Theorem sbth 8080

Description: Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem. Theorem 18 of [Suppes] p. 95. This theorem states that if set 𝐴 is smaller (has lower cardinality) than 𝐵 and vice-versa, then 𝐴 and 𝐵 are equinumerous (have the same cardinality). The interesting thing is that this can be proved without invoking the Axiom of Choice, as we do here, but the proof as you can see is quite difficult. (The theorem can be proved more easily if we allow AC.) The main proof consists of lemmas sbthlem1 8070 through sbthlem10 8079; this final piece mainly changes bound variables to eliminate the hypotheses of sbthlem10 8079. We follow closely the proof in Suppes, which you should consult to understand our proof at a higher level. Note that Suppes' proof, which is credited to J. M. Whitaker, does not require the Axiom of Infinity. This is Metamath 100 proof #25. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1998.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbth	⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem sbth

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑤 𝑓 𝑔 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		reldom 7961	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel ≼
2	1	brrelexi 5158	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
3	1	brrelexi 5158	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ≼ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4		breq1 4656	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝑤))
5		breq2 4657	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑤 ≼ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴))
6	4, 5	anbi12d 747	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴)))
7		breq1 4656	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ≈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤))
8	6, 7	imbi12d 334	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐴 → (((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤)))
9		breq2 4657	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵))
10		breq1 4656	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝑤 ≼ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴))
11	9, 10	anbi12d 747	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)))
12		breq2 4657	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≈ 𝑤 ↔ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
13	11, 12	imbi12d 334	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝐵 → (((𝐴 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝑤) ↔ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)))
14		vex 3203	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑧 ∈ V
15		sseq1 3626	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧))
16		imaeq2 5462	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑓 “ 𝑦) = (𝑓 “ 𝑥))
17	16	difeq2d 3728	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦)) = (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥)))
18	17	imaeq2d 5466	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) = (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))))
19		difeq2 3722	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦) = (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥))
20	18, 19	sseq12d 3634	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦) ↔ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥)))
21	15, 20	anbi12d 747	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦)) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥))))
22	21	cbvabv 2747	. . . . 5 ⊢ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑥))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑥))}
23		eqid 2622	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))}) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 ∖ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))}))) = ((𝑓 ↾ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))}) ∪ (◡𝑔 ↾ (𝑧 ∖ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝑧 ∧ (𝑔 “ (𝑤 ∖ (𝑓 “ 𝑦))) ⊆ (𝑧 ∖ 𝑦))})))
24		vex 3203	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
25	14, 22, 23, 24	sbthlem10 8079	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑧 ≼ 𝑤 ∧ 𝑤 ≼ 𝑧) → 𝑧 ≈ 𝑤)
26	8, 13, 25	vtocl2g 3270	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
27	2, 3, 26	syl2an 494	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵))
28	27	pm2.43i 52	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 384   = wceq 1483   ∈ wcel 1990  {cab 2608  Vcvv 3200   ∖ cdif 3571   ∪ cun 3572   ⊆ wss 3574  ∪ cuni 4436   class class class wbr 4653  ^◡ccnv 5113   ↾ cres 5116   “ cima 5117   ≈ cen 7952   ≼ cdom 7953

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-id 5024  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-en 7956  df-dom 7957

This theorem is referenced by:  sbthb  8081  sdomnsym  8085  domtriord  8106  xpen  8123  limenpsi  8135  php  8144  onomeneq  8150  unbnn  8216  infxpenlem  8836  fseqen  8850  infpwfien  8885  inffien  8886  alephdom  8904  mappwen  8935  infcdaabs  9028  infunabs  9029  infcda  9030  infdif  9031  infxpabs  9034  infmap2  9040  gchaleph  9493  gchhar  9501  inttsk  9596  inar1  9597  znnen  14941  qnnen  14942  rpnnen  14956  rexpen  14957  mreexfidimd  16311  acsinfdimd  17182  fislw  18040  opnreen  22634  ovolctb2  23260  vitali  23382  aannenlem3  24085  basellem4  24810  lgsqrlem4  25074  upgrex  25987  phpreu  33393  poimirlem26  33435  pellexlem4  37396  pellexlem5  37397  idomsubgmo  37776