Theorem scutcut 31912

Description: Cut properties of the surreal cut operation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
scutcut	⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem scutcut

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		scutval 31911	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) = (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})))
2		conway 31910	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}))
3		riotacl 6625	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)}) → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
4	2, 3	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (℩𝑥 ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ( bday ‘𝑥) = ∩ ( bday “ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
5	1, 4	eqeltrd 2701	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → (𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)})
6		sneq 4187	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → {𝑦} = {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)})
7	6	breq2d 4665	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ↔ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)}))
8	6	breq1d 4663	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ({𝑦} <<s 𝐵 ↔ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 747	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐴 |s 𝐵) → ((𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
10	9	elrab 3363	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
11		3anass 1042	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵) ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ (𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵)))
12	10, 11	bitr4i 267	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ {𝑦 ∈ No ∣ (𝐴 <<s {𝑦} ∧ {𝑦} <<s 𝐵)} ↔ ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))
13	5, 12	sylib 208	1 ⊢ (𝐴 <<s 𝐵 → ((𝐴 |s 𝐵) ∈ No ∧ 𝐴 <<s {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} ∧ {(𝐴 |s 𝐵)} <<s 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   ∧ w3a 1037   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∃!wreu 2914  {crab 2916  {csn 4177  ∩ cint 4475   class class class wbr 4653   “ cima 5117  ‘cfv 5888  ℩crio 6610  (class class class)co 6650   No csur 31793   bday cbday 31795   <<s csslt 31896   |s cscut 31898

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rmo 2920  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-int 4476  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-tr 4753  df-id 5024  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-suc 5729  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-riota 6611  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-1o 7560  df-2o 7561  df-no 31796  df-slt 31797  df-bday 31798  df-sslt 31897  df-scut 31899

This theorem is referenced by:  scutbday  31913  scutun12  31917  scutf  31919  slerec  31923  sltrec  31924  madeval2  31936