P. 63 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6201-6300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	iinerm 6201*	The intersection of a nonempty family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( E. y y e. A /\ A. x e. A R Er B ) -> |^|_ x e. A R Er B )
Theorem	riinerm 6202*	The relative intersection of a family of equivalence relations is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( E. y y e. A /\ A. x e. A R Er B ) -> ( ( B X. B ) i^i |^|_ x e. A R ) Er B )
Theorem	erinxp 6203	A restricted equivalence relation is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ph -> R Er A )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( R i^i ( B X. B ) ) Er B )
Theorem	ecinxp 6204	Restrict the relation in an equivalence class to a base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jul-2015.)
|- ( ( ( R " A ) C_ A /\ B e. A ) -> [ B ] R = [ B ] ( R i^i ( A X. A ) ) )
Theorem	qsinxp 6205	Restrict the equivalence relation in a quotient set to the base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ( R " A ) C_ A -> ( A /. R ) = ( A /. ( R i^i ( A X. A ) ) ) )
Theorem	qsel 6206	If an element of a quotient set contains a given element, it is equal to the equivalence class of the element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- ( ( R Er X /\ B e. ( A /. R ) /\ C e. B ) -> B = [ C ] R )
Theorem	qliftlem 6207*	F, a function lift, is a subset of R X. S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> [ x ] R e. ( X /. R ) )
Theorem	qliftrel 6208*	F, a function lift, is a subset of R X. S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> F C_ ( ( X /. R ) X. Y ) )
Theorem	qliftel 6209*	Elementhood in the relation F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ C ] R F D <-> E. x e. X ( C R x /\ D = A ) ) )
Theorem	qliftel1 6210*	Elementhood in the relation F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> [ x ] R F A )
Theorem	qliftfun 6211*	The function F is the unique function defined by F ` [ x ] = A, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   &    |- ( x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( Fun F <-> A. x A. y ( x R y -> A = B ) ) )
Theorem	qliftfund 6212*	The function F is the unique function defined by F ` [ x ] = A, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   &    |- ( x = y -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x R y ) -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> Fun F )
Theorem	qliftfuns 6213*	The function F is the unique function defined by F ` [ x ] = A, provided that the well-definedness condition holds. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( Fun F <-> A. y A. z ( y R z -> [_ y / x ]_ A = [_ z / x ]_ A ) ) )
Theorem	qliftf 6214*	The domain and range of the function F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( Fun F <-> F : ( X /. R ) --> Y ) )
Theorem	qliftval 6215*	The value of the function F. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
|- F = ran ( x e. X |-> <. [ x ] R , A >. )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. X ) -> A e. Y )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er X )   &    |- ( ph -> X e. _V )   &    |- ( x = C -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> Fun F )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ C e. X ) -> ( F ` [ C ] R ) = B )
Theorem	ecoptocl 6216*	Implicit substitution of class for equivalence class of ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
|- S = ( ( B X. C ) /. R )   &    |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] R = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. B /\ y e. C ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( A e. S -> ps )
Theorem	2ecoptocl 6217*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-1995.)
|- S = ( ( C X. D ) /. R )   &    |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] R = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( [ <. z , w >. ] R = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. C /\ y e. D ) /\ ( z e. C /\ w e. D ) ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) -> ch )
Theorem	3ecoptocl 6218*	Implicit substitution of classes for equivalence classes of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.)
|- S = ( ( D X. D ) /. R )   &    |- ( [ <. x , y >. ] R = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( [ <. z , w >. ] R = B -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( [ <. v , u >. ] R = C -> ( ch <-> th ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. D /\ y e. D ) /\ ( z e. D /\ w e. D ) /\ ( v e. D /\ u e. D ) ) -> ph )   =>    |- ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S /\ C e. S ) -> th )
Theorem	brecop 6219*	Binary relation on a quotient set. Lemma for real number construction. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-1996.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( G X. G )   &    |- H = ( ( G X. G ) /. .~ )   &    |- .<_ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. H /\ y e. H ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = [ <. z , w >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) /\ ph ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( ( z e. G /\ w e. G ) /\ ( A e. G /\ B e. G ) ) /\ ( ( v e. G /\ u e. G ) /\ ( C e. G /\ D e. G ) ) ) -> ( ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ = [ <. A , B >. ] .~ /\ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ = [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. G /\ B e. G ) /\ ( C e. G /\ D e. G ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ .<_ [ <. C , D >. ] .~ <-> ps ) )
Theorem	eroveu 6220*	Lemma for eroprf 6222. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- J = ( A /. R )   &    |- K = ( B /. S )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> S Er V )   &    |- ( ph -> T Er W )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ V )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ W )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. B ) --> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. B /\ u e. B ) ) ) -> ( ( r R s /\ t S u ) -> ( r .+ t ) T ( s .+ u ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ( X e. J /\ Y e. K ) ) -> E! z E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( X = [ p ] R /\ Y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) )
Theorem	erovlem 6221*	Lemma for eroprf 6222. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- J = ( A /. R )   &    |- K = ( B /. S )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> S Er V )   &    |- ( ph -> T Er W )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ V )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ W )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. B ) --> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. B /\ u e. B ) ) ) -> ( ( r R s /\ t S u ) -> ( r .+ t ) T ( s .+ u ) ) )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( x = [ p ] R /\ y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) }   =>    |- ( ph -> .+^ = ( x e. J , y e. K |-> ( iota z E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( x = [ p ] R /\ y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) ) ) )
Theorem	eroprf 6222*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2014.)
|- J = ( A /. R )   &    |- K = ( B /. S )   &    |- ( ph -> T e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> R Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> S Er V )   &    |- ( ph -> T Er W )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ V )   &    |- ( ph -> C C_ W )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. B ) --> C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. B /\ u e. B ) ) ) -> ( ( r R s /\ t S u ) -> ( r .+ t ) T ( s .+ u ) ) )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. B ( ( x = [ p ] R /\ y = [ q ] S ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] T ) }   &    |- ( ph -> R e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. Y )   &    |- L = ( C /. T )   =>    |- ( ph -> .+^ : ( J X. K ) --> L )
Theorem	eroprf2 6223*	Functionality of an operation defined on equivalence classes. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 10-Jun-2010.)
|- J = ( A /. .~ )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | E. p e. A E. q e. A ( ( x = [ p ] .~ /\ y = [ q ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( p .+ q ) ] .~ ) }   &    |- ( ph -> .~ e. X )   &    |- ( ph -> .~ Er U )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ U )   &    |- ( ph -> .+ : ( A X. A ) --> A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( ( r e. A /\ s e. A ) /\ ( t e. A /\ u e. A ) ) ) -> ( ( r .~ s /\ t .~ u ) -> ( r .+ t ) .~ ( s .+ u ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> .+^ : ( J X. J ) --> J )
Theorem	ecopoveq 6224*	This is the first of several theorems about equivalence relations of the kind used in construction of fractions and signed reals, involving operations on equivalent classes of ordered pairs. This theorem expresses the relation .~ (specified by the hypothesis) in terms of its operation F. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1995.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( <. A , B >. .~ <. C , D >. <-> ( A .+ D ) = ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecopovsym 6225*	Assuming the operation F is commutative, show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by NM, 27-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   =>    |- ( A .~ B -> B .~ A )
Theorem	ecopovtrn 6226*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A .~ B /\ B .~ C ) -> A .~ C )
Theorem	ecopover 6227*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )
Theorem	ecopovsymg 6228*	Assuming the operation F is commutative, show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is symmetric. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   =>    |- ( A .~ B -> B .~ A )
Theorem	ecopovtrng 6229*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is transitive. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- ( ( A .~ B /\ B .~ C ) -> A .~ C )
Theorem	ecopoverg 6230*	Assuming that operation F is commutative (second hypothesis), closed (third hypothesis), associative (fourth hypothesis), and has the cancellation property (fifth hypothesis), show that the relation .~, specified by the first hypothesis, is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2019.)
|- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ( z .+ u ) = ( w .+ v ) ) ) }   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) = ( y .+ x ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) -> ( x .+ y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) .+ z ) = ( x .+ ( y .+ z ) ) )   &    |- ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S /\ z e. S ) -> ( ( x .+ y ) = ( x .+ z ) -> y = z ) )   =>    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )
Theorem	th3qlem1 6231*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. The third hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- .~ Er S   &    |- ( ( ( y e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ v e. S ) ) -> ( ( y .~ w /\ z .~ v ) -> ( y .+ z ) .~ ( w .+ v ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. ( S /. .~ ) /\ B e. ( S /. .~ ) ) -> E* x E. y E. z ( ( A = [ y ] .~ /\ B = [ z ] .~ ) /\ x = [ ( y .+ z ) ] .~ ) )
Theorem	th3qlem2 6232*	Lemma for Exercise 44 version of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. The fourth hypothesis is the compatibility assumption. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2015.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ B e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) -> E* z E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( A = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ B = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) )
Theorem	th3qcor 6233*	Corollary of Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60. (Contributed by NM, 12-Nov-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   &    |- G = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ y e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   =>    |- Fun G
Theorem	th3q 6234*	Theorem 3Q of [Enderton] p. 60, extended to operations on ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
|- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- ( ( ( ( w e. S /\ v e. S ) /\ ( u e. S /\ t e. S ) ) /\ ( ( s e. S /\ f e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( <. w , v >. .~ <. u , t >. /\ <. s , f >. .~ <. g , h >. ) -> ( <. w , v >. .+ <. s , f >. ) .~ ( <. u , t >. .+ <. g , h >. ) ) )   &    |- G = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) /\ y e. ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. t ( ( x = [ <. w , v >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. u , t >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. w , v >. .+ <. u , t >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ G [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) = [ ( <. A , B >. .+ <. C , D >. ) ] .~ )
Theorem	oviec 6235*	Express an operation on equivalence classes of ordered pairs in terms of equivalence class of operations on ordered pairs. See iset.mm for additional comments describing the hypotheses. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> H e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( a e. S /\ b e. S ) /\ ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) ) -> K e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( c e. S /\ d e. S ) /\ ( t e. S /\ s e. S ) ) -> L e. ( S X. S ) )   &    |- .~ e. _V   &    |- .~ Er ( S X. S )   &    |- .~ = { <. x , y >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. z E. w E. v E. u ( ( x = <. z , w >. /\ y = <. v , u >. ) /\ ph ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( z = a /\ w = b ) /\ ( v = c /\ u = d ) ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z = g /\ w = h ) /\ ( v = t /\ u = s ) ) -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- .+ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. ( S X. S ) /\ y e. ( S X. S ) ) /\ E. w E. v E. u E. f ( ( x = <. w , v >. /\ y = <. u , f >. ) /\ z = J ) ) }   &    |- ( ( ( w = a /\ v = b ) /\ ( u = g /\ f = h ) ) -> J = K )   &    |- ( ( ( w = c /\ v = d ) /\ ( u = t /\ f = s ) ) -> J = L )   &    |- ( ( ( w = A /\ v = B ) /\ ( u = C /\ f = D ) ) -> J = H )   &    |- .+^ = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. Q /\ y e. Q ) /\ E. a E. b E. c E. d ( ( x = [ <. a , b >. ] .~ /\ y = [ <. c , d >. ] .~ ) /\ z = [ ( <. a , b >. .+ <. c , d >. ) ] .~ ) ) }   &    |- Q = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( ( a e. S /\ b e. S ) /\ ( c e. S /\ d e. S ) ) /\ ( ( g e. S /\ h e. S ) /\ ( t e. S /\ s e. S ) ) ) -> ( ( ps /\ ch ) -> K .~ L ) )   =>    |- ( ( ( A e. S /\ B e. S ) /\ ( C e. S /\ D e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. A , B >. ] .~ .+^ [ <. C , D >. ] .~ ) = [ H ] .~ )
Theorem	ecovcom 6236*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. Most uses will want ecovicom 6237 instead. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- D = H   &    |- G = J   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )
Theorem	ecovicom 6237*	Lemma used to transfer a commutative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2019.)
|- C = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. D , G >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. x , y >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> D = H )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> G = J )   =>    |- ( ( A e. C /\ B e. C ) -> ( A .+ B ) = ( B .+ A ) )
Theorem	ecovass 6238*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. In most cases ecoviass 6239 will be more useful. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. G , H >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. G , H >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. J , K >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ ) = [ <. L , M >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) )   &    |- J = L   &    |- K = M   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( ( A .+ B ) .+ C ) = ( A .+ ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecoviass 6239*	Lemma used to transfer an associative law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2019.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. G , H >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. G , H >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. J , K >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .+ [ <. N , Q >. ] .~ ) = [ <. L , M >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( G e. S /\ H e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( N e. S /\ Q e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> J = L )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> K = M )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( ( A .+ B ) .+ C ) = ( A .+ ( B .+ C ) ) )
Theorem	ecovdi 6240*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. Most likely ecovidi 6241 will be more helpful. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 4-Jun-2013.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. M , N >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. M , N >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. W , X >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) /\ ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. W , X >. ] .~ .+ [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ ) = [ <. K , L >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) )   &    |- H = K   &    |- J = L   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( A .x. ( B .+ C ) ) = ( ( A .x. B ) .+ ( A .x. C ) ) )
Theorem	ecovidi 6241*	Lemma used to transfer a distributive law via an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Sep-2019.)
|- D = ( ( S X. S ) /. .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. z , w >. ] .~ .+ [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. M , N >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. M , N >. ] .~ ) = [ <. H , J >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. z , w >. ] .~ ) = [ <. W , X >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. x , y >. ] .~ .x. [ <. v , u >. ] .~ ) = [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) /\ ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) ) -> ( [ <. W , X >. ] .~ .+ [ <. Y , Z >. ] .~ ) = [ <. K , L >. ] .~ )   &    |- ( ( ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( M e. S /\ N e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) ) -> ( W e. S /\ X e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> ( Y e. S /\ Z e. S ) )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> H = K )   &    |- ( ( ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) /\ ( z e. S /\ w e. S ) /\ ( v e. S /\ u e. S ) ) -> J = L )   =>    |- ( ( A e. D /\ B e. D /\ C e. D ) -> ( A .x. ( B .+ C ) ) = ( ( A .x. B ) .+ ( A .x. C ) ) )
2.6.25  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 6242	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ~~
Syntax	cdom 6243	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly less-than-or-equal)
class ~<_
Syntax	cfn 6244	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 6245*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ~~ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 6251. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-onto-> y }
Definition	df-dom 6246*	Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6254 and domen 6255. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~<_ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-> y }
Definition	df-fin 6247*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our " a e. Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 10771. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- Fin = { x | E. y e. om x ~~ y }
Theorem	relen 6248	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~~
Theorem	reldom 6249	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~<_
Theorem	encv 6250	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	bren 6251*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	brdomg 6252*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	brdomi 6253*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~<_ B -> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	brdom 6254*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	domen 6255*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) )
Theorem	domeng 6256*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) ) )
Theorem	f1oen3g 6257	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6260 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1oen2g 6258	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 6260 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom2g 6259	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 6261 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	f1oeng 6260	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1domg 6261	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	f1oen 6262	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom 6263	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	isfi 6264*	Express " A is finite." Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose " Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A e. Fin <-> E. x e. om A ~~ x )
Theorem	enssdom 6265	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ C_ ~<_
Theorem	endom 6266	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	enrefg 6267	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~~ A )
Theorem	enref 6268	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A ~~ A
Theorem	eqeng 6269	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	domrefg 6270	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~<_ A )
Theorem	en2d 6271*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en3d 6272*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. A ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en2i 6273*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. _V )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. _V )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	en3i 6274*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	dom2lem 6275*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> C ) : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	dom2d 6276*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B e. R -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	dom3d 6277*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom2 6278*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( B e. V -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom3 6279*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	idssen 6280	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- _I C_ ~~
Theorem	ssdomg 6281	A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A C_ B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	ener 6282	Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ~~ Er _V
Theorem	ensymb 6283	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensym 6284	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	ensymi 6285	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   =>    |- B ~~ A
Theorem	ensymd 6286	Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 6284. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A ~~ B )   =>    |- ( ph -> B ~~ A )
Theorem	entr 6287	Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~~ C )
Theorem	domtr 6288	Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	entri 6289	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	entr2i 6290	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- B ~~ C   =>    |- C ~~ A
Theorem	entr3i 6291	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- A ~~ C   =>    |- B ~~ C
Theorem	entr4i 6292	A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A ~~ B   &    |- C ~~ B   =>    |- A ~~ C
Theorem	endomtr 6293	Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~~ B /\ B ~<_ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	domentr 6294	Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A ~<_ B /\ B ~~ C ) -> A ~<_ C )
Theorem	f1imaeng 6295	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A /\ C e. V ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen2g 6296	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6297 does not need ax-setind 4280.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ B e. V ) /\ ( C C_ A /\ C e. V ) ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	f1imaen 6297	A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
|- C e. _V   =>    |- ( ( F : A -1-1-> B /\ C C_ A ) -> ( F " C ) ~~ C )
Theorem	en0 6298	The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 88. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ (/) <-> A = (/) )
Theorem	ensn1 6299	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- { A } ~~ 1o
Theorem	ensn1g 6300	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> { A } ~~ 1o )