Theorem 2dom 8029

Description: A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
2dom	|- ( 2o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )

Distinct variable group:   x, y, A

Proof of Theorem 2dom

Dummy variable f is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df2o2 7574	. . . 4 |- 2o = { (/) , { (/) } }
2	1	breq1i 4660	. . 3 |- ( 2o ~<_ A <-> { (/) , { (/) } } ~<_ A )
3		brdomi 7966	. . 3 |- ( { (/) , { (/) } } ~<_ A -> E. f f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A )
4	2, 3	sylbi 207	. 2 |- ( 2o ~<_ A -> E. f f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A )
5		f1f 6101	. . . . 5 |- ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> f : { (/) , { (/) } } --> A )
6		0ex 4790	. . . . . 6 |- (/) e. _V
7	6	prid1 4297	. . . . 5 |- (/) e. { (/) , { (/) } }
8		ffvelrn 6357	. . . . 5 |- ( ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } --> A /\ (/) e. { (/) , { (/) } } ) -> ( f ` (/) ) e. A )
9	5, 7, 8	sylancl 694	. . . 4 |- ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> ( f ` (/) ) e. A )
10		p0ex 4853	. . . . . 6 |- { (/) } e. _V
11	10	prid2 4298	. . . . 5 |- { (/) } e. { (/) , { (/) } }
12		ffvelrn 6357	. . . . 5 |- ( ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } --> A /\ { (/) } e. { (/) , { (/) } } ) -> ( f ` { (/) } ) e. A )
13	5, 11, 12	sylancl 694	. . . 4 |- ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> ( f ` { (/) } ) e. A )
14		0nep0 4836	. . . . . 6 |- (/) =/= { (/) }
15	14	neii 2796	. . . . 5 |- -. (/) = { (/) }
16		f1fveq 6519	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A /\ ( (/) e. { (/) , { (/) } } /\ { (/) } e. { (/) , { (/) } } ) ) -> ( ( f ` (/) ) = ( f ` { (/) } ) <-> (/) = { (/) } ) )
17	7, 11, 16	mpanr12 721	. . . . 5 |- ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> ( ( f ` (/) ) = ( f ` { (/) } ) <-> (/) = { (/) } ) )
18	15, 17	mtbiri 317	. . . 4 |- ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> -. ( f ` (/) ) = ( f ` { (/) } ) )
19		eqeq1 2626	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = ( f ` (/) ) -> ( x = y <-> ( f ` (/) ) = y ) )
20	19	notbid 308	. . . . 5 |- ( x = ( f ` (/) ) -> ( -. x = y <-> -. ( f ` (/) ) = y ) )
21		eqeq2 2633	. . . . . 6 |- ( y = ( f ` { (/) } ) -> ( ( f ` (/) ) = y <-> ( f ` (/) ) = ( f ` { (/) } ) ) )
22	21	notbid 308	. . . . 5 |- ( y = ( f ` { (/) } ) -> ( -. ( f ` (/) ) = y <-> -. ( f ` (/) ) = ( f ` { (/) } ) ) )
23	20, 22	rspc2ev 3324	. . . 4 |- ( ( ( f ` (/) ) e. A /\ ( f ` { (/) } ) e. A /\ -. ( f ` (/) ) = ( f ` { (/) } ) ) -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )
24	9, 13, 18, 23	syl3anc 1326	. . 3 |- ( f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )
25	24	exlimiv 1858	. 2 |- ( E. f f : { (/) , { (/) } } -1-1-> A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )
26	4, 25	syl 17	1 |- ( 2o ~<_ A -> E. x e. A E. y e. A -. x = y )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   <-> wb 196   = wceq 1483   E.wex 1704   e. wcel 1990   E.wrex 2913   (/)c0 3915   {csn 4177   {cpr 4179   class class class wbr 4653   -->wf 5884   -1-1->wf1 5885   ` cfv 5888   2oc2o 7554   ~<_ cdom 7953

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-suc 5729  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fv 5896  df-1o 7560  df-2o 7561  df-dom 7957

This theorem is referenced by:  1sdom  8163