍)
17	16	bicomi 214	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍)
18	17	bibi2i 327	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))
19	18	exbii 1774	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))
20	19	anbi2i 730	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍)) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍)))
21	20	abbii 2739	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍))} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))}
22	21	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑦 = 𝑍))} = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))})
23	1, 15, 22	3eqtrd 2660	1 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 supp 𝑍) = {𝑥 ∣ (∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ∃𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦 ≠ 𝑍))})

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483  ∃wex 1704   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608   ≠ wne 2794  {crab 2916  Vcvv 3200  {csn 4177   class class class wbr 4653  dom cdm 5114   “ cima 5117  (class class class)co 6650   supp csupp 7295

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-supp 7296

This theorem is referenced by:  suppimacnvss  7305  suppimacnv  7306