Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 100 of 426) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27775) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27776-29300) |
Users' Mathboxes
(29301-42551) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | 0r 9901 | The constant 0R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 0R ∈ R | ||
Theorem | 1sr 9902 | The constant 1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 1R ∈ R | ||
Theorem | m1r 9903 | The constant -1R is a signed real. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ -1R ∈ R | ||
Theorem | addclsr 9904 | Closure of addition on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 +R 𝐵) ∈ R) | ||
Theorem | mulclsr 9905 | Closure of multiplication on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ∈ R) | ||
Theorem | dmaddsr 9906 | Domain of addition on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ dom +R = (R × R) | ||
Theorem | dmmulsr 9907 | Domain of multiplication on signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ dom ·R = (R × R) | ||
Theorem | addcomsr 9908 | Addition of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 +R 𝐵) = (𝐵 +R 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | addasssr 9909 | Addition of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 +R 𝐵) +R 𝐶) = (𝐴 +R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | mulcomsr 9910 | Multiplication of signed reals is commutative. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ·R 𝐵) = (𝐵 ·R 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | mulasssr 9911 | Multiplication of signed reals is associative. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) ·R 𝐶) = (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | distrsr 9912 | Multiplication of signed reals is distributive. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ·R (𝐵 +R 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ·R 𝐵) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | m1p1sr 9913 | Minus one plus one is zero for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (-1R +R 1R) = 0R | ||
Theorem | m1m1sr 9914 | Minus one times minus one is plus one for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (-1R ·R -1R) = 1R | ||
Theorem | ltsosr 9915 | Signed real 'less than' is a strict ordering. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ <R Or R | ||
Theorem | 0lt1sr 9916 | 0 is less than 1 for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 0R <R 1R | ||
Theorem | 1ne0sr 9917 | 1 and 0 are distinct for signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ 1R = 0R | ||
Theorem | 0idsr 9918 | The signed real number 0 is an identity element for addition of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R 0R) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 1idsr 9919 | 1 is an identity element for multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 1R) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 00sr 9920 | A signed real times 0 is 0. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 ·R 0R) = 0R) | ||
Theorem | ltasr 9921 | Ordering property of addition. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ R → (𝐴 <R 𝐵 ↔ (𝐶 +R 𝐴) <R (𝐶 +R 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | pn0sr 9922 | A signed real plus its negative is zero. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → (𝐴 +R (𝐴 ·R -1R)) = 0R) | ||
Theorem | negexsr 9923* | Existence of negative signed real. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ R → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 +R 𝑥) = 0R) | ||
Theorem | recexsrlem 9924* | The reciprocal of a positive signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (0R <R 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R) | ||
Theorem | addgt0sr 9925 | The sum of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 +R 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | mulgt0sr 9926 | The product of two positive signed reals is positive. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((0R <R 𝐴 ∧ 0R <R 𝐵) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | sqgt0sr 9927 | The square of a nonzero signed real is positive. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → 0R <R (𝐴 ·R 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | recexsr 9928* | The reciprocal of a nonzero signed real exists. Part of Proposition 9-4.3 of [Gleason] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0R) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (𝐴 ·R 𝑥) = 1R) | ||
Theorem | mappsrpr 9929 | Mapping from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R (𝐶 +R [〈𝐴, 1P〉] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ P) | ||
Theorem | ltpsrpr 9930 | Mapping of order from positive signed reals to positive reals. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 +R [〈𝐴, 1P〉] ~R ) <R (𝐶 +R [〈𝐵, 1P〉] ~R ) ↔ 𝐴<P 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | map2psrpr 9931* | Equivalence for positive signed real. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 +R -1R) <R 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ P (𝐶 +R [〈𝑥, 1P〉] ~R ) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | supsrlem 9932* | Lemma for supremum theorem. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = {𝑤 ∣ (𝐶 +R [〈𝑤, 1P〉] ~R ) ∈ 𝐴} & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ R ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | supsr 9933* | A nonempty, bounded set of signed reals has a supremum. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ R ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ R (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <R 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ R (𝑦 <R 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <R 𝑧))) | ||
Syntax | cc 9934 | Class of complex numbers. |
class ℂ | ||
Syntax | cr 9935 | Class of real numbers. |
class ℝ | ||
Syntax | cc0 9936 | Extend class notation to include the complex number 0. |
class 0 | ||
Syntax | c1 9937 | Extend class notation to include the complex number 1. |
class 1 | ||
Syntax | ci 9938 | Extend class notation to include the complex number i. |
class i | ||
Syntax | caddc 9939 | Addition on complex numbers. |
class + | ||
Syntax | cltrr 9940 | 'Less than' predicate (defined over real subset of complex numbers). |
class <ℝ | ||
Syntax | cmul 9941 | Multiplication on complex numbers. The token · is a center dot. |
class · | ||
Definition | df-c 9942 | Define the set of complex numbers. The 23 axioms for complex numbers start at axresscn 9969. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℂ = (R × R) | ||
Definition | df-0 9943 | Define the complex number 0. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 0 = 〈0R, 0R〉 | ||
Definition | df-1 9944 | Define the complex number 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 1 = 〈1R, 0R〉 | ||
Definition | df-i 9945 | Define the complex number i (the imaginary unit). (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ i = 〈0R, 1R〉 | ||
Definition | df-r 9946 | Define the set of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℝ = (R × {0R}) | ||
Definition | df-add 9947* | Define addition over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ + = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 〈(𝑤 +R 𝑢), (𝑣 +R 𝑓)〉))} | ||
Definition | df-mul 9948* | Define multiplication over complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ · = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = 〈𝑤, 𝑣〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑢, 𝑓〉) ∧ 𝑧 = 〈((𝑤 ·R 𝑢) +R (-1R ·R (𝑣 ·R 𝑓))), ((𝑣 ·R 𝑢) +R (𝑤 ·R 𝑓))〉))} | ||
Definition | df-lt 9949* | Define 'less than' on the real subset of complex numbers. Proofs should typically use < instead; see df-ltxr 10079. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ <ℝ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑧∃𝑤((𝑥 = 〈𝑧, 0R〉 ∧ 𝑦 = 〈𝑤, 0R〉) ∧ 𝑧 <R 𝑤))} | ||
Theorem | opelcn 9950 | Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 ∈ ℂ ↔ (𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R)) | ||
Theorem | opelreal 9951 | Ordered pair membership in class of real subset of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (〈𝐴, 0R〉 ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝐴 ∈ R) | ||
Theorem | elreal 9952* | Membership in class of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ R 〈𝑥, 0R〉 = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | elreal2 9953 | Ordered pair membership in the class of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ R ∧ 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), 0R〉)) | ||
Theorem | 0ncn 9954 | The empty set is not a complex number. Note: do not use this after the real number axioms are developed, since it is a construction-dependent property. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | ltrelre 9955 | 'Less than' is a relation on real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ <ℝ ⊆ (ℝ × ℝ) | ||
Theorem | addcnsr 9956 | Addition of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 + 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = 〈(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)〉) | ||
Theorem | mulcnsr 9957 | Multiplication of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 9-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 · 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) = 〈((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))〉) | ||
Theorem | eqresr 9958 | Equality of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐴, 0R〉 = 〈𝐵, 0R〉 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | addresr 9959 | Addition of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (〈𝐴, 0R〉 + 〈𝐵, 0R〉) = 〈(𝐴 +R 𝐵), 0R〉) | ||
Theorem | mulresr 9960 | Multiplication of real numbers in terms of intermediate signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) → (〈𝐴, 0R〉 · 〈𝐵, 0R〉) = 〈(𝐴 ·R 𝐵), 0R〉) | ||
Theorem | ltresr 9961 | Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (〈𝐴, 0R〉 <ℝ 〈𝐵, 0R〉 ↔ 𝐴 <R 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | ltresr2 9962 | Ordering of real subset of complex numbers in terms of signed reals. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ (1st ‘𝐴) <R (1st ‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | dfcnqs 9963 | Technical trick to permit reuse of previous lemmas to prove arithmetic operation laws in ℂ from those in R. The trick involves qsid 7813, which shows that the coset of the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation) acts as an identity divisor for the quotient set operation. This lets us "pretend" that ℂ is a quotient set, even though it is not (compare df-c 9942), and allows us to reuse some of the equivalence class lemmas we developed for the transition from positive reals to signed reals, etc. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℂ = ((R × R) / ◡ E ) | ||
Theorem | addcnsrec 9964 | Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for operation laws. See dfcnqs 9963 and mulcnsrec 9965. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉]◡ E + [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉]◡ E ) = [〈(𝐴 +R 𝐶), (𝐵 +R 𝐷)〉]◡ E ) | ||
Theorem | mulcnsrec 9965 |
Technical trick to permit re-use of some equivalence class lemmas for
operation laws. The trick involves ecid 7812,
which shows that the coset of
the converse epsilon relation (which is not an equivalence relation)
leaves a set unchanged. See also dfcnqs 9963.
