P. 26 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2501-2600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	r19.32r 2501	One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( ( ph \/ A. x e. A ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.32vr 2502*	One direction of Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers. For decidable propositions this is an equivalence, as seen at r19.32vdc 2503. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Aug-2018.)
|- ( ( ph \/ A. x e. A ps ) -> A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.32vdc 2503*	Theorem 19.32 of [Margaris] p. 90 with restricted quantifiers, where ph is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( A. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( ph \/ A. x e. A ps ) ) )
Theorem	r19.35-1 2504	Restricted quantifier version of 19.35-1 1555. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.36av 2505*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic, the converse would hold if A has at least one element, but in intuitionistic logic, that is not a sufficient condition. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	r19.37 2506	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse would hold if A has at least one element, but that is not sufficient in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by FL, 13-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.37av 2507*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.40 2508	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.41 2509	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
|- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.41v 2510*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.42v 2511*	Restricted version of Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.43 2512	Restricted version of Theorem 19.43 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.44av 2513*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.45av 2514*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) -> ( ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	ralcomf 2515*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcomf 2516*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	ralcom 2517*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom 2518*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom13 2519*	Swap 1st and 3rd restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C ph <-> E. z e. C E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexrot4 2520*	Rotate existential restricted quantifiers twice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C E. w e. D ph <-> E. z e. C E. w e. D E. x e. A E. y e. B ph )
Theorem	ralcom3 2521	A commutative law for restricted quantifiers that swaps the domain of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x e. B -> ph ) <-> A. x e. B ( x e. A -> ph ) )
Theorem	reean 2522*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	reeanv 2523*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	3reeanv 2524*	Rearrange three existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps /\ E. z e. C ch ) )
Theorem	nfreu1 2525	x is not free in E! x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
|- F/ x E! x e. A ph
Theorem	nfrmo1 2526	x is not free in E* x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ x E* x e. A ph
Theorem	nfreudxy 2527*	Not-free deduction for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfreuxy 2528*	Not-free for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x E! y e. A ph
Theorem	rabid 2529	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. { x e. A | ph } <-> ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	rabid2 2530*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( A = { x e. A | ph } <-> A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rabbi 2531	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbidva 2592. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ps <-> ch ) <-> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. A | ch } )
Theorem	rabswap 2532	Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
|- { x e. A | x e. B } = { x e. B | x e. A }
Theorem	nfrab1 2533	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
|- F/_ x { x e. A | ph }
Theorem	nfrabxy 2534*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { y e. A | ph }
Theorem	reubida 2535	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubidva 2536*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubidv 2537*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubiia 2538	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. A ps )
Theorem	reubii 2539	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. A ps )
Theorem	rmobida 2540	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobidva 2541*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobidv 2542*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobiia 2543	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. A ps )
Theorem	rmobii 2544	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. A ps )
Theorem	raleqf 2545	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rexeqf 2546	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	reueq1f 2547	Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rmoeq1f 2548	Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	raleq 2549*	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rexeq 2550*	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	reueq1 2551*	Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rmoeq1 2552*	Equality theorem for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	raleqi 2553*	Equality inference for restricted universal qualifier. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph )
Theorem	rexeqi 2554*	Equality inference for restricted existential qualifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	raleqdv 2555*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rexeqdv 2556*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	raleqbi1dv 2557*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rexeqbi1dv 2558*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	reueqd 2559*	Equality deduction for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rmoeqd 2560*	Equality deduction for restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	raleqbidv 2561*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexeqbidv 2562*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	raleqbidva 2563*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexeqbidva 2564*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	mormo 2565	Unrestricted "at most one" implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	reu5 2566	Restricted uniqueness in terms of "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E* x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	reurex 2567	Restricted unique existence implies restricted existence. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1999.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	reurmo 2568	Restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	rmo5 2569	Restricted "at most one" in term of uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph -> E! x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	nrexrmo 2570	Nonexistence implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( -. E. x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	cbvralf 2571	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexf 2572	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvral 2573*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrex 2574*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvreu 2575*	Change the bound variable of a restricted uniqueness quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrmo 2576*	Change the bound variable of restricted "at most one" using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralv 2577*	Change the bound variable of a restricted universal quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexv 2578*	Change the bound variable of a restricted existential quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvreuv 2579*	Change the bound variable of a restricted uniqueness quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrmov 2580*	Change the bound variable of a restricted uniqueness quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvraldva2 2581*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	cbvrexdva2 2582*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	cbvraldva 2583*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. y e. A ch ) )
Theorem	cbvrexdva 2584*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. y e. A ch ) )
Theorem	cbvral2v 2585*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = w -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. z e. A A. w e. B ps )
Theorem	cbvrex2v 2586*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = w -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. z e. A E. w e. B ps )
Theorem	cbvral3v 2587*	Change bound variables of triple restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.)
|- ( x = w -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = v -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( z = u -> ( th <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ph <-> A. w e. A A. v e. B A. u e. C ps )
Theorem	cbvralsv 2588*	Change bound variable by using a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	cbvrexsv 2589*	Change bound variable by using a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Mar-2008.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbralie 2590*	Implicit to explicit substitution that swaps variables in a quantified expression. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [ x / y ] A. x e. y ph <-> A. y e. x ps )
Theorem	rabbiia 2591	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (inference rule). (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1999.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. A | ph } = { x e. A | ps }
Theorem	rabbidva 2592*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. A | ch } )
Theorem	rabbidv 2593*	Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction rule). (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1995.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. A | ch } )
Theorem	rabeqf 2594	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> { x e. A | ph } = { x e. B | ph } )
Theorem	rabeq 2595*	Equality theorem for restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A = B -> { x e. A | ph } = { x e. B | ph } )
Theorem	rabeqbidv 2596*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Dec-2009.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. B | ch } )
Theorem	rabeqbidva 2597*	Equality of restricted class abstractions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. B | ch } )
Theorem	rabeq2i 2598	Inference rule from equality of a class variable and a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
|- A = { x e. B | ph }   =>    |- ( x e. A <-> ( x e. B /\ ph ) )
Theorem	cbvrab 2599	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. This version has bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. A | ph } = { y e. A | ps }
Theorem	cbvrabv 2600*	Rule to change the bound variable in a restricted class abstraction, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1999.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- { x e. A | ph } = { y e. A | ps }