Theorem offres 7163

Description: Pointwise combination commutes with restriction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
offres	⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)))

Proof of Theorem offres

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		inss2 3834	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐷
2	1	sseli 3599	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐷)
3		fvres 6207	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑥))
4		fvres 6207	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 → ((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑥))
5	3, 4	oveq12d 6668	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥)))
6	2, 5	syl 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) → (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥)))
7	6	mpteq2ia 4740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) ↦ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥)))
8		inindi 3830	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐷 ∩ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺)) = ((𝐷 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ dom 𝐺))
9		incom 3805	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) = (𝐷 ∩ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺))
10		dmres 5419	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) = (𝐷 ∩ dom 𝐹)
11		dmres 5419	. . . . . 6 ⊢ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷) = (𝐷 ∩ dom 𝐺)
12	10, 11	ineq12i 3812	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∩ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) = ((𝐷 ∩ dom 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ dom 𝐺))
13	8, 9, 12	3eqtr4ri 2655	. . . 4 ⊢ (dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∩ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) = ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷)
14		eqid 2622	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)) = (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥))
15	13, 14	mpteq12i 4742	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ (dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∩ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) ↦ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) ↦ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)))
16		resmpt3 5450	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))) ↾ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ ((dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ∩ 𝐷) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥)))
17	7, 15, 16	3eqtr4ri 2655	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))) ↾ 𝐷) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∩ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) ↦ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)))
18		offval3 7162	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))))
19	18	reseq1d 5395	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝑥 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) ↦ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐺‘𝑥))) ↾ 𝐷))
20		resexg 5442	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∈ V)
21		resexg 5442	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷) ∈ V)
22		offval3 7162	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∈ V ∧ (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷) ∈ V) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∩ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) ↦ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥))))
23	20, 21, 22	syl2an 494	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) = (𝑥 ∈ (dom (𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∩ dom (𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)) ↦ (((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥)𝑅((𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)‘𝑥))))
24	17, 19, 23	3eqtr4a 2682	1 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐹 ∘𝑓 𝑅𝐺) ↾ 𝐷) = ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐷) ∘𝑓 𝑅(𝐺 ↾ 𝐷)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  Vcvv 3200   ∩ cin 3573   ↦ cmpt 4729  dom cdm 5114   ↾ cres 5116  ‘cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650   ∘_𝑓 cof 6895

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-of 6897

This theorem is referenced by:  pwssplit2  19060  pwssplit3  19061  islindf4  20177  tsmsadd  21950  jensen  24715  fdivmpt  42334