Theorem ordtriexmid 4265

Description: Ordinal trichotomy implies the law of the excluded middle (that is, decidability of an arbitrary proposition).

This theorem is stated in "Constructive ordinals", [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic".

(Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 14-Nov-2018.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ordtriexmid.1	⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ordtriexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜑(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem ordtriexmid

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		noel 3255	. . . 4 ⊢ ¬ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅
2		ordtriexmidlem 4263	. . . . . 6 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On
3		eleq1 2141	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ↔ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅))
4		eqeq1 2087	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (𝑥 = ∅ ↔ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅))
5		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → (∅ ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
6	3, 4, 5	3orbi123d 1242	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → ((𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅ ∨ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
7		0elon 4147	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∅ ∈ On
8		0ex 3905	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
9		eleq1 2141	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ On ↔ ∅ ∈ On))
10	9	anbi2d 451	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ On ∧ ∅ ∈ On)))
11		eleq2 2142	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ ∅))
12		eqeq2 2090	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 = ∅))
13		eleq1 2141	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∅ ∈ 𝑥))
14	11, 12, 13	3orbi123d 1242	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝑥)))
15	10, 14	imbi12d 232	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ ∅ ∈ On) → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝑥))))
16		ordtriexmid.1	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
17	16	rspec2 2450	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ 𝑦 ∈ On) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥))
18	8, 15, 17	vtocl 2653	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ On ∧ ∅ ∈ On) → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝑥))
19	7, 18	mpan2 415	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝑥))
20	6, 19	vtoclga 2664	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ On → ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅ ∨ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
21	2, 20	ax-mp 7	. . . . 5 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅ ∨ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
22		3orass 922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅ ∨ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅ ∨ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})))
23	21, 22	mpbi 143	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ ∅ ∨ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}))
24	1, 23	mtpor 1356	. . 3 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑})
25		ordtriexmidlem2 4264	. . . 4 ⊢ ({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ → ¬ 𝜑)
26	8	snid 3425	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
27		biidd 170	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
28	27	elrab3 2750	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {∅} → (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑))
29	26, 28	ax-mp 7	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
30	29	biimpi 118	. . . 4 ⊢ (∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜑)
31	25, 30	orim12i 708	. . 3 ⊢ (({𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑}) → (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜑))
32	24, 31	ax-mp 7	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜑)
33		orcom 679	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜑))
34	32, 33	mpbir 144	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 661   ∨ w3o 918   = wceq 1284   ∈ wcel 1433  ∀wral 2348  {crab 2352  ∅c0 3251  {csn 3398  Oncon0 4118

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-in1 576  ax-in2 577  ax-io 662  ax-5 1376  ax-7 1377  ax-gen 1378  ax-ie1 1422  ax-ie2 1423  ax-8 1435  ax-10 1436  ax-11 1437  ax-i12 1438  ax-bndl 1439  ax-4 1440  ax-14 1445  ax-17 1459  ax-i9 1463  ax-ial 1467  ax-i5r 1468  ax-ext 2063  ax-sep 3896  ax-nul 3904  ax-pow 3948

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-3or 920  df-3an 921  df-tru 1287  df-nf 1390  df-sb 1686  df-clab 2068  df-cleq 2074  df-clel 2077  df-nfc 2208  df-ral 2353  df-rex 2354  df-rab 2357  df-v 2603  df-dif 2975  df-un 2977  df-in 2979  df-ss 2986  df-nul 3252  df-pw 3384  df-sn 3404  df-uni 3602  df-tr 3876  df-iord 4121  df-on 4123  df-suc 4126

This theorem is referenced by: (None)