P. 29 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2801-2900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	cdeqri 2801	Property of conditional equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ph )   =>    |- ( x = y -> ph )
Theorem	cdeqth 2802	Deduce conditional equality from a theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ph   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ph )
Theorem	cdeqnot 2803	Distribute conditional equality over negation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( -. ph <-> -. ps ) )
Theorem	cdeqal 2804*	Distribute conditional equality over quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( A. z ph <-> A. z ps ) )
Theorem	cdeqab 2805*	Distribute conditional equality over abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> { z | ph } = { z | ps } )
Theorem	cdeqal1 2806*	Distribute conditional equality over quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( A. x ph <-> A. y ps ) )
Theorem	cdeqab1 2807*	Distribute conditional equality over abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> { x | ph } = { y | ps } )
Theorem	cdeqim 2808	Distribute conditional equality over implication. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ch <-> th ) )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ( ph -> ch ) <-> ( ps -> th ) ) )
Theorem	cdeqcv 2809	Conditional equality for set-to-class promotion. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> x = y )
Theorem	cdeqeq 2810	Distribute conditional equality over equality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> A = B )   &    |- CondEq ( x = y -> C = D )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( A = C <-> B = D ) )
Theorem	cdeqel 2811	Distribute conditional equality over elementhood. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- CondEq ( x = y -> A = B )   &    |- CondEq ( x = y -> C = D )   =>    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( A e. C <-> B e. D ) )
Theorem	nfcdeq 2812*	If we have a conditional equality proof, where ph is ph ( x ) and ps is ph ( y ), and ph ( x ) in fact does not have x free in it according to F/, then ph ( x ) <-> ph ( y ) unconditionally. This proves that F/ x ph is actually a not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- CondEq ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph <-> ps )
Theorem	nfccdeq 2813*	Variation of nfcdeq 2812 for classes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- CondEq ( x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- A = B
2.1.8  Russell's Paradox
Theorem	ru 2814	Russell's Paradox. Proposition 4.14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 14. In the late 1800s, Frege's Axiom of (unrestricted) Comprehension, expressed in our notation as A e. _V, asserted that any collection of sets A is a set i.e. belongs to the universe _V of all sets. In particular, by substituting { x | x e/ x } (the "Russell class") for A, it asserted { x | x e/ x } e. _V, meaning that the "collection of all sets which are not members of themselves" is a set. However, here we prove { x | x e/ x } e/ _V. This contradiction was discovered by Russell in 1901 (published in 1903), invalidating the Comprehension Axiom and leading to the collapse of Frege's system. In 1908, Zermelo rectified this fatal flaw by replacing Comprehension with a weaker Subset (or Separation) Axiom asserting that A is a set only when it is smaller than some other set B. The intuitionistic set theory IZF includes such a separation axiom, Axiom 6 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF", which we include as ax-sep 3896. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
|- { x | x e/ x } e/ _V
2.1.9  Proper substitution of classes for sets
Syntax	wsbc 2815	Extend wff notation to include the proper substitution of a class for a set. Read this notation as "the proper substitution of class A for setvar variable x in wff ph."
wff [. A / x ]. ph
Definition	df-sbc 2816	Define the proper substitution of a class for a set. When A is a proper class, our definition evaluates to false. This is somewhat arbitrary: we could have, instead, chosen the conclusion of sbc6 2840 for our definition, which always evaluates to true for proper classes. Our definition also does not produce the same results as discussed in the proof of Theorem 6.6 of [Quine] p. 42 (although Theorem 6.6 itself does hold, as shown by dfsbcq 2817 below). Unfortunately, Quine's definition requires a recursive syntactical breakdown of ph, and it does not seem possible to express it with a single closed formula. If we did not want to commit to any specific proper class behavior, we could use this definition only to prove theorem dfsbcq 2817, which holds for both our definition and Quine's, and from which we can derive a weaker version of df-sbc 2816 in the form of sbc8g 2822. However, the behavior of Quine's definition at proper classes is similarly arbitrary, and for practical reasons (to avoid having to prove sethood of A in every use of this definition) we allow direct reference to df-sbc 2816 and assert that [. A / x ]. ph is always false when A is a proper class. The related definition df-csb defines proper substitution into a class variable (as opposed to a wff variable). (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Revised by NM, 25-Dec-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A e. { x | ph } )
Theorem	dfsbcq 2817	This theorem, which is similar to Theorem 6.7 of [Quine] p. 42 and holds under both our definition and Quine's, provides us with a weak definition of the proper substitution of a class for a set. Since our df-sbc 2816 does not result in the same behavior as Quine's for proper classes, if we wished to avoid conflict with Quine's definition we could start with this theorem and dfsbcq2 2818 instead of df-sbc 2816. (dfsbcq2 2818 is needed because unlike Quine we do not overload the df-sb 1686 syntax.) As a consequence of these theorems, we can derive sbc8g 2822, which is a weaker version of df-sbc 2816 that leaves substitution undefined when A is a proper class. However, it is often a nuisance to have to prove the sethood hypothesis of sbc8g 2822, so we will allow direct use of df-sbc 2816. Proper substiution with a proper class is rarely needed, and when it is, we can simply use the expansion of Quine's definition. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. B / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	dfsbcq2 2818	This theorem, which is similar to Theorem 6.7 of [Quine] p. 42 and holds under both our definition and Quine's, relates logic substitution df-sb 1686 and substitution for class variables df-sbc 2816. Unlike Quine, we use a different syntax for each in order to avoid overloading it. See remarks in dfsbcq 2817. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2016.)
|- ( y = A -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbsbc 2819	Show that df-sb 1686 and df-sbc 2816 are equivalent when the class term A in df-sbc 2816 is a setvar variable. This theorem lets us reuse theorems based on df-sb 1686 for proofs involving df-sbc 2816. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [. y / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbceq1d 2820	Equality theorem for class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Revised by NM, 30-Jun-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> [. B / x ]. ps ) )
Theorem	sbceq1dd 2821	Equality theorem for class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.) (Revised by NM, 30-Jun-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> [. A / x ]. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> [. B / x ]. ps )
Theorem	sbc8g 2822	This is the closest we can get to df-sbc 2816 if we start from dfsbcq 2817 (see its comments) and dfsbcq2 2818. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A e. { x | ph } ) )
Theorem	sbcex 2823	By our definition of proper substitution, it can only be true if the substituted expression is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ph -> A e. _V )
Theorem	sbceq1a 2824	Equality theorem for class substitution. Class version of sbequ12 1694. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2003.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbceq2a 2825	Equality theorem for class substitution. Class version of sbequ12r 1695. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2017.)
|- ( A = x -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	spsbc 2826	Specialization: if a formula is true for all sets, it is true for any class which is a set. Similar to Theorem 6.11 of [Quine] p. 44. See also stdpc4 1698 and rspsbc 2896. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ph -> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	spsbcd 2827	Specialization: if a formula is true for all sets, it is true for any class which is a set. Similar to Theorem 6.11 of [Quine] p. 44. See also stdpc4 1698 and rspsbc 2896. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A. x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> [. A / x ]. ps )
Theorem	sbcth 2828	A substitution into a theorem remains true (when A is a set). (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2005.)
|- ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcthdv 2829*	Deduction version of sbcth 2828. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A e. V ) -> [. A / x ]. ps )
Theorem	sbcid 2830	An identity theorem for substitution. See sbid 1697. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Feb-2017.)
|- ( [. x / x ]. ph <-> ph )
Theorem	nfsbc1d 2831	Deduction version of nfsbc1 2832. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x [. A / x ]. ps )
Theorem	nfsbc1 2832	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x [. A / x ]. ph
Theorem	nfsbc1v 2833*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x [. A / x ]. ph
Theorem	nfsbcd 2834	Deduction version of nfsbc 2835. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x [. A / y ]. ps )
Theorem	nfsbc 2835	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x [. A / y ]. ph
Theorem	sbcco 2836*	A composition law for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( [. A / y ]. [. y / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcco2 2837*	A composition law for class substitution. Importantly, x may occur free in the class expression substituted for A. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( x = y -> A = B )   =>    |- ( [. x / y ]. [. B / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbc5 2838*	An equivalence for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> E. x ( x = A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	sbc6g 2839*	An equivalence for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sbc6 2840*	An equivalence for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 17-Jan-2007.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> A. x ( x = A -> ph ) )
Theorem	sbc7 2841*	An equivalence for class substitution in the spirit of df-clab 2068. Note that x and A don't have to be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> E. y ( y = A /\ [. y / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	cbvsbc 2842	Change bound variables in a wff substitution. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 19-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. A / y ]. ps )
Theorem	cbvsbcv 2843*	Change the bound variable of a class substitution using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. A / y ]. ps )
Theorem	sbciegft 2844*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, using a bound-variable hypothesis instead of distinct variables. (Closed theorem version of sbciegf 2845.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ps /\ A. x ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	sbciegf 2845*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	sbcieg 2846*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2005.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	sbcie2g 2847*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. This version of sbcie 2848 avoids a disjointness condition on x and A by substituting twice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = A -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbcie 2848*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ps )
Theorem	sbciedf 2849*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbcied 2850*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbcied2 2851*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution, deduction form. (Contributed by NM, 13-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = B ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	elrabsf 2852	Membership in a restricted class abstraction, expressed with explicit class substitution. (The variation elrabf 2747 has implicit substitution). The hypothesis specifies that x must not be a free variable in B. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A e. { x e. B | ph } <-> ( A e. B /\ [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	eqsbc3 2853*	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. Set theory version of eqsb3 2182. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. x = B <-> A = B ) )
Theorem	sbcng 2854	Move negation in and out of class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. -. ph <-> -. [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbcimg 2855	Distribution of class substitution over implication. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph -> [. A / x ]. ps ) ) )
Theorem	sbcan 2856	Distribution of class substitution over conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph /\ [. A / x ]. ps ) )
Theorem	sbcang 2857	Distribution of class substitution over conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph /\ [. A / x ]. ps ) ) )
Theorem	sbcor 2858	Distribution of class substitution over disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph \/ [. A / x ]. ps ) )
Theorem	sbcorg 2859	Distribution of class substitution over disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph \/ [. A / x ]. ps ) ) )
Theorem	sbcbig 2860	Distribution of class substitution over biconditional. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ( ph <-> ps ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ps ) ) )
Theorem	sbcn1 2861	Move negation in and out of class substitution. One direction of sbcng 2854 that holds for proper classes. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. -. ph -> -. [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcim1 2862	Distribution of class substitution over implication. One direction of sbcimg 2855 that holds for proper classes. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ( ph -> ps ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph -> [. A / x ]. ps ) )
Theorem	sbcbi1 2863	Distribution of class substitution over biconditional. One direction of sbcbig 2860 that holds for proper classes. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ps ) )
Theorem	sbcbi2 2864	Substituting into equivalent wff's gives equivalent results. (Contributed by Giovanni Mascellani, 9-Apr-2018.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ps ) )
Theorem	sbcal 2865*	Move universal quantifier in and out of class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2016.)
|- ( [. A / y ]. A. x ph <-> A. x [. A / y ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcalg 2866*	Move universal quantifier in and out of class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / y ]. A. x ph <-> A. x [. A / y ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbcex2 2867*	Move existential quantifier in and out of class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2004.)
|- ( [. A / y ]. E. x ph <-> E. x [. A / y ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcexg 2868*	Move existential quantifier in and out of class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2004.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / y ]. E. x ph <-> E. x [. A / y ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbceqal 2869*	A variation of extensionality for classes. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> x = B ) -> A = B ) )
Theorem	sbeqalb 2870*	Theorem *14.121 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 185. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 28-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-May-2013.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( ( A. x ( ph <-> x = A ) /\ A. x ( ph <-> x = B ) ) -> A = B ) )
Theorem	sbcbid 2871	Formula-building deduction rule for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> [. A / x ]. ch ) )
Theorem	sbcbidv 2872*	Formula-building deduction rule for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps <-> [. A / x ]. ch ) )
Theorem	sbcbii 2873	Formula-building inference rule for class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> [. A / x ]. ps )
Theorem	eqsbc3r 2874*	eqsbc3 2853 with setvar variable on right side of equals sign. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Oct-2011.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. B = x <-> B = A ) )
Theorem	sbc3an 2875	Distribution of class substitution over triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2006.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( [. A / x ]. ph /\ [. A / x ]. ps /\ [. A / x ]. ch ) )
Theorem	sbcel1v 2876*	Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. x e. B <-> A e. B )
Theorem	sbcel2gv 2877*	Class substitution into a membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( [. B / x ]. A e. x <-> A e. B ) )
Theorem	sbcel21v 2878*	Class substitution into a membership relation. One direction of sbcel2gv 2877 that holds for proper classes. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. B / x ]. A e. x -> A e. B )
Theorem	sbcimdv 2879*	Substitution analogue of Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90 (alim 1386). (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 17-Aug-2018.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 7-Jul-2021.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. ps -> [. A / x ]. ch ) )
Theorem	sbctt 2880	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ F/ x ph ) -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	sbcgf 2881	Substitution for a variable not free in a wff does not affect it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	sbc19.21g 2882	Substitution for a variable not free in antecedent affects only the consequent. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( ph -> [. A / x ]. ps ) ) )
Theorem	sbcg 2883*	Substitution for a variable not occurring in a wff does not affect it. Distinct variable form of sbcgf 2881. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Nov-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	sbc2iegf 2884*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- F/ y ps   &    |- F/ x B e. W   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	sbc2ie 2885*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> ps )
Theorem	sbc2iedv 2886*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x = A /\ y = B ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbc3ie 2887*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit class substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Dec-2014.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- C e. _V   &    |- ( ( x = A /\ y = B /\ z = C ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. [. C / z ]. ph <-> ps )
Theorem	sbccomlem 2888*	Lemma for sbccom 2889. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. B / y ]. [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbccom 2889*	Commutative law for double class substitution. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Oct-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. [. B / y ]. ph <-> [. B / y ]. [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcralt 2890*	Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 22-Feb-2010.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ F/_ y A ) -> ( [. A / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbcrext 2891*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( F/_ y A -> ( [. A / x ]. E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbcralg 2892*	Interchange class substitution and restricted quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbcrex 2893*	Interchange class substitution and restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2005.) (Revised by NM, 18-Aug-2018.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	sbcreug 2894*	Interchange class substitution and restricted uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2013.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. E! y e. B ph <-> E! y e. B [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	sbcabel 2895*	Interchange class substitution and class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2005.)
|- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A e. V -> ( [. A / x ]. { y | ph } e. B <-> { y | [. A / x ]. ph } e. B ) )
Theorem	rspsbc 2896*	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. This provides an axiom for a predicate calculus for a restricted domain. This theorem generalizes the unrestricted stdpc4 1698 and spsbc 2826. See also rspsbca 2897 and rspcsbela . (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A e. B -> ( A. x e. B ph -> [. A / x ]. ph ) )
Theorem	rspsbca 2897*	Restricted quantifier version of Axiom 4 of [Mendelson] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2005.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ A. x e. B ph ) -> [. A / x ]. ph )
Theorem	rspesbca 2898*	Existence form of rspsbca 2897. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-2008.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 13-Oct-2016.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ [. A / x ]. ph ) -> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	spesbc 2899	Existence form of spsbc 2826. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- ( [. A / x ]. ph -> E. x ph )
Theorem	spesbcd 2900	form of spsbc 2826. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
|- ( ph -> [. A / x ]. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )