P. 293 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 29201-29300   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	atcv0 29201	An atom covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	atssch 29202	Atoms are a subset of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms ⊆ Cℋ
Theorem	atelch 29203	An atom is a Hilbert lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	atne0 29204	An atom is not the Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)
Theorem	atss 29205	A lattice element smaller than an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)))
Theorem	atsseq 29206	Two atoms in a subset relationship are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcveq0 29207	A Hilbert lattice element covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	h1da 29208	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐴})) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	spansna 29209	The span of the singleton of a vector is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (span‘{𝐴}) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	sh1dle 29210	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any subspace containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ch1dle 29211	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any member of Cℋ containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	atom1d 29212*	The 1-dimensional subspaces of Hilbert space are its atoms. Part of Remark 10.3.5 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 = (span‘{𝑥})))
19.8.3  Superposition principle
Theorem	superpos 29213*	Superposition Principle. If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are distinct atoms, there exists a third atom, distinct from 𝐴 and 𝐵, that is the superposition of 𝐴 and 𝐵. Definition 3.4-3(a) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
19.8.4  Atoms, exchange and covering properties, atomicity
Theorem	chcv1 29214	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chcv2 29215	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chjatom 29216	The join of a closed subspace and an atom equals their subspace sum. Special case of remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65, stating that if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is finite-dimensional, then this equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shatomici 29217*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomici 29218*	The Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomic 29219*	A Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. Also Definition 3.4-2 in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	shatomistici 29220*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (span‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	hatomistici 29221*	Cℋ is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	chpssati 29222*	Two Hilbert lattice elements in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	chrelati 29223*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2i 29224*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvati 29225*	If a Hilbert lattice element covers another, it equals the other joined with some atom. This is a consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	cvbr4i 29226*	An alternate way to express the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexchlem 29227	Lemma for cvexchi 29228. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexchi 29228	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2 29229*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3 29230*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3i 29231*	A consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space: the ordering of Hilbert lattice elements is completely determined by the atoms they majorize. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat4i 29232*	A consequence of relative atomicity. Extensionality principle: two lattice elements are equal iff they majorize the same atoms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexch 29233	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvp 29234	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atnssm0 29235	The meet of a Hilbert lattice element and an incomparable atom is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	atnemeq0 29236	The meet of distinct atoms is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	atssma 29237	The meet with an atom's superset is the atom. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcv0eq 29238	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (0ℋ ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcv1 29239	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 = 0ℋ ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	atexch 29240	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the atom exchange property. Proposition 1(i) of [Kalmbach] p. 140. A version of this theorem related to vector analysis was originally proved by Hermann Grassmann in 1862. Also Definition 3.4-3(b) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8) (use atnemeq0 29236 to obtain atom inequality). (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atomli 29241	An assertion holding in atomic orthomodular lattices that is equivalent to the exchange axiom. Proposition 3.2.17 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) ∈ (HAtoms ∪ {0ℋ}))
Theorem	atoml2i 29242	An assertion holding in atomic orthomodular lattices that is equivalent to the exchange axiom. Proposition P8(ii) of [BeltramettiCassinelli1] p. 400. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	atordi 29243	An ordering law for a Hilbert lattice atom and a commuting subspace. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	atcvatlem 29244	Lemma for atcvati 29245. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvati 29245	A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvat2i 29246	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atord 29247	An ordering law for a Hilbert lattice atom and a commuting subspace. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	atcvat2 29248	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
19.8.5  Irreducibility
Theorem	chirredlem1 29249*	Lemma for chirredi 29253. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝑞 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑝 ∩ (⊥‘𝑟)) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	chirredlem2 29250*	Lemma for chirredi 29253. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → ((⊥‘𝑟) ∩ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞)) = 𝑞)
Theorem	chirredlem3 29251*	Lemma for chirredi 29253. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑟 = 𝑝))
Theorem	chirredlem4 29252*	Lemma for chirredi 29253. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑟 = 𝑝 ∨ 𝑟 = 𝑞))
Theorem	chirredi 29253*	The Hilbert lattice is irreducible: any element that commutes with all elements must be zero or one. Theorem 14.8.4 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 166. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 0ℋ ∨ 𝐴 = ℋ)
Theorem	chirred 29254*	The Hilbert lattice is irreducible: any element that commutes with all elements must be zero or one. Theorem 14.8.4 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 166. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥) → (𝐴 = 0ℋ ∨ 𝐴 = ℋ))
19.8.6  Atoms (cont.)
Theorem	atcvat3i 29255	A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → (((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvat4i 29256*	A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑥))))
Theorem	atdmd 29257	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(c) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd 29258	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(b) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd2 29259	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. Part of Exercise 6 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atabsi 29260	Absorption of an incomparable atom. Similar to Exercise 7.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atabs2i 29261	Absorption of an incomparable atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴))
19.8.7  Modular symmetry
Theorem	mdsymlem1 29262*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem2 29263*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem3 29264*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdsymlem4 29265*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. This is the forward direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem5 29266*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝑞 = 𝑝 → ((𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (((𝑐 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑐) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑐 → 𝑝 ⊆ ((𝑐 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴))))))
Theorem	mdsymlem6 29267*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. This is the converse direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168, and is based on the proof of Theorem 1(d) to (e) of [Maeda] p. 167. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem7 29268*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. Note that Maeda's 1965 definition of dual modular pair has reversed arguments compared to the later (1970) definition given in Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130, which is the one that we use. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))))
Theorem	mdsymlem8 29269*	Lemma for mdsymi 29270. Lemma 4(ii) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵))
Theorem	mdsymi 29270	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsym 29271	M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. Lemma 5 of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsym 29272	Dual M-symmetry of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴))
Theorem	atdmd2 29273	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdii 29274	If the subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed, then the elements are a dual modular pair. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 139. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	cmmdi 29275	Commuting subspaces form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmdmdi 29276	Commuting subspaces form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	sumdmdlem 29277	Lemma for sumdmdi 29279. The span of vector 𝐶 not in the subspace sum is "trimmed off." (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)) → ((𝐵 +ℋ (span‘{𝐶})) ∩ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	sumdmdlem2 29278*	Lemma for sumdmdi 29279. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	sumdmdi 29279	The subspace sum of two Hilbert lattice elements is closed iff the elements are a dual modular pair. Theorem 2 of [Holland] p. 1519. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	dmdbr4ati 29280*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	dmdbr5ati 29281*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	dmdbr6ati 29282*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. The modular law takes the form of the shearing identity. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) = ((((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥))
Theorem	dmdbr7ati 29283*	Dual modular pair property in terms of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝑥) ⊆ (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	mdoc1i 29284	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	mdoc2i 29285	Orthocomplements form a modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	dmdoc1i 29286	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* (⊥‘𝐴)
Theorem	dmdoc2i 29287	Orthocomplements form a dual modular pair. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴
Theorem	mdcompli 29288	A condition equivalent to the modular pair property. Part of proof of Theorem 1.14 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 4. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	dmdcompli 29289	A condition equivalent to the dual modular pair property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐵 ∩ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mddmdin0i 29290*	If dual modular implies modular whenever meet is zero, then dual modular implies modular for arbitrary lattice elements. This theorem is needed for the remark after Lemma 7 of [Holland] p. 1524 to hold. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ((𝑥 𝑀ℋ* 𝑦 ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = 0ℋ) → 𝑥 𝑀ℋ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdjreui 29291*	A member of the sum of disjoint subspaces has a unique decomposition. Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦))
Theorem	cdj1i 29292*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) => (2) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑤 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑣)) ≤ (𝑤 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑣)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) = 1 → 𝑥 ≤ (normℎ‘(𝑦 −ℎ 𝑧)))))
Theorem	cdj3lem1 29293*	A property of "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." Part of Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑦) + (normℎ‘𝑧)) ≤ (𝑥 · (normℎ‘(𝑦 +ℎ 𝑧)))) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	cdj3lem2 29294*	Lemma for cdj3i 29300. Value of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	cdj3lem2a 29295*	Lemma for cdj3i 29300. Closure of the first-component function 𝑆. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑆‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	cdj3lem2b 29296*	Lemma for cdj3i 29300. The first-component function 𝑆 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3lem3 29297*	Lemma for cdj3i 29300. Value of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 23-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘(𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷)) = 𝐷)
Theorem	cdj3lem3a 29298*	Lemma for cdj3i 29300. Closure of the second-component function 𝑇. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → (𝑇‘𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	cdj3lem3b 29299*	Lemma for cdj3i 29300. The second-component function 𝑇 is bounded if the subspaces are completely disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) → ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))
Theorem	cdj3i 29300*	Two ways to express "𝐴 and 𝐵 are completely disjoint subspaces." (1) <=> (3) in Lemma 5 of [Holland] p. 1520. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ↦ (℩𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑆‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵)(normℎ‘(𝑇‘𝑢)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘𝑢))))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑣 ∈ ℝ (0 < 𝑣 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((normℎ‘𝑥) + (normℎ‘𝑦)) ≤ (𝑣 · (normℎ‘(𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ∧ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))