MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  upgr2wlk Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem upgr2wlk 26564
Description: Properties of a pair of functions to be a walk of length 2 in a pseudograph. Note that the vertices need not to be distinct and the edges can be loops or multiedges. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 28-Oct-2021.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
upgr2wlk.v 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
upgr2wlk.i 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
Assertion
Ref Expression
upgr2wlk (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))

Proof of Theorem upgr2wlk
Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 upgr2wlk.v . . . 4 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
2 upgr2wlk.i . . . 4 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
31, 2upgriswlk 26537 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
43anbi1d 741 . 2 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2)))
5 iswrdb 13311 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝐹:(0..^(#‘𝐹))⟶dom 𝐼)
6 oveq2 6658 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (0..^(#‘𝐹)) = (0..^2))
76feq2d 6031 . . . . . . . . 9 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (𝐹:(0..^(#‘𝐹))⟶dom 𝐼𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼))
85, 7syl5bb 272 . . . . . . . 8 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼))
9 oveq2 6658 . . . . . . . . 9 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (0...(#‘𝐹)) = (0...2))
109feq2d 6031 . . . . . . . 8 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉))
11 fzo0to2pr 12553 . . . . . . . . . . 11 (0..^2) = {0, 1}
126, 11syl6eq 2672 . . . . . . . . . 10 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (0..^(#‘𝐹)) = {0, 1})
1312raleqdv 3144 . . . . . . . . 9 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ↔ ∀𝑘 ∈ {0, 1} (𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}))
14 2wlklem 26563 . . . . . . . . 9 (∀𝑘 ∈ {0, 1} (𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ↔ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))
1513, 14syl6bb 276 . . . . . . . 8 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ↔ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})))
168, 10, 153anbi123d 1399 . . . . . . 7 ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
1716adantl 482 . . . . . 6 ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
18 3anass 1042 . . . . . 6 ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
1917, 18syl6bb 276 . . . . 5 ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})))))
2019ex 450 . . . 4 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((#‘𝐹) = 2 → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))))
2120pm5.32rd 672 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2)))
22 3anass 1042 . . . 4 (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
23 an32 839 . . . 4 (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2))
2422, 23bitri 264 . . 3 (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2))
2521, 24syl6bbr 278 . 2 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹𝑘)) = {(𝑃𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))}) ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
26 2nn0 11309 . . . . . . 7 2 ∈ ℕ0
27 fnfzo0hash 13234 . . . . . . 7 ((2 ∈ ℕ0𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼) → (#‘𝐹) = 2)
2826, 27mpan 706 . . . . . 6 (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 → (#‘𝐹) = 2)
2928pm4.71i 664 . . . . 5 (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2))
3029bicomi 214 . . . 4 ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼)
3130a1i 11 . . 3 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ 𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼))
32313anbi1d 1403 . 2 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (((𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)})) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
334, 25, 323bitrd 294 1 (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)⟶dom 𝐼𝑃:(0...2)⟶𝑉 ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {(𝑃‘0), (𝑃‘1)} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {(𝑃‘1), (𝑃‘2)}))))
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wb 196  wa 384  w3a 1037   = wceq 1483  wcel 1990  wral 2912  {cpr 4179   class class class wbr 4653  dom cdm 5114  wf 5884  cfv 5888  (class class class)co 6650  0cc0 9936  1c1 9937   + caddc 9939  2c2 11070  0cn0 11292  ...cfz 12326  ..^cfzo 12465  #chash 13117  Word cword 13291  Vtxcvtx 25874  iEdgciedg 25875   UPGraph cupgr 25975  Walkscwlks 26492
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1722  ax-4 1737  ax-5 1839  ax-6 1888  ax-7 1935  ax-8 1992  ax-9 1999  ax-10 2019  ax-11 2034  ax-12 2047  ax-13 2246  ax-ext 2602  ax-rep 4771  ax-sep 4781  ax-nul 4789  ax-pow 4843  ax-pr 4906  ax-un 6949  ax-cnex 9992  ax-resscn 9993  ax-1cn 9994  ax-icn 9995  ax-addcl 9996  ax-addrcl 9997  ax-mulcl 9998  ax-mulrcl 9999  ax-mulcom 10000  ax-addass 10001  ax-mulass 10002  ax-distr 10003  ax-i2m1 10004  ax-1ne0 10005  ax-1rid 10006  ax-rnegex 10007  ax-rrecex 10008  ax-cnre 10009  ax-pre-lttri 10010  ax-pre-lttrn 10011  ax-pre-ltadd 10012  ax-pre-mulgt0 10013
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 197  df-or 385  df-an 386  df-ifp 1013  df-3or 1038  df-3an 1039  df-tru 1486  df-ex 1705  df-nf 1710  df-sb 1881  df-eu 2474  df-mo 2475  df-clab 2609  df-cleq 2615  df-clel 2618  df-nfc 2753  df-ne 2795  df-nel 2898  df-ral 2917  df-rex 2918  df-reu 2919  df-rmo 2920  df-rab 2921  df-v 3202  df-sbc 3436  df-csb 3534  df-dif 3577  df-un 3579  df-in 3581  df-ss 3588  df-pss 3590  df-nul 3916  df-if 4087  df-pw 4160  df-sn 4178  df-pr 4180  df-tp 4182  df-op 4184  df-uni 4437  df-int 4476  df-iun 4522  df-br 4654  df-opab 4713  df-mpt 4730  df-tr 4753  df-id 5024  df-eprel 5029  df-po 5035  df-so 5036  df-fr 5073  df-we 5075  df-xp 5120  df-rel 5121  df-cnv 5122  df-co 5123  df-dm 5124  df-rn 5125  df-res 5126  df-ima 5127  df-pred 5680  df-ord 5726  df-on 5727  df-lim 5728  df-suc 5729  df-iota 5851  df-fun 5890  df-fn 5891  df-f 5892  df-f1 5893  df-fo 5894  df-f1o 5895  df-fv 5896  df-riota 6611  df-ov 6653  df-oprab 6654  df-mpt2 6655  df-om 7066  df-1st 7168  df-2nd 7169  df-wrecs 7407  df-recs 7468  df-rdg 7506  df-1o 7560  df-2o 7561  df-oadd 7564  df-er 7742  df-map 7859  df-pm 7860  df-en 7956  df-dom 7957  df-sdom 7958  df-fin 7959  df-card 8765  df-cda 8990  df-pnf 10076  df-mnf 10077  df-xr 10078  df-ltxr 10079  df-le 10080  df-sub 10268  df-neg 10269  df-nn 11021  df-2 11079  df-n0 11293  df-xnn0 11364  df-z 11378  df-uz 11688  df-fz 12327  df-fzo 12466  df-hash 13118  df-word 13299  df-edg 25940  df-uhgr 25953  df-upgr 25977  df-wlks 26495
This theorem is referenced by:  umgrwwlks2on  26850
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator