P. 35 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 3401-3500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Syntax	cop 3401	Extend class notation to include ordered pair.
class <. A , B >.
Syntax	cotp 3402	Extend class notation to include ordered triple.
class <. A , B , C >.
Theorem	snjust 3403*	Soundness justification theorem for df-sn 3404. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 28-Apr-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- { x | x = A } = { y | y = A }
Definition	df-sn 3404*	Define the singleton of a class. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. For convenience, it is well-defined for proper classes, i.e., those that are not elements of _V, although it is not very meaningful in this case. For an alternate definition see dfsn2 3412. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A } = { x | x = A }
Definition	df-pr 3405	Define unordered pair of classes. Definition 7.1 of [Quine] p. 48. They are unordered, so { A , B } = { B , A } as proven by prcom 3468. For a more traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfpr2 3417. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = ( { A } u. { B } )
Definition	df-tp 3406	Define unordered triple of classes. Definition of [Enderton] p. 19. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = ( { A , B } u. { C } )
Definition	df-op 3407*	Definition of an ordered pair, equivalent to Kuratowski's definition { { A } , { A , B } } when the arguments are sets. Since the behavior of Kuratowski definition is not very useful for proper classes, we define it to be empty in this case (see opprc1 3592 and opprc2 3593). For Kuratowski's actual definition when the arguments are sets, see dfop 3569. Definition 9.1 of [Quine] p. 58 defines an ordered pair unconditionally as <. A , B >. = { { A } , { A , B } }, which has different behavior from our df-op 3407 when the arguments are proper classes. Ordinarily this difference is not important, since neither definition is meaningful in that case. Our df-op 3407 was chosen because it often makes proofs shorter by eliminating unnecessary sethood hypotheses. There are other ways to define ordered pairs. The basic requirement is that two ordered pairs are equal iff their respective members are equal. In 1914 Norbert Wiener gave the first successful definition <. A , B >._2 = { { { A } , (/) } , { { B } } }. This was simplified by Kazimierz Kuratowski in 1921 to our present definition. An even simpler definition is <. A , B >._3 = { A , { A , B } }, but it requires the Axiom of Regularity for its justification and is not commonly used. Finally, an ordered pair of real numbers can be represented by a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B >. = { x | ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V /\ x e. { { A } , { A , B } } ) }
Definition	df-ot 3408	Define ordered triple of classes. Definition of ordered triple in [Stoll] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|- <. A , B , C >. = <. <. A , B >. , C >.
Theorem	sneq 3409	Equality theorem for singletons. Part of Exercise 4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	sneqi 3410	Equality inference for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A } = { B }
Theorem	sneqd 3411	Equality deduction for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A } = { B } )
Theorem	dfsn2 3412	Alternate definition of singleton. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A } = { A , A }
Theorem	elsng 3413	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn 3414	There is exactly one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	velsn 3415	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.)
|- ( x e. { A } <-> x = A )
Theorem	elsni 3416	There is only one element in a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. { B } -> A = B )
Theorem	dfpr2 3417*	Alternate definition of unordered pair. Definition 5.1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B ) }
Theorem	elprg 3418	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15, generalized. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) ) )
Theorem	elpr 3419	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-1995.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpr2 3420	A member of an unordered pair of classes is one or the other of them. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2005.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	elpri 3421	If a class is an element of a pair, then it is one of the two paired elements. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Apr-2011.)
|- ( A e. { B , C } -> ( A = B \/ A = C ) )
Theorem	nelpri 3422	If an element doesn't match the items in an unordered pair, it is not in the unordered pair. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- A =/= B   &    |- A =/= C   =>    |- -. A e. { B , C }
Theorem	snidg 3423	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snidb 3424	A class is a set iff it is a member of its singleton. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. _V <-> A e. { A } )
Theorem	snid 3425	A set is a member of its singleton. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. { A }
Theorem	vsnid 3426	A setvar variable is a member of its singleton (common case). (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 8-Dec-2018.)
|- x e. { x }
Theorem	elsn2g 3427	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. { B } <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	elsn2 3428	There is only one element in a singleton. Exercise 2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 15. This variation requires only that B, rather than A, be a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B } <-> A = B )
Theorem	mosn 3429*	A singleton has at most one element. This works whether A is a proper class or not, and in that sense can be seen as encompassing both snmg 3508 and snprc 3457. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Aug-2018.)
|- E* x x e. { A }
Theorem	ralsnsg 3430*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	ralsns 3431*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	rexsns 3432*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by NM, 22-Aug-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	ralsng 3433*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	rexsng 3434*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	exsnrex 3435	There is a set being the element of a singleton if and only if there is an element of the singleton. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jan-2018.)
|- ( E. x M = { x } <-> E. x e. M M = { x } )
Theorem	ralsn 3436*	Convert a quantification over a singleton to a substitution. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2009.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	rexsn 3437*	Restricted existential quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 5-Jan-2011.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A } ph <-> ps )
Theorem	eltpg 3438	Members of an unordered triple of classes. (Contributed by FL, 2-Feb-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) ) )
Theorem	eltpi 3439	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A e. { B , C , D } -> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	eltp 3440	A member of an unordered triple of classes is one of them. Special case of Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Feb-2015.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. { B , C , D } <-> ( A = B \/ A = C \/ A = D ) )
Theorem	dftp2 3441*	Alternate definition of unordered triple of classes. Special case of Definition 5.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- { A , B , C } = { x | ( x = A \/ x = B \/ x = C ) }
Theorem	nfpr 3442	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x { A , B }
Theorem	ralprg 3443*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	rexprg 3444*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) ) )
Theorem	raltpg 3445*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) )
Theorem	rextpg 3446*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ C e. X ) -> ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) ) )
Theorem	ralpr 3447*	Convert a quantification over a pair to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	rexpr 3448*	Convert an existential quantification over a pair to a disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) )
Theorem	raltp 3449*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) )
Theorem	rextp 3450*	Convert a quantification over a triple to a disjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( x = C -> ( ph <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. { A , B , C } ph <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ th ) )
Theorem	sbcsng 3451*	Substitution expressed in terms of quantification over a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	nfsn 3452	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for singletons. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { A }
Theorem	csbsng 3453	Distribute proper substitution through the singleton of a class. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> [_ A / x ]_ { B } = { [_ A / x ]_ B } )
Theorem	disjsn 3454	Intersection with the singleton of a non-member is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Sep-2014.)
|- ( ( A i^i { B } ) = (/) <-> -. B e. A )
Theorem	disjsn2 3455	Intersection of distinct singletons is disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.)
|- ( A =/= B -> ( { A } i^i { B } ) = (/) )
Theorem	disjpr2 3456	The intersection of distinct unordered pairs is disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.)
|- ( ( ( A =/= C /\ B =/= C ) /\ ( A =/= D /\ B =/= D ) ) -> ( { A , B } i^i { C , D } ) = (/) )
Theorem	snprc 3457	The singleton of a proper class (one that doesn't exist) is the empty set. Theorem 7.2 of [Quine] p. 48. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A e. _V <-> { A } = (/) )
Theorem	r19.12sn 3458*	Special case of r19.12 2466 where its converse holds. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 20-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( E. x e. { A } A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B E. x e. { A } ph ) )
Theorem	rabsn 3459*	Condition where a restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.)
|- ( B e. A -> { x e. A | x = B } = { B } )
Theorem	rabrsndc 3460*	A class abstraction over a decidable proposition restricted to a singleton is either the empty set or the singleton itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2018.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- DECID ph   =>    |- ( M = { x e. { A } | ph } -> ( M = (/) \/ M = { A } ) )
Theorem	euabsn2 3461*	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. y { x | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	euabsn 3462	Another way to express existential uniqueness of a wff: its class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( E! x ph <-> E. x { x | ph } = { x } )
Theorem	reusn 3463*	A way to express restricted existential uniqueness of a wff: its restricted class abstraction is a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E. y { x e. A | ph } = { y } )
Theorem	absneu 3464	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x ph )
Theorem	rabsneu 3465	Restricted existential uniqueness determined by a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ { x e. B | ph } = { A } ) -> E! x e. B ph )
Theorem	eusn 3466*	Two ways to express " A is a singleton." (Contributed by NM, 30-Oct-2010.)
|- ( E! x x e. A <-> E. x A = { x } )
Theorem	rabsnt 3467*	Truth implied by equality of a restricted class abstraction and a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- B e. _V   &    |- ( x = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( { x e. A | ph } = { B } -> ps )
Theorem	prcom 3468	Commutative law for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- { A , B } = { B , A }
Theorem	preq1 3469	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 29-Mar-1998.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C } = { B , C } )
Theorem	preq2 3470	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , A } = { C , B } )
Theorem	preq12 3471	Equality theorem for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ( A = C /\ B = D ) -> { A , B } = { C , D } )
Theorem	preq1i 3472	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { A , C } = { B , C }
Theorem	preq2i 3473	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   =>    |- { C , A } = { C , B }
Theorem	preq12i 3474	Equality inference for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- A = B   &    |- C = D   =>    |- { A , C } = { B , D }
Theorem	preq1d 3475	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C } = { B , C } )
Theorem	preq2d 3476	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , A } = { C , B } )
Theorem	preq12d 3477	Equality deduction for unordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2012.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C } = { B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq1 3478	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { A , C , D } = { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpeq2 3479	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , A , D } = { C , B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq3 3480	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> { C , D , A } = { C , D , B } )
Theorem	tpeq1d 3481	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C , D } = { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpeq2d 3482	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , A , D } = { C , B , D } )
Theorem	tpeq3d 3483	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> { C , D , A } = { C , D , B } )
Theorem	tpeq123d 3484	Equality theorem for unordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> C = D )   &    |- ( ph -> E = F )   =>    |- ( ph -> { A , C , E } = { B , D , F } )
Theorem	tprot 3485	Rotation of the elements of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.)
|- { A , B , C } = { B , C , A }
Theorem	tpcoma 3486	Swap 1st and 2nd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , C } = { B , A , C }
Theorem	tpcomb 3487	Swap 2nd and 3rd members of an undordered triple. (Contributed by NM, 22-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , C } = { A , C , B }
Theorem	tpass 3488	Split off the first element of an unordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
|- { A , B , C } = ( { A } u. { B , C } )
Theorem	qdass 3489	Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
|- ( { A , B } u. { C , D } ) = ( { A , B , C } u. { D } )
Theorem	qdassr 3490	Two ways to write an unordered quadruple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.)
|- ( { A , B } u. { C , D } ) = ( { A } u. { B , C , D } )
Theorem	tpidm12 3491	Unordered triple { A , A , B } is just an overlong way to write { A , B }. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- { A , A , B } = { A , B }
Theorem	tpidm13 3492	Unordered triple { A , B , A } is just an overlong way to write { A , B }. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , A } = { A , B }
Theorem	tpidm23 3493	Unordered triple { A , B , B } is just an overlong way to write { A , B }. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- { A , B , B } = { A , B }
Theorem	tpidm 3494	Unordered triple { A , A , A } is just an overlong way to write { A }. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 10-May-2015.)
|- { A , A , A } = { A }
Theorem	tppreq3 3495	An unordered triple is an unordered pair if one of its elements is identical with another element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 6-Oct-2017.)
|- ( B = C -> { A , B , C } = { A , B } )
Theorem	prid1g 3496	An unordered pair contains its first member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 8-Nov-2008.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. { A , B } )
Theorem	prid2g 3497	An unordered pair contains its second member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by Stefan Allan, 8-Nov-2008.)
|- ( B e. V -> B e. { A , B } )
Theorem	prid1 3498	An unordered pair contains its first member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. { A , B }
Theorem	prid2 3499	An unordered pair contains its second member. Part of Theorem 7.6 of [Quine] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- B e. { A , B }
Theorem	prprc1 3500	A proper class vanishes in an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> { A , B } = { B } )