![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 389 of 426) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-27775) |
![]() (27776-29300) |
![]() (29301-42551) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | dfvd2i 38801 | Inference form of dfvd2 38795. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | dfvd2ir 38802 | Right-to-left inference form of dfvd2 38795. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Syntax | wvd3 38803 | Syntax for a 3-hypothesis virtual deduction. (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc3 38804 | Syntax for a 3-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) | ||
Definition | df-vhc3 38805 | Definition of a 3-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) | ||
Definition | df-vd3 38806 | Definition of a 3-hypothesis virtual deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | dfvd3 38807 | Definition of a 3-hypothesis virtual deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))) | ||
Theorem | dfvd3i 38808 | Inference form of dfvd3 38807. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | dfvd3ir 38809 | Right-to-left inference form of dfvd3 38807. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Nov-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | dfvd3an 38810 | Definition of a 3-hypothesis virtual deduction in vd conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)) | ||
Theorem | dfvd3ani 38811 | Inference form of dfvd3an 38810. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) | ||
Theorem | dfvd3anir 38812 | Right-to-left inference form of dfvd3an 38810. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc4 38813 | Syntax for a 4-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc5 38814 | Syntax for a 5-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc6 38815 | Syntax for a 6-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc7 38816 | Syntax for a 7-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 , 𝜁 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc8 38817 | Syntax for an 8-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 , 𝜁 , 𝜎 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc9 38818 | Syntax for a 9-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 , 𝜁 , 𝜎 , 𝜌 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc10 38819 | Syntax for a 10-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 , 𝜁 , 𝜎 , 𝜌 , 𝜇 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc11 38820 | Syntax for an 11-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 , 𝜁 , 𝜎 , 𝜌 , 𝜇 , 𝜆 ) | ||
Syntax | wvhc12 38821 | Syntax for a 12-element virtual hypotheses collection. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
wff ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 , 𝜏 , 𝜂 , 𝜁 , 𝜎 , 𝜌 , 𝜇 , 𝜆 , 𝜅 ) | ||
Theorem | vd01 38822 | A virtual hypothesis virtually infers a theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜑 ) | ||
Theorem | vd02 38823 | Two virtual hypotheses virtually infer a theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜑 ) | ||
Theorem | vd03 38824 | A theorem is virtually inferred by the 3 virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜑 ) | ||
Theorem | vd12 38825 | A virtual deduction with 1 virtual hypothesis virtually inferring a virtual conclusion infers that the same conclusion is virtually inferred by the same virtual hypothesis and an additional hypothesis. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | vd13 38826 | A virtual deduction with 1 virtual hypothesis virtually inferring a virtual conclusion infers that the same conclusion is virtually inferred by the same virtual hypothesis and a two additional hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | vd23 38827 | A virtual deduction with 2 virtual hypotheses virtually inferring a virtual conclusion infers that the same conclusion is virtually inferred by the same 2 virtual hypotheses and a third hypothesis. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | dfvd2imp 38828 | The virtual deduction form of a 2-antecedent nested implication implies the 2-antecedent nested implication. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) | ||
Theorem | dfvd2impr 38829 | A 2-antecedent nested implication implies its virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) → ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 )) | ||
Theorem | in2 38830 | The virtual deduction introduction rule of converting the end virtual hypothesis of 2 virtual hypotheses into an antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) ) | ||
Theorem | int2 38831 | The virtual deduction introduction rule of converting the end virtual hypothesis of 2 virtual hypotheses into an antecedent. Conventional form of int2 38831 is ex 450. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ (𝜓 → 𝜒) ) | ||
Theorem | iin2 38832 | in2 38830 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 20-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | in2an 38833 | The virtual deduction introduction rule converting the second conjunct of the second virtual hypothesis into the antecedent of the conclusion. expd 452 is the non-virtual deduction form of in2an 38833. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 30-Jun-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜒 → 𝜃) ) | ||
Theorem | in3 38834 | The virtual deduction introduction rule of converting the end virtual hypothesis of 3 virtual hypotheses into an antecedent. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ (𝜒 → 𝜃) ) | ||
Theorem | iin3 38835 | in3 38834 without virtual deduction connectives. Special theorem needed for the Virtual Deduction translation tool. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | ||
Theorem | in3an 38836 | The virtual deduction introduction rule converting the second conjunct of the third virtual hypothesis into the antecedent of the conclusion. exp4a 633 is the non-virtual deduction form of in3an 38836. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jun-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) ▶ 𝜏 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ (𝜃 → 𝜏) ) | ||
Theorem | int3 38837 | The virtual deduction introduction rule of converting the end virtual hypothesis of 3 virtual hypotheses into an antecedent. Conventional form of int3 38837 is 3expia 1267. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ) ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ (𝜒 → 𝜃) ) | ||
Theorem | idn2 38838 | Virtual deduction identity rule which is idd 24 with virtual deduction symbols. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | iden2 38839 | Virtual deduction identity rule. simpr 477 in conjunction form Virtual Deduction notation. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 5-Sep-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ) ▶ 𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | idn3 38840 | Virtual deduction identity rule for three virtual hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | gen11 38841* | Virtual deduction generalizing rule for one quantifying variable and one virtual hypothesis. alrimiv 1855 is gen11 38841 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | gen11nv 38842 | Virtual deduction generalizing rule for one quantifying variable and one virtual hypothesis without distinct variables. alrimih 1751 is gen11nv 38842 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | gen12 38843* | Virtual deduction generalizing rule for two quantifying variables and one virtual hypothesis. gen12 38843 is alrimivv 1856 with virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜓 ) | ||
Theorem | gen21 38844* | Virtual deduction generalizing rule for one quantifying variables and two virtual hypothesis. gen21 38844 is alrimdv 1857 with virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | gen21nv 38845 | Virtual deduction form of alrimdh 1790. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 31-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | gen31 38846* | Virtual deduction generalizing rule for one quantifying variable and three virtual hypothesis. gen31 38846 is ggen31 38760 with virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jun-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ ∀𝑥𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | gen22 38847* | Virtual deduction generalizing rule for two quantifying variables and two virtual hypothesis. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | ggen22 38848* | gen22 38847 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦𝜒)) | ||
Theorem | exinst 38849 | Existential Instantiation. Virtual deduction form of exlimexi 38730. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜓 → ∀𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ ( ∃𝑥𝜑 , 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) ⇒ ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | exinst01 38850 | Existential Instantiation. Virtual Deduction rule corresponding to a special case of the Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus rule called Rule C in [Margaris] p. 79 and E ∃ in Table 1 on page 4 of the paper "Extracting information from intermediate T-systems" (2000) presented at IMLA99 by Mauro Ferrari, Camillo Fiorentini, and Pierangelo Miglioli. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ∃𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | exinst11 38851 | Existential Instantiation. Virtual Deduction rule corresponding to a special case of the Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus rule called Rule C in [Margaris] p. 79 and E ∃ in Table 1 on page 4 of the paper "Extracting information from intermediate T-systems" (2000) presented at IMLA99 by Mauro Ferrari, Camillo Fiorentini, and Pierangelo Miglioli. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ ∃𝑥𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑) & ⊢ (𝜒 → ∀𝑥𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | e1a 38852 | A Virtual deduction elimination rule. syl 17 is e1a 38852 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | el1 38853 | A Virtual deduction elimination rule. syl 17 is el1 38853 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | e1bi 38854 | Biconditional form of e1a 38852. sylib 208 is e1bi 38854 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | e1bir 38855 | Right biconditional form of e1a 38852. sylibr 224 is e1bir 38855 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) | ||
Theorem | e2 38856 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. syl6 35 is e2 38856 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | e2bi 38857 | Biconditional form of e2 38856. syl6ib 241 is e2bi 38857 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | e2bir 38858 | Right biconditional form of e2 38856. syl6ibr 242 is e2bir 38858 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜒) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) | ||
Theorem | ee223 38859 | e223 38860 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜁))) | ||
Theorem | e223 38860 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Dec-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜂 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 , 𝜏 ▶ 𝜁 ) | ||
Theorem | e222 38861 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | e220 38862 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee220 38863 | e220 38862 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e202 38864 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee202 38865 | e202 38864 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e022 38866 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee022 38867 | e022 38866 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e002 38868 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ( 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜒 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee002 38869 | e002 38868 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e020 38870 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee020 38871 | e020 38870 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e200 38872 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee200 38873 | e200 38872 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e221 38874 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee221 38875 | e221 38874 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e212 38876 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee212 38877 | e212 38876 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e122 38878 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | e112 38879 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee112 38880 | e112 38879 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e121 38881 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | e211 38882 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee211 38883 | e211 38882 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e210 38884 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee210 38885 | e210 38884 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e201 38886 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee201 38887 | e201 38886 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ 𝜃 & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e120 38888 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 10-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee120 38889 | Virtual deduction rule e120 38888 without virtual deduction symbols. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ 𝜏 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e021 38890 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜒 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee021 38891 | e021 38890 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e012 38892 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ ( 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜓 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee012 38893 | e012 38892 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e102 38894 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜃 ▶ 𝜂 ) | ||
Theorem | ee102 38895 | e102 38894 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) & ⊢ 𝜒 & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)) | ||
Theorem | e22 38896 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 2-May-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e22an 38897 | Conjunction form of e22 38896. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 , 𝜓 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | ee22an 38898 | e22an 38897 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜃)) & ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏)) | ||
Theorem | e111 38899 | A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl3c 66). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) | ||
Theorem | e1111 38900 | A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 6-Mar-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜓 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜒 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜃 ) & ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜏 ) & ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))) ⇒ ⊢ ( 𝜑 ▶ 𝜂 ) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |