Theorem bnj60 31130

Description: Well-founded recursion, part 1 of 3. The proof has been taken from Chapter 4 of Don Monk's notes on Set Theory. See http://euclid.colorado.edu/~monkd/setth.pdf. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bnj60.1	⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
bnj60.2	⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
bnj60.3	⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
bnj60.4	⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bnj60	⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝐵,𝑓   𝐺,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥   𝑅,𝑑,𝑓,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑥,𝑑)   𝐶(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝐹(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)   𝑌(𝑥,𝑓,𝑑)

Proof of Theorem bnj60

Dummy variables 𝑔 ℎ are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bnj60.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑑 ∣ (𝑑 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅) ⊆ 𝑑)}
2		bnj60.2	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑌 = ⟨𝑥, (𝑓 ↾ pred(𝑥, 𝐴, 𝑅))⟩
3		bnj60.3	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑓 Fn 𝑑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑑 (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝐺‘𝑌))}
4	1, 2, 3	bnj1497 31128	. . . 4 ⊢ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔
5		eqid 2622	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ) = (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)
6	1, 2, 3, 5	bnj1311 31092	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ℎ ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
7	6	3expia 1267	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → (ℎ ∈ 𝐶 → (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
8	7	ralrimiv 2965	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐶) → ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
9	8	ralrimiva 2966	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)))
10		biid 251	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔)
11		biid 251	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) ↔ (∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))))
12	10, 5, 11	bnj1383 30902	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 Fun 𝑔 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐶 ∀ℎ ∈ 𝐶 (𝑔 ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ)) = (ℎ ↾ (dom 𝑔 ∩ dom ℎ))) → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
13	4, 9, 12	sylancr 695	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun ∪ 𝐶)
14		bnj60.4	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = ∪ 𝐶
15	14	funeqi 5909	. . 3 ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ∪ 𝐶)
16	13, 15	sylibr 224	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → Fun 𝐹)
17	1, 2, 3, 14	bnj1498 31129	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
18	16, 17	bnj1422 30908	1 ⊢ (𝑅 FrSe 𝐴 → 𝐹 Fn 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913   ∩ cin 3573   ⊆ wss 3574  ⟨cop 4183  ∪ cuni 4436  dom cdm 5114   ↾ cres 5116  Fun wfun 5882   Fn wfn 5883  ‘cfv 5888   predc-bnj14 30754   FrSe w-bnj15 30758

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949  ax-reg 8497  ax-inf2 8538

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-fal 1489  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-tr 4753  df-id 5024  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-om 7066  df-1o 7560  df-bnj17 30753  df-bnj14 30755  df-bnj13 30757  df-bnj15 30759  df-bnj18 30761  df-bnj19 30763

This theorem is referenced by:  bnj1501  31135  bnj1523  31139