P. 390 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 38901-39000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	e110 38901	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee110 38902	e110 38901 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 22-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
Theorem	e101 38903	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee101 38904	e101 38903 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
Theorem	e011 38905	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee011 38906	e011 38905 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏)
Theorem	e100 38907	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee100 38908	e100 38907 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)
Theorem	e010 38909	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee010 38910	e010 38909 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏)
Theorem	e001 38911	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee001 38912	e001 38911 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)
Theorem	e11 38913	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	e11an 38914	Conjunction form of e11 38913. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	ee11an 38915	e11an 38914 without virtual deductions. syl22anc 1327 is also e11an 38914 without virtual deductions, exept with a different order of hypotheses. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	e01 38916	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	e01an 38917	Conjunction form of e01 38916. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	ee01an 38918	e01an 38917 without virtual deductions. sylancr 695 is also a form of e01an 38917 without virtual deduction, except the order of the hypotheses is different. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)
Theorem	e10 38919	A virtual deduction elimination rule (see mpisyl 21). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	e10an 38920	Conjunction form of e10 38919. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	ee10an 38921	e10an 38920 without virtual deductions. sylancl 694 is also e10an 38920 without virtual deductions, except the order of the hypotheses is different. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)
Theorem	e02 38922	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e02an 38923	Conjunction form of e02 38922. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee02an 38924	e02an 38923 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏))
Theorem	eel021old 38925	el021old 38926 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
Theorem	el021old 38926	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   )   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   )   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	eel132 38927	syl2an 494 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 26-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂)
Theorem	eel000cT 38928	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜃)
Theorem	eel0TT 38929	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃
Theorem	eelT00 38930	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃
Theorem	eelTTT 38931	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃
Theorem	eelT11 38932	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏)
Theorem	eelT1 38933	Syllogism inference combined with modus ponens. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Alan Sare, 23-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)
Theorem	eelT12 38934	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂)
Theorem	eelTT1 38935	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)
Theorem	eelT01 38936	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)
Theorem	eel0T1 38937	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜏)
Theorem	eel12131 38938	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜁)
Theorem	eel2131 38939	syl2an 494 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 26-Aug-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂)
Theorem	eel3132 38940	syl2an 494 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂)
Theorem	eel0321old 38941	el0321old 38942 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜂)
Theorem	el0321old 38942	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   )   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   )   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	eel2122old 38943	el2122old 38944 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜂)
Theorem	el2122old 38944	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   )   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   )   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	eel0001 38945	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜂)
Theorem	eel0000 38946	Elimination rule similar to mp4an 709, except with a left-nested conjunction unification theorem. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜏
Theorem	eel1111 38947	Four-hypothesis elimination deduction for an assertion with a singleton virtual hypothesis collection. Similar to syl112anc 1330 except the unification theorem uses left-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)
Theorem	eel00001 38948	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜂)    &   ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜏 → 𝜁)
Theorem	eel00000 38949	Elimination rule similar eel0000 38946, except with five hpothesis steps. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜂
Theorem	eel11111 38950	Five-hypothesis elimination deduction for an assertion with a singleton virtual hypothesis collection. Similar to syl113anc 1338 except the unification theorem uses left-nested conjunction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂)    &   ⊢ (((((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜁)
Theorem	e12 38951	A virtual deduction elimination rule (see sylsyld 61). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e12an 38952	Conjunction form of e12 38951 (see syl6an 568). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	el12 38953	Virtual deduction form of syl2an 494. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 23-Apr-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜏   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜏   )   ▶   𝜃   )
Theorem	e20 38954	A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6mpi 67). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e20an 38955	Conjunction form of e20 38954. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee20an 38956	e20an 38955 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝜃    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))
Theorem	e21 38957	A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl6ci 71). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e21an 38958	Conjunction form of e21 38957. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	ee21an 38959	e21an 38958 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))
Theorem	e333 38960	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e33 38961	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	e33an 38962	Conjunction form of e33 38961. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee33an 38963	e33an 38962 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e3 38964	Meta-connective form of syl8 76. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e3bi 38965	Biconditional form of e3 38964. syl8ib 246 is e3bi 38965 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e3bir 38966	Right biconditional form of e3 38964. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜏   )
Theorem	e03 38967	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee03 38968	e03 38967 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e03an 38969	Conjunction form of e03 38967. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee03an 38970	Conjunction form of ee03 38968. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e30 38971	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee30 38972	e30 38971 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e30an 38973	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee30an 38974	Conjunction form of ee30 38972. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ 𝜏    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e13 38975	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	e13an 38976	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee13an 38977	e13an 38976 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 8-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e31 38978	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee31 38979	e31 38978 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e31an 38980	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee31an 38981	e31an 38980 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜏)    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e23 38982	A virtual deduction elimination rule (see syl10 79). (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	e23an 38983	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee23an 38984	e23an 38983 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e32 38985	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee32 38986	e32 38985 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 18-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e32an 38987	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 24-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )
Theorem	ee32an 38988	e33an 38962 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜏))    &   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜂)))
Theorem	e123 38989	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜏   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜏   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	ee123 38990	e123 38989 without virtual deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 25-Jul-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜃 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → (𝜏 → 𝜁)))
Theorem	el123 38991	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜏   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃 ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜁)    ⇒   ⊢ (   (   𝜑   ,   𝜒   ,   𝜏   )   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e233 38992	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 29-Feb-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜒   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜃   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e323 38993	A virtual deduction elimination rule. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 17-Apr-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜃   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ▶   𝜏   )    &   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜂   )    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → (𝜂 → 𝜁)))    ⇒   ⊢ (   𝜑   ,   𝜓   ,   𝜒   ▶   𝜁   )
Theorem	e000 38994	A virtual deduction elimination rule. The non-virtual deduction form of e000 38994 is the virtual deduction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜃
Theorem	e00 38995	Elimination rule identical to mp2 9. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2 9. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	e00an 38996	Elimination rule identical to mp2an 708. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is mp2an 708. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 15-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	eel00cT 38997	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ 𝜓    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜒)
Theorem	eelTT 38998	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 4-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (⊤ → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜒
Theorem	e0a 38999	Elimination rule identical to ax-mp 5. The non-virtual deduction form is the virtual deduction form, which is ax-mp 5. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 14-Jun-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	eelT 39000	An elimination deduction. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 5-Feb-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⊤ → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