P. 267 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 26601-26700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	wksonproplem 26601*	Lemma for theorems for properties of walks between two vertices, e.g. trlsonprop 26604. (Contributed by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V)) → (𝐹(𝐴(𝑊‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(𝑂‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(𝑄‘𝐺)𝑃)))    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝑎(𝑂‘𝑔)𝑏)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(𝑄‘𝑔)𝑝)}))    &   ⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝑓(𝑄‘𝐺)𝑝) → 𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(𝑊‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(𝑂‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(𝑄‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	trlsonfval 26602*	The set of trails between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 15-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	istrlson 26603	Properties of a pair of functions to be a trail between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	trlsonprop 26604	Properties of a trail between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	trlsonistrl 26605	A trail between two vertices is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	trlsonwlkon 26606	A trail between two vertices is a walk between these vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 7-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	trlontrl 26607	A trail is a trail between its endpoints. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(TrailsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))𝑃)
16.3.4  Paths and simple paths
Syntax	cpths 26608	Extend class notation with paths (of a graph).
class Paths
Syntax	cspths 26609	Extend class notation with simple paths (of a graph).
class SPaths
Syntax	cpthson 26610	Extend class notation with paths between two vertices (within a graph).
class PathsOn
Syntax	cspthson 26611	Extend class notation with simple paths between two vertices (within a graph).
class SPathsOn
Definition	df-pths 26612*	Define the set of all paths (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Path (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A path is a trail in which all vertices (except possibly the first and last) are distinct. ... use the term simple path to refer to a path which contains no repeated vertices." According to Bollobas: "... a path is a walk with distinct vertices.", see Notation of [Bollobas] p. 5. (A walk with distinct vertices is actually a simple path, see upgrwlkdvspth 26635). Therefore, a path can be represented by an injective mapping f from { 1 , ... , n } and a mapping p from { 0 , ... , n }, which is injective restricted to the set { 1 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) different edges, and p enumerates the vertices. So the path is also represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Paths = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡(𝑝 ↾ (1..^(#‘𝑓))) ∧ ((𝑝 “ {0, (#‘𝑓)}) ∩ (𝑝 “ (1..^(#‘𝑓)))) = ∅)})
Definition	df-spths 26613*	Define the set of all simple paths (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Path (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A path is a trail in which all vertices (except possibly the first and last) are distinct. ... use the term simple path to refer to a path which contains no repeated vertices." Therefore, a simple path can be represented by an injective mapping f from { 1 , ... , n } and an injective mapping p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) different edges, and p enumerates the vertices. So the simple path is also represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ SPaths = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑝)})
Definition	df-pthson 26614*	Define the collection of paths with particular endpoints (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ PathsOn = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝑎(TrailsOn‘𝑔)𝑏)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(Paths‘𝑔)𝑝)}))
Definition	df-spthson 26615*	Define the collection of simple paths with particular endpoints (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.)
⊢ SPathsOn = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔), 𝑏 ∈ (Vtx‘𝑔) ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝑎(TrailsOn‘𝑔)𝑏)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(SPaths‘𝑔)𝑝)}))
Theorem	relpths 26616	The set (Paths‘𝐺) of all paths on 𝐺 is a set of pairs by our definition of a path, and so is a relation. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ Rel (Paths‘𝐺)
Theorem	pthsfval 26617*	The set of paths (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (Paths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡(𝑝 ↾ (1..^(#‘𝑓))) ∧ ((𝑝 “ {0, (#‘𝑓)}) ∩ (𝑝 “ (1..^(#‘𝑓)))) = ∅)}
Theorem	spthsfval 26618*	The set of simple paths (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (SPaths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑝)}
Theorem	ispth 26619	Conditions for a pair of classes/functions to be a path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1..^(#‘𝐹))) ∧ ((𝑃 “ {0, (#‘𝐹)}) ∩ (𝑃 “ (1..^(#‘𝐹)))) = ∅))
Theorem	isspth 26620	Conditions for a pair of classes/functions to be a simple path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃))
Theorem	pthistrl 26621	A path is a trail (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	spthispth 26622	A simple path is a path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 21-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthiswlk 26623	A path is a walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by AV, 6-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	spthiswlk 26624	A simple path is a walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by AV, 16-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthdivtx 26625	The inner vertices of a path are distinct from all other vertices. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐼 ∈ (1..^(#‘𝐹)) ∧ 𝐽 ∈ (0...(#‘𝐹)) ∧ 𝐼 ≠ 𝐽)) → (𝑃‘𝐼) ≠ (𝑃‘𝐽))
Theorem	pthdadjvtx 26626	The adjacent vertices of a path of length at least 2 are distinct. (Contributed by AV, 5-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 1 < (#‘𝐹) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))) → (𝑃‘𝐼) ≠ (𝑃‘(𝐼 + 1)))
Theorem	2pthnloop 26627*	A path of length at least 2 does not contain a loop. In contrast, a path of length 1 can contain/be a loop, see lppthon 27011. (Contributed by AV, 6-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 1 < (#‘𝐹)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))2 ≤ (#‘(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))))
Theorem	upgr2pthnlp 26628*	A path of length at least 2 in a pseudograph does not contain a loop. (Contributed by AV, 6-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ 1 < (#‘𝐹)) → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(#‘(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖))) = 2)
Theorem	spthdifv 26629	The vertices of a simple path are distinct, so the vertex function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))–1-1→(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	spthdep 26630	A simple path (at least of length 1) has different start and end points (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) ≠ 0) → (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))
Theorem	pthdepisspth 26631	A path with different start and end points is a simple path (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 12-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))) → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkdvdelem 26632*	Lemma for upgrwlkdvde 26633. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))–1-1→𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼) → (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} → Fun ◡𝐹))
Theorem	upgrwlkdvde 26633	In a pseudograph, all edges of a walk consisting of different vertices are different. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, see the counterexample given in the comment of upgrspthswlk 26634. (Contributed by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	upgrspthswlk 26634*	The set of simple paths in a pseudograph, expressed as walk. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, since a walk with distinct vertices does not need to be a trail: let E = { p0, p1, p2 } be a hyperedge, then ( p0, e, p1, e, p2 ) is walk with distinct vertices, but not with distinct edges. Therefore, E is not a trail and, by definition, also no path. (Contributed by AV, 11-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 17-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (SPaths‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ Fun ◡𝑝)})
Theorem	upgrwlkdvspth 26635	A walk consisting of different vertices is a simple path. Notice that this theorem would not hold for arbitrary hypergraphs, see the counterexample given in the comment of upgrspthswlk 26634. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ Fun ◡𝑃) → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthsonfval 26636*	The set of paths between two vertices (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(Paths‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	spthson 26637*	The set of simple paths between two vertices (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑝 ∧ 𝑓(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑝)})
Theorem	ispthson 26638	Properties of a pair of functions to be a path between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	isspthson 26639	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple path between two given vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 21-Mar-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	pthsonprop 26640	Properties of a path between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	spthonprop 26641	Properties of a simple path between two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → ((𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V) ∧ (𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ∧ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)))
Theorem	pthonispth 26642	A path between two vertices is a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Dec-2017.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	pthontrlon 26643	A path between two vertices is a trail between these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(TrailsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	pthonpth 26644	A path is a path between its endpoints. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(PathsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))𝑃)
Theorem	isspthonpth 26645	A pair of functions is a simple path between two given vertices iff it is a simple path starting and ending at the two vertices. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Jan-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍)) → (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	spthonisspth 26646	A simple path between to vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	spthonpthon 26647	A simple path between two vertices is a path between these vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → 𝐹(𝐴(PathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃)
Theorem	spthonepeq 26648	The endpoints of a simple path between two vertices are equal iff the path is of length 0. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 18-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ (#‘𝐹) = 0))
Theorem	uhgrwkspthlem1 26649	Lemma 1 for uhgrwkspth 26651. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 1) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	uhgrwkspthlem2 26650	Lemma 2 for uhgrwkspth 26651. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ ((#‘𝐹) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑃‘0) = 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)) = 𝐵)) → Fun ◡𝑃)
Theorem	uhgrwkspth 26651	Any walk of length 1 between two different vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 25-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 1 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2wlkneq 26652	The vertices and edges are pairwise different in a walk of length 2 in a simple graph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) ∧ ((#‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))) → (((𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘1) ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘2) ∧ (𝑃‘1) ≠ (𝑃‘2)) ∧ (𝐹‘0) ≠ (𝐹‘1)))
Theorem	usgr2wlkspthlem1 26653	Lemma 1 for usgr2wlkspth 26655. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 26-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))) → Fun ◡𝐹)
Theorem	usgr2wlkspthlem2 26654	Lemma 2 for usgr2wlkspth 26655. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))) → Fun ◡𝑃)
Theorem	usgr2wlkspth 26655	In a simple graph, any walk of length 2 between two different vertices is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 27-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → (𝐹(𝐴(WalksOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(𝐴(SPathsOn‘𝐺)𝐵)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2trlncl 26656	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 does not start and end at the same vertex. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝑃‘0) ≠ (𝑃‘2)))
Theorem	usgr2trlspth 26657	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 is a simple path. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2pthspth 26658	In a simple graph, any path of length 2 is a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	usgr2pthlem 26659*	Lemma for usgr2pth 26660. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐹:(0..^(#‘𝐹))–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑖)) = {(𝑃‘𝑖), (𝑃‘(𝑖 + 1))}) → ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑧) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑦, 𝑧}))))
Theorem	usgr2pth 26660*	In a simple graph, there is a path of length 2 iff there are three distinct vertices so that one of them is connected to each of the two others by an edge. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)–1-1→𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑧) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑦} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑦, 𝑧})))))
Theorem	usgr2pth0 26661*	In a simply graph, there is a path of length 2 iff there are three distinct vertices so that one of them is connected to each of the two others by an edge. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Jan-2018.) (Revised by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ USGraph → ((𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) ↔ (𝐹:(0..^2)–1-1→dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...2)–1-1→𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥})∃𝑧 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {𝑥, 𝑦})(((𝑃‘0) = 𝑥 ∧ (𝑃‘1) = 𝑧 ∧ (𝑃‘2) = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘0)) = {𝑥, 𝑧} ∧ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘1)) = {𝑧, 𝑦})))))
Theorem	pthdlem1 26662*	Lemma 1 for pthd 26665. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 13-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 9-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((#‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Fun ◡(𝑃 ↾ (1..^𝑅)))
Theorem	pthdlem2lem 26663*	Lemma for pthdlem2 26664. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((#‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (#‘𝑃) ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐼 = 0 ∨ 𝐼 = 𝑅)) → (𝑃‘𝐼) ∉ (𝑃 “ (1..^𝑅)))
Theorem	pthdlem2 26664*	Lemma 2 for pthd 26665. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 10-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((#‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑃 “ {0, 𝑅}) ∩ (𝑃 “ (1..^𝑅))) = ∅)
Theorem	pthd 26665*	Two words representing a trail which also represent a path in a graph. (Contributed by AV, 10-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ Word V)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((#‘𝑃) − 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑖 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝑃))∀𝑗 ∈ (1..^𝑅)(𝑖 ≠ 𝑗 → (𝑃‘𝑖) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑗)))    &   ⊢ (#‘𝐹) = 𝑅    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
16.3.5  Closed walks
Syntax	cclwlks 26666	Extend class notation with closed walks (of a graph).
class ClWalks
Definition	df-clwlks 26667*	Define the set of all closed walks (in an undirected graph). According to definition 4 in [Huneke] p. 2: "A walk of length n on (a graph) G is an ordered sequence v0 , v1 , ... v(n) of vertices such that v(i) and v(i+1) are neighbors (i.e are connected by an edge). We say the walk is closed if v(n) = v0". According to the definition of a walk as two mappings f from { 0 , ... , ( n - 1 ) } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices, a closed walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(0)) p(1) e(f(1)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n-1)) p(n)=p(0). Notice that by this definition, a single vertex is a closed walk of length 0, see also 0clwlk 26991! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 12-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ClWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(#‘𝑓)))})
Theorem	clwlks 26668*	The set of closed walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Revised by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Walks‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(#‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	isclwlk 26669	A pair of functions represents a closed walk iff it represents a walk in which the first vertex is equal to the last vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkiswlk 26670	A closed walk is a walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 15-Mar-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	clwlkwlk 26671	Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → 𝑊 ∈ (Walks‘𝐺))
Theorem	clwlkswks 26672	Closed walks are walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Aug-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ⊆ (Walks‘𝐺)
Theorem	isclwlke 26673*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a closed walk (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	isclwlkupgr 26674*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a closed walk (in a pseudograph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 11-Apr-2021.) (Revised by AV, 28-Oct-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	clwlkcomp 26675*	A closed walk expressed by properties of its components. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (𝑆 × 𝑇)) → (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))))
Theorem	clwlkcompim 26676*	Implications for the properties of the components of a closed walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 17-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ (∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))if-((𝑃‘𝑘) = (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘)}, {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘))) ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹)))))
Theorem	upgrclwlkcompim 26677*	Implications for the properties of the components of a closed walk in a pseudograph. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 24-Jun-2018.) (Revised by AV, 2-May-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (1st ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑃 = (2nd ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝑊 ∈ (ClWalks‘𝐺)) → ((𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(#‘𝐹))⟶𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(#‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))} ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))
Theorem	clwlkl1loop 26678	A closed walk of length 1 is a loop. (Contributed by AV, 22-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((Fun (iEdg‘𝐺) ∧ 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 1) → ((𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘1) ∧ {(𝑃‘0)} ∈ (Edg‘𝐺)))
16.3.6  Circuits and cycles
Syntax	ccrcts 26679	Extend class notation with circuits (in a graph).
class Circuits
Syntax	ccycls 26680	Extend class notation with cycles (in a graph).
class Cycles
Definition	df-crcts 26681*	Define the set of all circuits (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Cycle (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A circuit can be a closed walk allowing repetitions of vertices but not edges;"; according to Wikipedia ("Glossary of graph theory terms", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_graph_theory_terms, 3-Oct-2017): "A circuit may refer to ... a trail (a closed tour without repeated edges), ...". Following Bollobas ("A trail whose endvertices coincide (a closed trail) is called a circuit.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 5.), a circuit is a closed trail without repeated edges. So the circuit is also represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Circuits = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(#‘𝑓)))})
Definition	df-cycls 26682*	Define the set of all (simple) cycles (in an undirected graph). According to Wikipedia ("Cycle (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A simple cycle may be defined either as a closed walk with no repetitions of vertices and edges allowed, other than the repetition of the starting and ending vertex," According to Bollobas: "If a walk W = x0 x1 ... x(l) is such that l >= 3, x0=x(l), and the vertices x(i), 0 < i < l, are distinct from each other and x0, then W is said to be a cycle.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 5. However, since a walk consisting of distinct vertices (except the first and the last vertex) is a path, a cycle can be defined as path whose first and last vertices coincide. So a cycle is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n)=p(0). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 3-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ Cycles = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Paths‘𝑔)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(#‘𝑓)))})
Theorem	crcts 26683*	The set of circuits (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (Circuits‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Trails‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(#‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	cycls 26684*	The set of cycles (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (Cycles‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓(Paths‘𝐺)𝑝 ∧ (𝑝‘0) = (𝑝‘(#‘𝑓)))}
Theorem	iscrct 26685	Sufficient and necessary conditions for a pair of functions to be a circuit (in an undirected graph): A pair of function "is" (represents) a circuit iff it is a closed trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))
Theorem	iscycl 26686	Sufficient and necessary conditions for a pair of functions to be a cycle (in an undirected graph): A pair of function "is" (represents) a cycle iff it is a closed path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Revised by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))
Theorem	crctprop 26687	The properties of a circuit: A circuit is a closed trail. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))
Theorem	cyclprop 26688	The properties of a cycle: A cycle is a closed path. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘(#‘𝐹))))
Theorem	crctisclwlk 26689	A circuit is a closed walk. (Contributed by AV, 17-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(ClWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	crctistrl 26690	A circuit is a trail. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	crctiswlk 26691	A circuit is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 6-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cyclispth 26692	A cycle is a path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Paths‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cycliswlk 26693	A cycle is a walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cycliscrct 26694	A cycle is a circuit. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	cyclnspth 26695	A (non trivial) cycle is not a simple path. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ≠ ∅ → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → ¬ 𝐹(SPaths‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	cyclispthon 26696	A cycle is a path starting and ending at its first vertex. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹((𝑃‘0)(PathsOn‘𝐺)(𝑃‘0))𝑃)
Theorem	lfgrn1cycl 26697*	In a loop-free graph there are no cycles with length 1 (consisting of one edge). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Feb-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐼:dom 𝐼⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (#‘𝑥)} → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 → (#‘𝐹) ≠ 1))
Theorem	usgr2trlncrct 26698	In a simple graph, any trail of length 2 is not a circuit. (Contributed by AV, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USGraph ∧ (#‘𝐹) = 2) → (𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃 → ¬ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	umgrn1cycl 26699	In a multigraph graph (with no loops!) there are no cycles with length 1 (consisting of one edge). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 7-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 2-Feb-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UMGraph ∧ 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃) → (#‘𝐹) ≠ 1)
Theorem	uspgrn2crct 26700	In a simple pseudograph there are no circuits with length 2 (consisting of two edges). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 9-Nov-2017.) (Revised by AV, 3-Feb-2021.) (Proof shortened by AV, 31-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ USPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Circuits‘𝐺)𝑃) → (#‘𝐹) ≠ 2)