P. 50 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4901-5000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	iota1 4901	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	iotanul 4902	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	euiotaex 4903	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58, with existential uniqueness condition added. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V)
Theorem	iotass 4904*	Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	iota4 4905	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota4an 4906	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota5 4907*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iotabidv 4908*	Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	iotabii 4909	Formula-building deduction rule for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	iotacl 4910	Membership law for descriptions. This can useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 4887). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota2df 4911	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2d 4912*	A condition that allows us to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2 4913*	The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴))
Theorem	sniota 4914	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)})
Theorem	csbiotag 4915*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑))
2.6.8  Functions
Syntax	wfun 4916	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.)
wff Fun 𝐴
Syntax	wfn 4917	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.)
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵
Syntax	wf 4918	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.)
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵
Syntax	wf1 4919	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵
Syntax	wfo 4920	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵
Syntax	wf1o 4921	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵
Syntax	cfv 4922	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. (Read: The value of 𝐹 at 𝐴, or "𝐹 of 𝐴.")
class (𝐹‘𝐴)
Syntax	wiso 4923	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. (Read: 𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵.)
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-fun 4924	Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun I is true (funi 4952). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 3839 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3841). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 4925), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 4926), a one-to-one function (df-f1 4927), an onto function (df-fo 4928), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 4929). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 4932, dffun4 4933, dffun6 4936, dffun7 4948, dffun8 4949, and dffun9 4950. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I ))
Definition	df-fn 4925	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f 4926	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1 4927	Define a one-to-one function. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
Definition	df-fo 4928	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1o 4929	Define a one-to-one onto function. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Definition	df-fv 4930*	Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, ( I ‘∅) = ∅. Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 3841), but this is not required. For example, F = { ⟨ 2 , 6 ⟩, ⟨ 3 , 9 ⟩ } -> ( F ‘ 3 ) = 9 . We will later define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful. The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e. "𝐹 of 𝐴," but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-isom 4931*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵." Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dffun2 4932*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun4 4933*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun5r 4934*	A way of proving a relation is a function, analogous to mo2r 1993. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2020.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)) → Fun 𝐴)
Theorem	dffun6f 4935*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun6 4936*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	funmo 4937*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	dffun4f 4938*	Definition of function like dffun4 4933 but using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Mar-2019.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	funrel 4939	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	funss 4940	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴))
Theorem	funeq 4941	Equality theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	funeqi 4942	Equality inference for the function predicate. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵)
Theorem	funeqd 4943	Equality deduction for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Fun 𝐴 ↔ Fun 𝐵))
Theorem	nffun 4944	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2004.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥Fun 𝐹
Theorem	sbcfung 4945	Distribute proper substitution through the function predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ([𝐴 / 𝑥]Fun 𝐹 ↔ Fun ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹))
Theorem	funeu 4946*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴𝐹𝐵) → ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funeu2 4947*	There is exactly one value of a function. (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹)
Theorem	dffun7 4948*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. (Enderton's definition is ambiguous because "there is only one" could mean either "there is at most one" or "there is exactly one." However, dffun8 4949 shows that it doesn't matter which meaning we pick.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun8 4949*	Alternate definition of a function. One possibility for the definition of a function in [Enderton] p. 42. Compare dffun7 4948. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃!𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	dffun9 4950*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-2007.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∃*𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	funfn 4951	An equivalence for the function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 Fn dom 𝐴)
Theorem	funi 4952	The identity relation is a function. Part of Theorem 10.4 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Fun I
Theorem	nfunv 4953	The universe is not a function. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 27-Jan-2004.)
⊢ ¬ Fun V
Theorem	funopg 4954	A Kuratowski ordered pair is a function only if its components are equal. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ Fun ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	funopab 4955*	A class of ordered pairs is a function when there is at most one second member for each pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.)
⊢ (Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	funopabeq 4956*	A class of ordered pairs of values is a function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-1995.)
⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑦 = 𝐴}
Theorem	funopab4 4957*	A class of ordered pairs of values in the form used by df-mpt 3841 is a function. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2013.)
⊢ Fun {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴)}
Theorem	funmpt 4958	A function in maps-to notation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jan-2013.)
⊢ Fun (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	funmpt2 4959	Functionality of a class given by a "maps to" notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝐹
Theorem	funco 4960	The composition of two functions is a function. Exercise 29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) → Fun (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺))
Theorem	funres 4961	A restriction of a function is a function. Compare Exercise 18 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funssres 4962	The restriction of a function to the domain of a subclass equals the subclass. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹) → (𝐹 ↾ dom 𝐺) = 𝐺)
Theorem	fun2ssres 4963	Equality of restrictions of a function and a subclass. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐺) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐺 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funun 4964	The union of functions with disjoint domains is a function. Theorem 4.6 of [Monk1] p. 43. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (((Fun 𝐹 ∧ Fun 𝐺) ∧ (dom 𝐹 ∩ dom 𝐺) = ∅) → Fun (𝐹 ∪ 𝐺))
Theorem	funcnvsn 4965	The converse singleton of an ordered pair is a function. This is equivalent to funsn 4968 via cnvsn 4823, but stating it this way allows us to skip the sethood assumptions on 𝐴 and 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ Fun ◡{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	funsng 4966	A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	fnsng 4967	Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} Fn {𝐴})
Theorem	funsn 4968	A singleton of an ordered pair is a function. Theorem 10.5 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}
Theorem	funprg 4969	A set of two pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩})
Theorem	funtpg 4970	A set of three pairs is a function if their first members are different. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → Fun {⟨𝑋, 𝐴⟩, ⟨𝑌, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝑍, 𝐶⟩})
Theorem	funpr 4971	A function with a domain of two elements. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2010.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩})
Theorem	funtp 4972	A function with a domain of three elements. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → Fun {⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐹⟩})
Theorem	fnsn 4973	Functionality and domain of the singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} Fn {𝐴}
Theorem	fnprg 4974	Function with a domain of two different values. (Contributed by FL, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩} Fn {𝐴, 𝐵})
Theorem	fntpg 4975	Function with a domain of three different values. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Dec-2017.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐺 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 𝑍)) → {⟨𝑋, 𝐴⟩, ⟨𝑌, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝑍, 𝐶⟩} Fn {𝑋, 𝑌, 𝑍})
Theorem	fntp 4976	A function with a domain of three elements. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → {⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩, ⟨𝐵, 𝐸⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐹⟩} Fn {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶})
Theorem	fun0 4977	The empty set is a function. Theorem 10.3 of [Quine] p. 65. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1998.)
⊢ Fun ∅
Theorem	funcnvcnv 4978	The double converse of a function is a function. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Fun ◡◡𝐴)
Theorem	funcnv2 4979*	A simpler equivalence for single-rooted (see funcnv 4980). (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦∃*𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	funcnv 4980*	The converse of a class is a function iff the class is single-rooted, which means that for any 𝑦 in the range of 𝐴 there is at most one 𝑥 such that 𝑥𝐴𝑦. Definition of single-rooted in [Enderton] p. 43. See funcnv2 4979 for a simpler version. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴∃*𝑥 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	funcnv3 4981*	A condition showing a class is single-rooted. (See funcnv 4980). (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2006.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐴∃!𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	funcnveq 4982*	Another way of expressing that a class is single-rooted. Counterpart to dffun2 4932. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑧))
Theorem	fun2cnv 4983*	The double converse of a class is a function iff the class is single-valued. Each side is equivalent to Definition 6.4(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 23, who use the notation "Un(A)" for single-valued. Note that 𝐴 is not necessarily a function. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (Fun ◡◡𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦)
Theorem	svrelfun 4984	A single-valued relation is a function. (See fun2cnv 4983 for "single-valued.") Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡◡𝐴))
Theorem	fncnv 4985*	Single-rootedness (see funcnv 4980) of a class cut down by a cross product. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (◡(𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) Fn 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
Theorem	fun11 4986*	Two ways of stating that 𝐴 is one-to-one (but not necessarily a function). Each side is equivalent to Definition 6.4(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24, who use the notation "Un2 (A)" for one-to-one (but not necessarily a function). (Contributed by NM, 17-Jan-2006.)
⊢ ((Fun ◡◡𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧∀𝑤((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑧𝐴𝑤) → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑤)))
Theorem	fununi 4987*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of functions is a function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	funcnvuni 4988*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of single-rooted sets is single-rooted. (See funcnv 4980 for "single-rooted" definition.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 (Fun ◡𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → Fun ◡∪ 𝐴)
Theorem	fun11uni 4989*	The union of a chain (with respect to inclusion) of one-to-one functions is a one-to-one function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ((Fun 𝑓 ∧ Fun ◡𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ∨ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑓)) → (Fun ∪ 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡∪ 𝐴))
Theorem	funin 4990	The intersection with a function is a function. Exercise 14(a) of [Enderton] p. 53. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 17-Sep-2011.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun (𝐹 ∩ 𝐺))
Theorem	funres11 4991	The restriction of a one-to-one function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	funcnvres 4992	The converse of a restricted function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (◡𝐹 ↾ (𝐹 “ 𝐴)))
Theorem	cnvresid 4993	Converse of a restricted identity function. (Contributed by FL, 4-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ◡( I ↾ 𝐴) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	funcnvres2 4994	The converse of a restriction of the converse of a function equals the function restricted to the image of its converse. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2005.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ◡(◡𝐹 ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐹 ↾ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴)))
Theorem	funimacnv 4995	The image of the preimage of a function. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2004.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐹 “ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ∩ ran 𝐹))
Theorem	funimass1 4996	A kind of contraposition law that infers a subclass of an image from a preimage subclass. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2004.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹) → ((◡𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	funimass2 4997	A kind of contraposition law that infers an image subclass from a subclass of a preimage. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2004.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (◡𝐹 “ 𝐵)) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	imadiflem 4998	One direction of imadif 4999. This direction does not require Fun ◡𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))
Theorem	imadif 4999	The image of a difference is the difference of images. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.)
⊢ (Fun ◡𝐹 → (𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) = ((𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)))
Theorem	imainlem 5000	One direction of imain 5001. This direction does not require Fun ◡𝐹. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝐹 “ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐹 “ 𝐵))