P. 268 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 26701-26800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	usgrn2cycl 26701	In a simple graph there are no cycles with length 2 (consisting of two edges). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 4-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (#‘𝐹) ≠ 2)
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem1 26702	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 13-Mar-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 − 𝐵) + 1) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem2 26703*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (0...(𝑁 − 𝑆))) → (𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑃‘(𝐽 + 𝑆)))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem3 26704*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (((𝑁 − 𝑆) + 1)...𝑁)) → (𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑃‘((𝐽 + 𝑆) − 𝑁)))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem4 26705*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^(𝑁 − 𝑆))if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem5 26706*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (((𝑁 − 𝑆) + 1)..^𝑁)if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem6 26707*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐽 = (𝑁 − 𝑆)) → if-((𝑄‘𝐽) = (𝑄‘(𝐽 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝐽)) = {(𝑄‘𝐽)}, {(𝑄‘𝐽), (𝑄‘(𝐽 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝐽))))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0lem7 26708*	Lemma for crctcshwlkn0 26713. (Contributed by AV, 12-Mar-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (1..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Word 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑃‘𝑖) = (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖)}, {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃‘𝑁) = (𝑃‘0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑗 ∈ (0..^𝑁)if-((𝑄‘𝑗) = (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗)) = {(𝑄‘𝑗)}, {(𝑄‘𝑗), (𝑄‘(𝑗 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐻‘𝑗))))
Theorem	crctcshlem1 26709	Lemma for crctcsh 26716. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)
Theorem	crctcshlem2 26710	Lemma for crctcsh 26716. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (#‘𝐻) = 𝑁)
Theorem	crctcshlem3 26711*	Lemma for crctcsh 26716. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐻 ∈ V ∧ 𝑄 ∈ V))
Theorem	crctcshlem4 26712*	Lemma for crctcsh 26716. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 = 0) → (𝐻 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑄 = 𝑃))
Theorem	crctcshwlkn0 26713*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a walk ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 0) → 𝐻(Walks‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcshwlk 26714*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a walk ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Walks‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcshtrl 26715*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a trail ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 14-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Trails‘𝐺)𝑄)
Theorem	crctcsh 26716*	Cyclically shifting the indices of a circuit ⟨𝐹, 𝑃⟩ results in a circuit ⟨𝐻, 𝑄⟩. (Contributed by AV, 10-Mar-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (#‘𝐹)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ (0..^𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐹 cyclShift 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑥 ∈ (0...𝑁) ↦ if(𝑥 ≤ (𝑁 − 𝑆), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 𝑆)), (𝑃‘((𝑥 + 𝑆) − 𝑁))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑄)
16.3.7  Walks as words In general, a walk is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, as defined in df-wlks 26495: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). Often, it is sufficient to refer to a walk by the natural sequence of its vertices, i.e omitting its edges in its representation: p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) p(n), see the corresponding remark in [Diestel] p. 6. The concept of a Word, see df-word 13299, is the appropriate way to define such a sequence (being finite and starting at index 0) of vertices. Therefore, it is used in definitions df-wwlks 26722 and df-wwlksn 26723, and the representation of a walk as sequence of its vertices is called "walk as word". Only for simple pseudographs, however, the edges can be uniquely reconstructed from such a representation. In other cases, there could be more than one edge between two adjacent vertices in the walk (in a multigraph), or two adjacent vertices could be connected by two different hyperedges involving additional vertices (in a hypergraph).
Syntax	cwwlks 26717	Extend class notation with walks (in a graph) as word over the set of vertices.
class WWalks
Syntax	cwwlksn 26718	Extend class notation with walks (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WWalksN
Syntax	cwwlksnon 26719	Extend class notation with walks between two vertices (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WWalksNOn
Syntax	cwwspthsn 26720	Extend class notation with simple paths (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WSPathsN
Syntax	cwwspthsnon 26721	Extend class notation with simple paths between two vertices (in a graph) of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices.
class WSPathsNOn
Definition	df-wwlks 26722*	Define the set of all walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. Such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n-1) p(n) of the vertices in a walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n) as defined in df-wlks 26495. 𝑤 = ∅ has to be excluded because a walk always consists of at least one vertex, see wlkn0 26516. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ WWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝑔) ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ (Edg‘𝑔))})
Definition	df-wwlksn 26723*	Define the set of all walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length n as words over the set of vertices. Such a word corresponds to the sequence p(0) p(1) ... p(n) of the vertices in a walk p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n) as defined in df-wlks 26495. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ WWalksN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝑔) ∣ (#‘𝑤) = (𝑛 + 1)})
Definition	df-wwlksnon 26724*	Define the collection of walks of a fixed length with particular endpoints as word over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ WWalksNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑛) = 𝑏)}))
Definition	df-wspthsn 26725*	Define the collection of simple paths of a fixed length as word over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ WSPathsN = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑛 WWalksN 𝑔) ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓(SPaths‘𝑔)𝑤})
Definition	df-wspthsnon 26726*	Define the collection of simple paths of a fixed length with particular endpoints as word over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ WSPathsNOn = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑎(𝑛 WWalksNOn 𝑔)𝑏) ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓(𝑎(SPathsOn‘𝑔)𝑏)𝑤}))
Theorem	wwlks 26727*	The set of walks (in an undirected graph) as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (WWalks‘𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ (𝑤 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑤) − 1)){(𝑤‘𝑖), (𝑤‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸)}
Theorem	iswwlks 26728*	A word over the set of vertices representing a walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ↔ (𝑊 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	wwlksn 26729*	The set of walks (in an undirected graph) of a fixed length as words over the set of vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 1)})
Theorem	iswwlksn 26730	A word over the set of vertices representing a walk of a fixed length (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 8-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∧ (#‘𝑊) = (𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	iswwlksnx 26731*	Properties of a word to represent a walk of a fixed length, definition of WWalks expanded. (Contributed by AV, 28-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑊) − 1)){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ (#‘𝑊) = (𝑁 + 1))))
Theorem	wwlkbp 26732	Basic properties of a walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉))
Theorem	wwlknbp 26733	Basic properties of a walk of a fixed length (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 16-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 20-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉))
Theorem	wwlknp 26734*	Properties of a set being a walk of length n (represented by a word). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → (𝑊 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ (#‘𝑊) = (𝑁 + 1) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^𝑁){(𝑊‘𝑖), (𝑊‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	wspthsn 26735*	The set of simple paths of a fixed length as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 WSPathsN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑤}
Theorem	iswspthn 26736*	An element of the set of simple paths of a fixed length as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WSPathsN 𝐺) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑊))
Theorem	wspthnp 26737*	Properties of a set being a simple path of a fixed length as word. (Contributed by AV, 18-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WSPathsN 𝐺) → ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑊))
Theorem	wwlksnon 26738*	The set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝑎 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝑏)}))
Theorem	wspthsnon 26739*	The set of simple paths of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺) = (𝑎 ∈ 𝑉, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ {𝑤 ∈ (𝑎(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝑏) ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓(𝑎(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝑏)𝑤}))
Theorem	iswwlksnon 26740*	The set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑤‘𝑁) = 𝐵)})
Theorem	iswspthsnon 26741*	The set of simple paths of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) = {𝑤 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑤})
Theorem	wwlknon 26742	An element of the set of walks of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Feb-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∧ (𝑊‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑊‘𝑁) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	wspthnon 26743*	An element of the set of simple paths of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ↔ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑊)))
Theorem	wspthnonp 26744*	Properties of a set being a simple path of a fixed length between two vertices as word. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) → ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑊 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WWalksNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑓 𝑓(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑊)))
Theorem	wspthneq1eq2 26745	Two simple paths with identical sequences of vertices start and end at the same vertices. (Contributed by AV, 14-May-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (𝐴(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝐶(𝑁 WSPathsNOn 𝐺)𝐷)) → (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	wwlksn0s 26746*	The set of all walks as words of length 0 is the set of all words of length 1 over the vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (0 WWalksN 𝐺) = {𝑤 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘𝑤) = 1}
Theorem	wwlkssswrd 26747	Walks (represented by words) are words. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (WWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ Word 𝑉
Theorem	wwlksn0 26748*	A walk of length 0 is represented by a singleton word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 21-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (0 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 𝑊 = ⟨“𝑣”⟩)
Theorem	0enwwlksnge1 26749	In graphs without edges, there are no walks of length greater than 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 7-May-2021.)
⊢ (((Edg‘𝐺) = ∅ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = ∅)
Theorem	wwlkswwlksn 26750	A walk of a fixed length as word is a walk (in an undirected graph) as word. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	wwlkssswwlksn 26751	The walks of a fixed length as words are walks (in an undirected graph) as words. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ⊆ (WWalks‘𝐺)
Theorem	wwlknbp2 26752	Other basic properties of a set being a walk of length n (represented by a word). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → (𝑊 ∈ Word (Vtx‘𝐺) ∧ (#‘𝑊) = (𝑁 + 1)))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks1 26753	The sequence of vertices in a walk is a walk as word in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺)))
Theorem	wlklnwwlkln1 26754	The sequence of vertices in a walk of length 𝑁 is a walk as word of length 𝑁 in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 𝑁) → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2lem1 26755*	Lemma 1 for wlkiswwlks2 26761. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) → (#‘𝐹) = ((#‘𝑃) − 1))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2lem2 26756*	Lemma 2 for wlkiswwlks2 26761. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}))    ⇒   ⊢ (((#‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1))) → (𝐹‘𝐼) = (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝐼), (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1))}))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2lem3 26757*	Lemma 3 for wlkiswwlks2 26761. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) → 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉)
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2lem4 26758*	Lemma 4 for wlkiswwlks2 26761. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2lem5 26759*	Lemma 5 for wlkiswwlks2 26761. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2lem6 26760*	Lemma 6 for wlkiswwlks2 26761. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)) ↦ (◡𝐸‘{(𝑃‘𝑥), (𝑃‘(𝑥 + 1))}))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 1 ≤ (#‘𝑃)) → (∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^((#‘𝑃) − 1)){(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))} ∈ ran 𝐸 → (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐸 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐸‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))})))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks2 26761*	A walk as word corresponds to the sequence of vertices in a walk in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) → ∃𝑓 𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	wlkiswwlks 26762*	A walk as word corresponds to a walk in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (∃𝑓 𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺)))
Theorem	wlkiswwlksupgr2 26763*	A walk as word corresponds to the sequence of vertices in a walk in a pseudograph. This variant of wlkiswwlks2 26761 does not require 𝐺 to be a simple pseudograph, but it requires the Axiom of Choice (ac6 9302) for its proof. Notice that only the existence of a function 𝑓 can be proven, but, in general, it cannot be "constructed" (as in wlkiswwlks2 26761). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) → ∃𝑓 𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	wlkiswwlkupgr 26764*	A walk as word corresponds to a walk in a pseudograph. This variant of wlkiswwlks 26762 does not require 𝐺 to be a simple pseudograph, but it requires (indirectly) the Axiom of Choice for its proof. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 10-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (∃𝑓 𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺)))
Theorem	wlkpwwlkf1ouspgr 26765*	The mapping of (ordinary) walks to their sequences of vertices is a bijection in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ↦ (2nd ‘𝑤))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → 𝐹:(Walks‘𝐺)–1-1-onto→(WWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	wlkisowwlkupgr 26766*	The set of walks as words and the set of (ordinary) walks are isomorphic in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by AV, 6-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → ∃𝑓 𝑓:(Walks‘𝐺)–1-1-onto→(WWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	wwlksm1edg 26767	Removing the trailing edge from a walk (as word) with at least one edge results in a walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 2 ≤ (#‘𝑊)) → (𝑊 substr ⟨0, ((#‘𝑊) − 1)⟩) ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺))
Theorem	wlklnwwlkln2lem 26768*	Lemma for wlklnwwlkln2 26769 and wlklnwwlklnupgr2 26771. Formerly part of proof for wlklnwwlkln2 26769. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) → ∃𝑓 𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝑓) = 𝑁)))
Theorem	wlklnwwlkln2 26769*	A walk of length 𝑁 as word corresponds to the sequence of vertices in a walk of length 𝑁 in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝑓) = 𝑁)))
Theorem	wlklnwwlkn 26770*	A walk of length 𝑁 as word corresponds to a walk with length 𝑁 in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USPGraph → (∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝑓) = 𝑁) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wlklnwwlklnupgr2 26771*	A walk of length 𝑁 as word corresponds to the sequence of vertices in a walk of length 𝑁 in a pseudograph. This variant of wlklnwwlkln2 26769 does not require 𝐺 to be a simple pseudograph, but it requires (indirectly) the Axiom of Choice. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝑃 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝑓) = 𝑁)))
Theorem	wlklnwwlknupgr 26772*	A walk of length 𝑁 as word corresponds to a walk with length 𝑁 in a pseudograph. This variant of wlkiswwlks 40197 does not require 𝐺 to be a simple pseudograph, but it requires (indirectly) the Axiom of Choice for its proof. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 12-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (∃𝑓(𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝑓) = 𝑁) ↔ 𝑃 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wlknewwlksn 26773	If a walk in a pseudograph has length 𝑁, then the sequence of the vertices of the walk is a word representing the walk as word of length 𝑁. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (#‘(1st ‘𝑊)) = 𝑁)) → (2nd ‘𝑊) ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	wlknwwlksnfun 26774*	Lemma 1 for wlknwwlksnbij2 26778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇⟶𝑊)
Theorem	wlknwwlksninj 26775*	Lemma 2 for wlknwwlksnbij2 26778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇–1-1→𝑊)
Theorem	wlknwwlksnsur 26776*	Lemma 3 for wlknwwlksnbij2 26778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇–onto→𝑊)
Theorem	wlknwwlksnbij 26777*	Lemma 4 for wlknwwlksnbij2 26778. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 14-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇–1-1-onto→𝑊)
Theorem	wlknwwlksnbij2 26778*	There is a bijection between the set of walks of a fixed length and the set of walks represented by words of the same length in a simple pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 15-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁}–1-1-onto→(𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	wlknwwlksnen 26779*	In a simple pseudograph, the set of walks of a fixed length and the set of walks represented by words are equinumerous. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 15-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁} ≈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	wlknwwlksneqs 26780*	The set of walks of a fixed length and the set of walks represented by words have the same size. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 15-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (#‘{𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ (#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁}) = (#‘(𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wlkwwlkfun 26781*	Lemma 1 for wlkwwlkbij2 26785. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 15-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑝)‘0) = 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇⟶𝑊)
Theorem	wlkwwlkinj 26782*	Lemma 2 for wlkwwlkbij2 26785. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2018.) (Proof shortened by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑝)‘0) = 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇–1-1→𝑊)
Theorem	wlkwwlksur 26783*	Lemma 3 for wlkwwlkbij2 26785. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑝)‘0) = 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇–onto→𝑊)
Theorem	wlkwwlkbij 26784*	Lemma 4 for wlkwwlkbij2 26785. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑝)‘0) = 𝑃)}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = {𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝑇 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → 𝐹:𝑇–1-1-onto→𝑊)
Theorem	wlkwwlkbij2 26785*	There is a bijection between the set of walks of a fixed length, starting at a fixed vertex, and the set of walks represented as words of the same length, starting at the same vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑝 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺) ∣ ((#‘(1st ‘𝑝)) = 𝑁 ∧ ((2nd ‘𝑝)‘0) = 𝑃)}–1-1-onto→{𝑤 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ (𝑤‘0) = 𝑃})
Theorem	wwlkseq 26786*	Equality of two walks (as words). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺) ∧ 𝑇 ∈ (WWalks‘𝐺)) → (𝑊 = 𝑇 ↔ ((#‘𝑊) = (#‘𝑇) ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝑊))(𝑊‘𝑖) = (𝑇‘𝑖))))
Theorem	wwlksnred 26787	Reduction of a walk (as word) by removing the trailing edge/vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑊 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺) → (𝑊 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wwlksnext 26788	Extension of a walk (as word) by adding an edge/vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑇), 𝑆} ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑇 ++ ⟨“𝑆”⟩) ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺))
Theorem	wwlksnextbi 26789	Extension of a walk (as word) by adding an edge/vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 = (𝑇 ++ ⟨“𝑆”⟩) ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑇), 𝑆} ∈ 𝐸)) → (𝑊 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺) ↔ 𝑇 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)))
Theorem	wwlksnredwwlkn 26790*	For each walk (as word) of length at least 1 there is a shorter walk (as word). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (𝑊 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)((𝑊 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑦 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑦), ( lastS ‘𝑊)} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	wwlksnredwwlkn0 26791*	For each walk (as word) of length at least 1 there is a shorter walk (as word) starting at the same vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺)) → ((𝑊‘0) = 𝑃 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺)((𝑊 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦‘0) = 𝑃 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑦), ( lastS ‘𝑊)} ∈ 𝐸)))
Theorem	wwlksnextwrd 26792*	Lemma for wwlksnextbij 26797. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((#‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 2) ∧ (𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)})
Theorem	wwlksnextfun 26793*	Lemma for wwlksnextbij 26797. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((#‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 2) ∧ (𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {( lastS ‘𝑊), 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ( lastS ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → 𝐹:𝐷⟶𝑅)
Theorem	wwlksnextinj 26794*	Lemma for wwlksnextbij 26797. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((#‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 2) ∧ (𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {( lastS ‘𝑊), 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ( lastS ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → 𝐹:𝐷–1-1→𝑅)
Theorem	wwlksnextsur 26795*	Lemma for wwlksnextbij 26797. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((#‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 2) ∧ (𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {( lastS ‘𝑊), 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ( lastS ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → 𝐹:𝐷–onto→𝑅)
Theorem	wwlksnextbij0 26796*	Lemma for wwlksnextbij 26797. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = {𝑤 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((#‘𝑤) = (𝑁 + 2) ∧ (𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {( lastS ‘𝑊), 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑡 ∈ 𝐷 ↦ ( lastS ‘𝑡))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → 𝐹:𝐷–1-1-onto→𝑅)
Theorem	wwlksnextbij 26797*	There is a bijection between the extensions of a walk (as word) by an edge and the set of vertices being connected to the trailing vertex of the walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → ∃𝑓 𝑓:{𝑤 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}–1-1-onto→{𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {( lastS ‘𝑊), 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸})
Theorem	wwlksnexthasheq 26798*	The number of the extensions of a walk (as word) by an edge equals the number of vertices being connected to the trailing vertex of the walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Apr-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 5-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) → (#‘{𝑤 ∈ ((𝑁 + 1) WWalksN 𝐺) ∣ ((𝑤 substr ⟨0, (𝑁 + 1)⟩) = 𝑊 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑊), ( lastS ‘𝑤)} ∈ 𝐸)}) = (#‘{𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ {( lastS ‘𝑊), 𝑛} ∈ 𝐸}))
Theorem	disjxwwlksn 26799*	Sets of walks (as words) extended by an edge are disjunct if each set contains extensions of distinct walks. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Apr-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ Disj 𝑦 ∈ (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺){𝑥 ∈ Word 𝑉 ∣ ((𝑥 substr ⟨0, 𝑁⟩) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦‘0) = 𝑃 ∧ {( lastS ‘𝑦), ( lastS ‘𝑥)} ∈ 𝐸)}
Theorem	wwlksnndef 26800	Conditions for WWalksN not being defined. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Jul-2018.) (Revised by AV, 19-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∉ V ∨ 𝑁 ∉ ℕ0) → (𝑁 WWalksN 𝐺) = ∅)