Note: This is the last lemma (from which the axioms will be derived) in the construction of real and complex numbers. The construction starts at cnpi 9666. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ R ∧ 𝐵 ∈ R) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ R ∧ 𝐷 ∈ R)) → ([〈𝐴, 𝐵〉]◡ E · [〈𝐶, 𝐷〉]◡ E ) = [〈((𝐴 ·R 𝐶) +R (-1R ·R (𝐵 ·R 𝐷))), ((𝐵 ·R 𝐶) +R (𝐴 ·R 𝐷))〉]◡ E ) | ||
Theorem | axaddf 9966 | Addition is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axaddcl 9972. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-addf 10015. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ + :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
Theorem | axmulf 9967 | Multiplication is an operation on the complex numbers. This theorem can be used as an alternate axiom for complex numbers in place of the less specific axmulcl 9974. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulf 10016. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ · :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ | ||
Theorem | axcnex 9968 | The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant in the presence of the other axioms (see cnexALT 11828), but the proof requires the axiom of replacement, while the derivation from the construction here does not. Thus, we can avoid ax-rep 4771 in later theorems by invoking the axiom ax-cnex 9992 instead of cnexALT 11828. Use cnex 10017 instead. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℂ ∈ V | ||
Theorem | axresscn 9969 | The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-resscn 9993. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ | ||
Theorem | ax1cn 9970 | 1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1cn 9994. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2007.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | axicn 9971 | i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-icn 9995. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ i ∈ ℂ | ||
Theorem | axaddcl 9972 | Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addcl 9996 be used later. Instead, in most cases use addcl 10018. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | axaddrcl 9973 | Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 5 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addrcl 9997 be used later. Instead, in most cases use readdcl 10019. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | axmulcl 9974 | Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcl 9998 be used later. Instead, in most cases use mulcl 10020. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Theorem | axmulrcl 9975 | Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulrcl 9999 be used later. Instead, in most cases use remulcl 10021. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1996.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Theorem | axmulcom 9976 | Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-mulcom 10000 be used later. Instead, use mulcom 10022. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | axaddass 9977 | Addition of complex numbers is associative. This theorem transfers the associative laws for the real and imaginary signed real components of complex number pairs, to complex number addition itself. Axiom 9 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-addass 10001 be used later. Instead, use addass 10023. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) + 𝐶) = (𝐴 + (𝐵 + 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | axmulass 9978 | Multiplication of complex numbers is associative. Axiom 10 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-mulass 10002. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) · 𝐶) = (𝐴 · (𝐵 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | axdistr 9979 | Distributive law for complex numbers (left-distributivity). Axiom 11 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly, nor should the proven axiom ax-distr 10003 be used later. Instead, use adddi 10025. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-1995.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · (𝐵 + 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 · 𝐵) + (𝐴 · 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | axi2m1 9980 | i-squared equals -1 (expressed as i-squared plus 1 is 0). Axiom 12 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-i2m1 10004. (Contributed by NM, 5-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((i · i) + 1) = 0 | ||
Theorem | ax1ne0 9981 | 1 and 0 are distinct. Axiom 13 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1ne0 10005. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 1 ≠ 0 | ||
Theorem | ax1rid 9982 | 1 is an identity element for real multiplication. Axiom 14 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Weakened from the original axiom in the form of statement in mulid1 10037, based on ideas by Eric Schmidt. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-1rid 10006. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 3-Jan-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 1) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | axrnegex 9983* | Existence of negative of real number. Axiom 15 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rnegex 10007. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 0) | ||
Theorem | axrrecex 9984* | Existence of reciprocal of nonzero real number. Axiom 16 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-rrecex 10008. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (𝐴 · 𝑥) = 1) | ||
Theorem | axcnre 9985* | A complex number can be expressed in terms of two reals. Definition 10-1.1(v) of [Gleason] p. 130. Axiom 17 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-cnre 10009. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 = (𝑥 + (i · 𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | axpre-lttri 9986 | Ordering on reals satisfies strict trichotomy. Axiom 18 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttri 10109. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttri 10010. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | axpre-lttrn 9987 | Ordering on reals is transitive. Axiom 19 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axlttrn 10110. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-lttrn 10011. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 <ℝ 𝐶) → 𝐴 <ℝ 𝐶)) | ||
Theorem | axpre-ltadd 9988 | Ordering property of addition on reals. Axiom 20 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axltadd 10111. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-ltadd 10012. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 <ℝ 𝐵 → (𝐶 + 𝐴) <ℝ (𝐶 + 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | axpre-mulgt0 9989 | The product of two positive reals is positive. Axiom 21 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version for extended reals is axmulgt0 10112. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-mulgt0 10013. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1996.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → ((0 <ℝ 𝐴 ∧ 0 <ℝ 𝐵) → 0 <ℝ (𝐴 · 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | axpre-sup 9990* | A nonempty, bounded-above set of reals has a supremum. Axiom 22 of 22 for real and complex numbers, derived from ZF set theory. Note: The more general version with ordering on extended reals is axsup 10113. This construction-dependent theorem should not be referenced directly; instead, use ax-pre-sup 10014. (Contributed by NM, 19-May-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Jun-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 <ℝ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 <ℝ 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 <ℝ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | wuncn 9991 | A weak universe containing ω contains the complex number construction. This theorem is construction-dependent in the literal sense, but will also be satisfied by any other reasonable implementation of the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ WUni) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ω ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ℂ ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Axiom | ax-cnex 9992 | The complex numbers form a set. This axiom is redundant - see cnexALT 11828- but we provide this axiom because the justification theorem axcnex 9968 does not use ax-rep 4771 even though the redundancy proof does. Proofs should normally use cnex 10017 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ ℂ ∈ V | ||
Axiom | ax-resscn 9993 | The real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers. Axiom 1 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axresscn 9969. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ ℝ ⊆ ℂ | ||
Axiom | ax-1cn 9994 | 1 is a complex number. Axiom 2 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem ax1cn 9970. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ 1 ∈ ℂ | ||
Axiom | ax-icn 9995 | i is a complex number. Axiom 3 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axicn 9971. (Contributed by NM, 1-Mar-1995.) |
⊢ i ∈ ℂ | ||
Axiom | ax-addcl 9996 | Closure law for addition of complex numbers. Axiom 4 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axaddcl 9972. Proofs should normally use addcl 10018 instead, which asserts the same thing but follows our naming conventions for closures. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Axiom | ax-addrcl 9997 | Closure law for addition in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 23 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axaddrcl 9973. Proofs should normally use readdcl 10019 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 + 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Axiom | ax-mulcl 9998 | Closure law for multiplication of complex numbers. Axiom 6 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulcl 9974. Proofs should normally use mulcl 10020 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℂ) | ||
Axiom | ax-mulrcl 9999 | Closure law for multiplication in the real subfield of complex numbers. Axiom 7 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulrcl 9975. Proofs should normally use remulcl 10021 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) ∈ ℝ) | ||
Axiom | ax-mulcom 10000 | Multiplication of complex numbers is commutative. Axiom 8 of 22 for real and complex numbers, justified by theorem axmulcom 9976. Proofs should normally use mulcom 10022 instead. (New usage is discouraged.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = (𝐵 · 𝐴)) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |