xposdif - Metamath Proof Explorer

	Metamath Proof Explorer		< Previous Next > Nearby theorems
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > xposdif		Structured version Visualization version GIF version

Theorem xposdif 12092

Description: Extended real version of posdif 10521. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Aug-2015.)

**Assertion**
Ref	Expression
xposdif	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

**Proof of Theorem xposdif**
Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xnegcl 12044	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*)
2		xaddcl 12070	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
3	1, 2	sylan2 491	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^) → (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^)
4		xlt0neg1 12050	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
5	3, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
6		xsubge0 12091	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
7	6	notbid 308	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
8		0xr 10086	. . . 4 ⊢ 0 ∈ ℝ^*
9		xrltnle 10105	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 0 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
10	3, 8, 9	sylancl 694	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ ¬ 0 ≤ (𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵)))
11		xrltnle 10105	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
12	7, 10, 11	3bitr4d 300	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → ((𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) < 0 ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
13		xnegdi 12078	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ -_𝑒𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
14	1, 13	sylan2 491	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵))
15		xnegneg 12045	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵 = 𝐵)
16	15	oveq2d 6666	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℝ^* → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
17	16	adantl 482	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒-_𝑒𝐵) = (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵))
18		xnegcl 12044	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* → -_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^*)
19		xaddcom 12071	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((-_𝑒𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
20	18, 19	sylan 488	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (-_𝑒𝐴 +_𝑒 𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
21	14, 17, 20	3eqtrd 2660	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) = (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴))
22	21	breq2d 4665	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (0 < -_𝑒(𝐴 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐵) ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))
23	5, 12, 22	3bitr3d 298	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ^* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ^*) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 +_𝑒 -_𝑒𝐴)))

Colors of variables: wff setvar class

Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 196 ∧ wa 384 = wceq 1483 ∈ wcel 1990 class class class wbr 4653 (class class class)co 6650 0cc0 9936 ℝ^*cxr 10073 < clt 10074 ≤ cle 10075 -_𝑒cxne 11943 +_𝑒 cxad 11944

This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1722 ax-4 1737 ax-5 1839 ax-6 1888 ax-7 1935 ax-8 1992 ax-9 1999 ax-10 2019 ax-11 2034 ax-12 2047 ax-13 2246 ax-ext 2602 ax-sep 4781 ax-nul 4789 ax-pow 4843 ax-pr 4906 ax-un 6949 ax-cnex 9992 ax-resscn 9993 ax-1cn 9994 ax-icn 9995 ax-addcl 9996 ax-addrcl 9997 ax-mulcl 9998 ax-mulrcl 9999 ax-mulcom 10000 ax-addass 10001 ax-mulass 10002 ax-distr 10003 ax-i2m1 10004 ax-1ne0 10005 ax-1rid 10006 ax-rnegex 10007 ax-rrecex 10008 ax-cnre 10009 ax-pre-lttri 10010 ax-pre-lttrn 10011 ax-pre-ltadd 10012

This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 197 df-or 385 df-an 386 df-3or 1038 df-3an 1039 df-tru 1486 df-ex 1705 df-nf 1710 df-sb 1881 df-eu 2474 df-mo 2475 df-clab 2609 df-cleq 2615 df-clel 2618 df-nfc 2753 df-ne 2795 df-nel 2898 df-ral 2917 df-rex 2918 df-reu 2919 df-rab 2921 df-v 3202 df-sbc 3436 df-csb 3534 df-dif 3577 df-un 3579 df-in 3581 df-ss 3588 df-nul 3916 df-if 4087 df-pw 4160 df-sn 4178 df-pr 4180 df-op 4184 df-uni 4437 df-iun 4522 df-br 4654 df-opab 4713 df-mpt 4730 df-id 5024 df-po 5035 df-so 5036 df-xp 5120 df-rel 5121 df-cnv 5122 df-co 5123 df-dm 5124 df-rn 5125 df-res 5126 df-ima 5127 df-iota 5851 df-fun 5890 df-fn 5891 df-f 5892 df-f1 5893 df-fo 5894 df-f1o 5895 df-fv 5896 df-riota 6611 df-ov 6653 df-oprab 6654 df-mpt2 6655 df-1st 7168 df-2nd 7169 df-er 7742 df-en 7956 df-dom 7957 df-sdom 7958 df-pnf 10076 df-mnf 10077 df-xr 10078 df-ltxr 10079 df-le 10080 df-sub 10268 df-neg 10269 df-xneg 11946 df-xadd 11947

This theorem is referenced by: blcld 22310 metdstri 22654

W3C validator