Home | Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 44 of 108) | < Previous Next > |
Browser slow? Try the
Unicode version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | suc11 4301 | The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.) |
Theorem | dtruex 4302* | At least two sets exist (or in terms of first-order logic, the universe of discourse has two or more objects). Although dtruarb 3962 can also be summarized as "at least two sets exist", the difference is that dtruarb 3962 shows the existence of two sets which are not equal to each other, but this theorem says that given a specific , we can construct a set which does not equal it. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2018.) |
Theorem | dtru 4303* | At least two sets exist (or in terms of first-order logic, the universe of discourse has two or more objects). If we assumed the law of the excluded middle this would be equivalent to dtruex 4302. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2018.) |
Theorem | eunex 4304 | Existential uniqueness implies there is a value for which the wff argument is false. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2018.) |
Theorem | ordsoexmid 4305 | Weak linearity of ordinals implies the law of the excluded middle (that is, decidability of an arbitrary proposition). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Jan-2019.) |
Theorem | ordsuc 4306 | The successor of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.) (Constructive proof by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 20-Jul-2019.) |
Theorem | onsucuni2 4307 | A successor ordinal is the successor of its union. (Contributed by NM, 10-Dec-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
Theorem | 0elsucexmid 4308* | If the successor of any ordinal class contains the empty set, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Sep-2021.) |
Theorem | nlimsucg 4309 | A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
Theorem | ordpwsucss 4310 |
The collection of ordinals in the power class of an ordinal is a
superset of its successor.
We can think of as another possible definition of successor, which would be equivalent to df-suc 4126 given excluded middle. It is an ordinal, and has some successor-like properties. For example, if then both (onunisuci 4187) and (onuniss2 4256). Constructively and cannot be shown to be equivalent (as proved at ordpwsucexmid 4313). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2019.) |
Theorem | onnmin 4311 | No member of a set of ordinal numbers belongs to its minimum. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-1997.) (Constructive proof by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Jul-2019.) |
Theorem | ssnel 4312 | Relationship between subset and elementhood. In the context of ordinals this can be seen as an ordering law. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2019.) |
Theorem | ordpwsucexmid 4313* | The subset in ordpwsucss 4310 cannot be equality. That is, strengthening it to equality implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jul-2019.) |
Theorem | ordtri2or2exmid 4314* | Ordinal trichotomy implies excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.) |
Theorem | onintexmid 4315* | If the intersection (infimum) of an inhabited class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class, excluded middle follows. The hypothesis would be provable given excluded middle. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.) |
Theorem | zfregfr 4316 | The epsilon relation is well-founded on any class. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-1995.) |
Theorem | ordfr 4317 | Epsilon is well-founded on an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) |
Theorem | ordwe 4318 | Epsilon well-orders every ordinal. Proposition 7.4 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) |
Theorem | wetriext 4319* | A trichotomous well-order is extensional. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 26-Sep-2021.) |
Theorem | wessep 4320 | A subset of a set well-ordered by set membership is well-ordered by set membership. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.) |
Theorem | reg3exmidlemwe 4321* | Lemma for reg3exmid 4322. Our counterexample satisfies . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2021.) |
Theorem | reg3exmid 4322* | If any inhabited set satisfying df-wetr 4089 for has a minimal element, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Oct-2021.) |
Theorem | tfi 4323* |
The Principle of Transfinite Induction. Theorem 7.17 of [TakeutiZaring]
p. 39. This principle states that if is a class of ordinal
numbers with the property that every ordinal number included in
also belongs to , then every ordinal number is in .
(Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) |
Theorem | tfis 4324* | Transfinite Induction Schema. If all ordinal numbers less than a given number have a property (induction hypothesis), then all ordinal numbers have the property (conclusion). Exercise 25 of [Enderton] p. 200. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-Nov-2016.) |
Theorem | tfis2f 4325* | Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.) |
Theorem | tfis2 4326* | Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.) |
Theorem | tfis3 4327* | Transfinite Induction Schema, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2003.) |
Theorem | tfisi 4328* | A transfinite induction scheme in "implicit" form where the induction is done on an object derived from the object of interest. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Aug-2015.) |
Axiom | ax-iinf 4329* | Axiom of Infinity. Axiom 5 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF". (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Nov-2018.) |
Theorem | zfinf2 4330* | A standard version of the Axiom of Infinity, using definitions to abbreviate. Axiom Inf of [BellMachover] p. 472. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) |
Syntax | com 4331 | Extend class notation to include the class of natural numbers. |
Definition | df-iom 4332* |
Define the class of natural numbers as the smallest inductive set, which
is valid provided we assume the Axiom of Infinity. Definition 6.3 of
[Eisenberg] p. 82.
Note: the natural numbers are a subset of the ordinal numbers df-on 4123. Later, when we define complex numbers, we will be able to also define a subset of the complex numbers with analogous properties and operations, but they will be different sets. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) Use its alias dfom3 4333 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.) |
Theorem | dfom3 4333* | Alias for df-iom 4332. Use it instead of df-iom 4332 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) |
Theorem | omex 4334 | The existence of omega (the class of natural numbers). Axiom 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1994.) |
Theorem | peano1 4335 | Zero is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.) |
Theorem | peano2 4336 | The successor of any natural number is a natural number. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.) |
Theorem | peano3 4337 | The successor of any natural number is not zero. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.) |
Theorem | peano4 4338 | Two natural numbers are equal iff their successors are equal, i.e. the successor function is one-to-one. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.) |
Theorem | peano5 4339* | The induction postulate: any class containing zero and closed under the successor operation contains all natural numbers. One of Peano's five postulates for arithmetic. Proposition 7.30(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The more traditional statement of mathematical induction as a theorem schema, with a basis and an induction step, is derived from this theorem as theorem findes 4344. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) |
Theorem | find 4340* | The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-2001. The hypothesis states that is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to , and given any member of the member's successor also belongs to . The conclusion is that every natural number is in . (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.) |
Theorem | finds 4341* | Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) |
Theorem | finds2 4342* | Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2002.) |
Theorem | finds1 4343* | Principle of Finite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first three hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last two are the basis and the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 22-Mar-2006.) |
Theorem | findes 4344 | Finite induction with explicit substitution. The first hypothesis is the basis and the second is the induction step. Theorem Schema 22 of [Suppes] p. 136. This is an alternative for Metamath 100 proof #74. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 9-Jul-2003.) |
Theorem | nn0suc 4345* | A natural number is either 0 or a successor. Similar theorems for arbitrary sets or real numbers will not be provable (without the law of the excluded middle), but equality of natural numbers is decidable. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) |
Theorem | elnn 4346 | A member of a natural number is a natural number. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) |
Theorem | ordom 4347 | Omega is ordinal. Theorem 7.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) |
Theorem | omelon2 4348 | Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.) |
Theorem | omelon 4349 | Omega is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2013.) |
Theorem | nnon 4350 | A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.) |
Theorem | nnoni 4351 | A natural number is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-1994.) |
Theorem | nnord 4352 | A natural number is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1995.) |
Theorem | omsson 4353 | Omega is a subset of . (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.) |
Theorem | limom 4354 | Omega is a limit ordinal. Theorem 2.8 of [BellMachover] p. 473. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1995.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.) |
Theorem | peano2b 4355 | A class belongs to omega iff its successor does. (Contributed by NM, 3-Dec-1995.) |
Theorem | nnsuc 4356* | A nonzero natural number is a successor. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) |
Theorem | nndceq0 4357 | A natural number is either zero or nonzero. Decidable equality for natural numbers is a special case of the law of the excluded middle which holds in most constructive set theories including ours. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jan-2019.) |
DECID | ||
Theorem | 0elnn 4358 | A natural number is either the empty set or has the empty set as an element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Aug-2019.) |
Theorem | nn0eln0 4359 | A natural number is nonempty iff it contains the empty set. Although in constructive mathematics it is generally more natural to work with inhabited sets and ignore the whole concept of nonempty sets, in the specific case of natural numbers this theorem may be helpful in converting proofs which were written assuming excluded middle. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Aug-2019.) |
Theorem | nnregexmid 4360* | If inhabited sets of natural numbers always have minimal elements, excluded middle follows. The argument is essentially the same as regexmid 4278 and the larger lesson is that although natural numbers may behave "non-constructively" even in a constructive set theory (for example see nndceq 6100 or nntri3or 6095), sets of natural numbers are a different animal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2019.) |
Syntax | cxp 4361 | Extend the definition of a class to include the cross product. |
Syntax | ccnv 4362 | Extend the definition of a class to include the converse of a class. |
Syntax | cdm 4363 | Extend the definition of a class to include the domain of a class. |
Syntax | crn 4364 | Extend the definition of a class to include the range of a class. |
Syntax | cres 4365 | Extend the definition of a class to include the restriction of a class. (Read: The restriction of to .) |
Syntax | cima 4366 | Extend the definition of a class to include the image of a class. (Read: The image of under .) |
Syntax | ccom 4367 | Extend the definition of a class to include the composition of two classes. (Read: The composition of and .) |
Syntax | wrel 4368 | Extend the definition of a wff to include the relation predicate. (Read: is a relation.) |
Definition | df-xp 4369* | Define the cross product of two classes. Definition 9.11 of [Quine] p. 64. For example, ( { 1 , 5 } { 2 , 7 } ) = ( { 1 , 2 , 1 , 7 } { 5 , 2 , 5 , 7 } ) . Another example is that the set of rational numbers are defined in using the cross-product ( Z N ) ; the left- and right-hand sides of the cross-product represent the top (integer) and bottom (natural) numbers of a fraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Definition | df-rel 4370 | Define the relation predicate. Definition 6.4(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23. For alternate definitions, see dfrel2 4791 and dfrel3 4798. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
Definition | df-cnv 4371* | Define the converse of a class. Definition 9.12 of [Quine] p. 64. The converse of a binary relation swaps its arguments, i.e., if and then , as proven in brcnv 4536 (see df-br 3786 and df-rel 4370 for more on relations). For example, { 2 , 6 , 3 , 9 } = { 6 , 2 , 9 , 3 } . We use Quine's breve accent (smile) notation. Like Quine, we use it as a prefix, which eliminates the need for parentheses. Many authors use the postfix superscript "to the minus one." "Converse" is Quine's terminology; some authors call it "inverse," especially when the argument is a function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Definition | df-co 4372* | Define the composition of two classes. Definition 6.6(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. Note that Definition 7 of [Suppes] p. 63 reverses and , uses a slash instead of , and calls the operation "relative product." (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Definition | df-dm 4373* | Define the domain of a class. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 59. For example, F = { 2 , 6 , 3 , 9 } dom F = { 2 , 3 } . Contrast with range (defined in df-rn 4374). For alternate definitions see dfdm2 4872, dfdm3 4540, and dfdm4 4545. The notation " " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script D. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
Definition | df-rn 4374 | Define the range of a class. For example, F = { 2 , 6 , 3 , 9 } -> ran F = { 6 , 9 } . Contrast with domain (defined in df-dm 4373). For alternate definitions, see dfrn2 4541, dfrn3 4542, and dfrn4 4801. The notation " " is used by Enderton; other authors sometimes use script R or script W. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) |
Definition | df-res 4375 | Define the restriction of a class. Definition 6.6(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example ( F = { 2 , 6 , 3 , 9 } B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F B ) = { 2 , 6 } . (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) |
Definition | df-ima 4376 | Define the image of a class (as restricted by another class). Definition 6.6(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. For example, ( F = { 2 , 6 , 3 , 9 } /\ B = { 1 , 2 } ) -> ( F B ) = { 6 } . Contrast with restriction (df-res 4375) and range (df-rn 4374). For an alternate definition, see dfima2 4690. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-1994.) |
Theorem | xpeq1 4377 | Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Theorem | xpeq2 4378 | Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jul-1994.) |
Theorem | elxpi 4379* | Membership in a cross product. Uses fewer axioms than elxp 4380. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Theorem | elxp 4380* | Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.) |
Theorem | elxp2 4381* | Membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) |
Theorem | xpeq12 4382 | Equality theorem for cross product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) |
Theorem | xpeq1i 4383 | Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
Theorem | xpeq2i 4384 | Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2008.) |
Theorem | xpeq12i 4385 | Equality inference for cross product. (Contributed by FL, 31-Aug-2009.) |
Theorem | xpeq1d 4386 | Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.) |
Theorem | xpeq2d 4387 | Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 17-Jun-2010.) |
Theorem | xpeq12d 4388 | Equality deduction for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) |
Theorem | nfxp 4389 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for cross product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
Theorem | 0nelxp 4390 | The empty set is not a member of a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
Theorem | 0nelelxp 4391 | A member of a cross product (ordered pair) doesn't contain the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.) |
Theorem | opelxp 4392 | Ordered pair membership in a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
Theorem | brxp 4393 | Binary relation on a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) |
Theorem | opelxpi 4394 | Ordered pair membership in a cross product (implication). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) |
Theorem | opelxp1 4395 | The first member of an ordered pair of classes in a cross product belongs to first cross product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
Theorem | opelxp2 4396 | The second member of an ordered pair of classes in a cross product belongs to second cross product argument. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
Theorem | otelxp1 4397 | The first member of an ordered triple of classes in a cross product belongs to first cross product argument. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) |
Theorem | rabxp 4398* | Membership in a class builder restricted to a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 20-Feb-2014.) |
Theorem | brrelex12 4399 | A true binary relation on a relation implies the arguments are sets. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
Theorem | brrelex 4400 | A true binary relation on a relation implies the first argument is a set. (This is a property of our ordered pair definition.) (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |