Theorem wepwso 37613

Description: A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
wepwso.t	⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wepwso	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤   𝑥,𝐴,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑇(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem wepwso

Dummy variable 𝑎 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		2onn 7720	. . . . 5 ⊢ 2𝑜 ∈ ω
2		nnord 7073	. . . . 5 ⊢ (2𝑜 ∈ ω → Ord 2𝑜)
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ Ord 2𝑜
4		ordwe 5736	. . . 4 ⊢ (Ord 2𝑜 → E We 2𝑜)
5		weso 5105	. . . 4 ⊢ ( E We 2𝑜 → E Or 2𝑜)
6	3, 4, 5	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ E Or 2𝑜
7		eqid 2622	. . . 4 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}
8	7	wemapso 8456	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ E Or 2𝑜) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴))
9	6, 8	mp3an3 1413	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴))
10		elex 3212	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
11		wepwso.t	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}
12		eqid 2622	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜})) = (𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜}))
13	11, 7, 12	wepwsolem 37612	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
14		isoso 6598	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 ∈ (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1𝑜})) Isom {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}, 𝑇((2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
15	10, 13, 14	3syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
16	15	adantr 481	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))} Or (2𝑜 ↑𝑚 𝐴) ↔ 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴))
17	9, 16	mpbid 222	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 196   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  ∀wral 2912  ∃wrex 2913  Vcvv 3200  𝒫 cpw 4158  {csn 4177   class class class wbr 4653  {copab 4712   ↦ cmpt 4729   E cep 5028   Or wor 5034   We wwe 5072  ^◡ccnv 5113   “ cima 5117  Ord word 5722  ‘cfv 5888   Isom wiso 5889  (class class class)co 6650  ωcom 7065  1_𝑜c1o 7553  2_𝑜c2o 7554   ↑_𝑚 cmap 7857

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-tr 4753  df-id 5024  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-isom 5897  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-om 7066  df-1st 7168  df-2nd 7169  df-1o 7560  df-2o 7561  df-map 7859

This theorem is referenced by:  aomclem1  37624