Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 76 of 426) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-27775) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(27776-29300) |
Users' Mathboxes
(29301-42551) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | tz7.44lem1 7501* | 𝐺 is a function. Lemma for tz7.44-1 7502, tz7.44-2 7503, and tz7.44-3 7504. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) ∨ (¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ Lim dom 𝑥) ∧ 𝑦 = (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))) ∨ (Lim dom 𝑥 ∧ 𝑦 = ∪ ran 𝑥))} ⇒ ⊢ Fun 𝐺 | ||
Theorem | tz7.44-1 7502* | The value of 𝐹 at ∅. Part 1 of Theorem 7.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if(𝑥 = ∅, 𝐴, if(Lim dom 𝑥, ∪ ran 𝑥, (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))))) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (∅ ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹‘∅) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | tz7.44-2 7503* | The value of 𝐹 at a successor ordinal. Part 2 of Theorem 7.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 49. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if(𝑥 = ∅, 𝐴, if(Lim dom 𝑥, ∪ ran 𝑥, (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))))) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑦) ∈ V) & ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝑋 & ⊢ Ord 𝑋 ⇒ ⊢ (suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | tz7.44-3 7504* | The value of 𝐹 at a limit ordinal. Part 3 of Theorem 7.44 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if(𝑥 = ∅, 𝐴, if(Lim dom 𝑥, ∪ ran 𝑥, (𝐻‘(𝑥‘∪ dom 𝑥))))) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝐹 ↾ 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝑦) ∈ V) & ⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝑋 & ⊢ Ord 𝑋 ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐹‘𝐵) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
Syntax | crdg 7505 | Extend class notation with the recursive definition generator, with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼. |
class rec(𝐹, 𝐼) | ||
Definition | df-rdg 7506* |
Define a recursive definition generator on On (the
class of ordinal
numbers) with characteristic function 𝐹 and initial value 𝐼.
This combines functions 𝐹 in tfr1 7493
and 𝐺 in tz7.44-1 7502 into one
definition. This rather amazing operation allows us to define, with
compact direct definitions, functions that are usually defined in
textbooks only with indirect self-referencing recursive definitions. A
recursive definition requires advanced metalogic to justify - in
particular, eliminating a recursive definition is very difficult and
often not even shown in textbooks. On the other hand, the elimination
of a direct definition is a matter of simple mechanical substitution.
The price paid is the daunting complexity of our rec operation
(especially when df-recs 7468 that it is built on is also eliminated). But
once we get past this hurdle, definitions that would otherwise be
recursive become relatively simple, as in for example oav 7591,
from which
we prove the recursive textbook definition as theorems oa0 7596,
oasuc 7604,
and oalim 7612 (with the help of theorems rdg0 7517,
rdgsuc 7520, and
rdglim2a 7529). We can also restrict the rec operation to define
otherwise recursive functions on the natural numbers ω; see
fr0g 7531 and frsuc 7532. Our rec
operation apparently does not appear
in published literature, although closely related is Definition 25.2 of
[Quine] p. 177, which he uses to
"turn...a recursion into a genuine or
direct definition" (p. 174). Note that the if operations (see
df-if 4087) select cases based on whether the domain of
𝑔
is zero, a
successor, or a limit ordinal.
An important use of this definition is in the recursive sequence generator df-seq 12802 on the natural numbers (as a subset of the complex numbers), allowing us to define, with direct definitions, recursive infinite sequences such as the factorial function df-fac 13061 and integer powers df-exp 12861. Note: We introduce rec with the philosophical goal of being able to eliminate all definitions with direct mechanical substitution and to verify easily the soundness of definitions. Metamath itself has no built-in technical limitation that prevents multiple-part recursive definitions in the traditional textbook style. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.) |
⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = recs((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if(𝑔 = ∅, 𝐼, if(Lim dom 𝑔, ∪ ran 𝑔, (𝐹‘(𝑔‘∪ dom 𝑔)))))) | ||
Theorem | rdgeq1 7507 | Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐺, 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | rdgeq2 7508 | Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐹, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rdgeq12 7509 | Equality theorem for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Apr-2012.) |
⊢ ((𝐹 = 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → rec(𝐹, 𝐴) = rec(𝐺, 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | nfrdg 7510 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥rec(𝐹, 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rdglem1 7511* | Lemma used with the recursive definition generator. This is a trivial lemma that just changes bound variables for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
⊢ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐺‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} | ||
Theorem | rdgfun 7512 | The recursive definition generator is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ Fun rec(𝐹, 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rdgdmlim 7513 | The domain of the recursive definition generator is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ Lim dom rec(𝐹, 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rdgfnon 7514 | The recursive definition generator is a function on ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-May-2015.) |
⊢ rec(𝐹, 𝐴) Fn On | ||
Theorem | rdgvalg 7515* | Value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom rec(𝐹, 𝐴) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if(𝑔 = ∅, 𝐴, if(Lim dom 𝑔, ∪ ran 𝑔, (𝐹‘(𝑔‘∪ dom 𝑔)))))‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rdgval 7516* | Value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = ((𝑔 ∈ V ↦ if(𝑔 = ∅, 𝐴, if(Lim dom 𝑔, ∪ ran 𝑔, (𝐹‘(𝑔‘∪ dom 𝑔)))))‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rdg0 7517 | The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴 | ||
Theorem | rdgseg 7518 | The initial segments of the recursive definition generator are sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom rec(𝐹, 𝐴) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ 𝐵) ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | rdgsucg 7519 | The value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ dom rec(𝐹, 𝐴) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rdgsuc 7520 | The value of the recursive definition generator at a successor. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ On → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | rdglimg 7521 | The value of the recursive definition generator at a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ dom rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = ∪ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rdglim 7522 | The value of the recursive definition generator at a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = ∪ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) “ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | rdg0g 7523 | The initial value of the recursive definition generator. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | rdgsucmptf 7524 | The value of the recursive definition generator at a successor (special case where the characteristic function uses the map operation). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 & ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | rdgsucmptnf 7525 | The value of the recursive definition generator at a successor (special case where the characteristic function is an ordered-pair class abstraction and where the mapping class 𝐷 is a proper class). This is a technical lemma that can be used together with rdgsucmptf 7524 to help eliminate redundant sethood antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 & ⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐷 ∈ V → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | rdgsucmpt2 7526* | This version of rdgsucmpt 7527 avoids the not-free hypothesis of rdgsucmptf 7524 by using two substitutions instead of one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝐸 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐸 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | rdgsucmpt 7527* | The value of the recursive definition generator at a successor (special case where the characteristic function uses the map operation). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | rdglim2 7528* | The value of the recursive definition generator at a limit ordinal, in terms of the union of all smaller values. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1995.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 = (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥)}) | ||
Theorem | rdglim2a 7529* | The value of the recursive definition generator at a limit ordinal, in terms of indexed union of all smaller values. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-1998.) |
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑥)) | ||
Theorem | frfnom 7530 | The function generated by finite recursive definition generation is a function on omega. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω) Fn ω | ||
Theorem | fr0g 7531 | The initial value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘∅) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | frsuc 7532 | The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ω → ((rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘suc 𝐵) = (𝐹‘((rec(𝐹, 𝐴) ↾ ω)‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | frsucmpt 7533 | The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation (special case where the generation function is expressed in maps-to notation). (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2003.) (Revised by Scott Fenton, 2-Nov-2011.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) ↾ ω) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | frsucmptn 7534 | The value of the finite recursive definition generator at a successor (special case where the characteristic function is a mapping abstraction and where the mapping class 𝐷 is a proper class). This is a technical lemma that can be used together with frsucmpt 7533 to help eliminate redundant sethood antecedents. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Feb-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐷 & ⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) ↾ ω) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝐷 ∈ V → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | frsucmpt2 7535* | The successor value resulting from finite recursive definition generation (special case where the generation function is expressed in maps-to notation), using double-substitution instead of a bound variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝐶), 𝐴) ↾ ω) & ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝐸 = 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝐹‘𝐵) → 𝐸 = 𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹‘suc 𝐵) = 𝐷) | ||
Theorem | tz7.48lem 7536* | A way of showing an ordinal function is one-to-one. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ 𝐹 Fn On ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ¬ (𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦)) → Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | tz7.48-2 7537* | Proposition 7.48(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 5-May-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 Fn On ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)) → Fun ◡𝐹) | ||
Theorem | tz7.48-1 7538* | Proposition 7.48(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ 𝐹 Fn On ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | tz7.48-3 7539* | Proposition 7.48(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) |
⊢ 𝐹 Fn On ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)) → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | tz7.49 7540* | Proposition 7.49 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 Fn On & ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ((𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑦)) ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝐹 “ 𝑥) = 𝐴 ∧ Fun ◡(𝐹 ↾ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | tz7.49c 7541* | Corollary of Proposition 7.49 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jan-2013.) |
⊢ 𝐹 Fn On ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ((𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴 ∖ (𝐹 “ 𝑥)))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
Syntax | cseqom 7542 | Extend class notation to include index-aware recursive definitions. |
class seq𝜔(𝐹, 𝐼) | ||
Definition | df-seqom 7543* | Index-aware recursive definitions over ω. A mashup of df-rdg 7506 and df-seq 12802, this allows for recursive definitions that use an index in the recursion in cases where Infinity is not admitted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ seq𝜔(𝐹, 𝐼) = (rec((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑖, (𝑖𝐹𝑣)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) “ ω) | ||
Theorem | seqomlem0 7544* | Lemma for seq𝜔. Change bound variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ rec((𝑎 ∈ ω, 𝑏 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑎, (𝑎𝐹𝑏)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) = rec((𝑐 ∈ ω, 𝑑 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑐, (𝑐𝐹𝑑)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) | ||
Theorem | seqomlem1 7545* | Lemma for seq𝜔. The underlying recursion generates a sequence of pairs with the expected first values. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = rec((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑖, (𝑖𝐹𝑣)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝑄‘𝐴) = 〈𝐴, (2nd ‘(𝑄‘𝐴))〉) | ||
Theorem | seqomlem2 7546* | Lemma for seq𝜔. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = rec((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑖, (𝑖𝐹𝑣)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑄 “ ω) Fn ω | ||
Theorem | seqomlem3 7547* | Lemma for seq𝜔. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = rec((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑖, (𝑖𝐹𝑣)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑄 “ ω)‘∅) = ( I ‘𝐼) | ||
Theorem | seqomlem4 7548* | Lemma for seq𝜔. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Jun-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑄 = rec((𝑖 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ 〈suc 𝑖, (𝑖𝐹𝑣)〉), 〈∅, ( I ‘𝐼)〉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ((𝑄 “ ω)‘suc 𝐴) = (𝐴𝐹((𝑄 “ ω)‘𝐴))) | ||
Theorem | seqomeq12 7549 | Equality theorem for seq𝜔. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → seq𝜔(𝐴, 𝐶) = seq𝜔(𝐵, 𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | fnseqom 7550 | An index-aware recursive definition defines a function on the natural numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝜔(𝐹, 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐺 Fn ω | ||
Theorem | seqom0g 7551 | Value of an index-aware recursive definition at 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) (Revise by AV, 17-Sep-2021.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝜔(𝐹, 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝐼) | ||
Theorem | seqomsuc 7552 | Value of an index-aware recursive definition at a successor. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Nov-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐺 = seq𝜔(𝐹, 𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → (𝐺‘suc 𝐴) = (𝐴𝐹(𝐺‘𝐴))) | ||
Syntax | c1o 7553 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 1. |
class 1𝑜 | ||
Syntax | c2o 7554 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 2. |
class 2𝑜 | ||
Syntax | c3o 7555 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 3. |
class 3𝑜 | ||
Syntax | c4o 7556 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal number 4. |
class 4𝑜 | ||
Syntax | coa 7557 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal addition operation. |
class +𝑜 | ||
Syntax | comu 7558 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal multiplication operation. |
class ·𝑜 | ||
Syntax | coe 7559 | Extend the definition of a class to include the ordinal exponentiation operation. |
class ↑𝑜 | ||
Definition | df-1o 7560 | Define the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) |
⊢ 1𝑜 = suc ∅ | ||
Definition | df-2o 7561 | Define the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) |
⊢ 2𝑜 = suc 1𝑜 | ||
Definition | df-3o 7562 | Define the ordinal number 3. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 3𝑜 = suc 2𝑜 | ||
Definition | df-4o 7563 | Define the ordinal number 4. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
⊢ 4𝑜 = suc 3𝑜 | ||
Definition | df-oadd 7564* | Define the ordinal addition operation. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) |
⊢ +𝑜 = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑧), 𝑥)‘𝑦)) | ||
Definition | df-omul 7565* | Define the ordinal multiplication operation. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) |
⊢ ·𝑜 = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 +𝑜 𝑥)), ∅)‘𝑦)) | ||
Definition | df-oexp 7566* | Define the ordinal exponentiation operation. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ ↑𝑜 = (𝑥 ∈ On, 𝑦 ∈ On ↦ if(𝑥 = ∅, (1𝑜 ∖ 𝑦), (rec((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ·𝑜 𝑥)), 1𝑜)‘𝑦))) | ||
Theorem | 1on 7567 | Ordinal 1 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.) |
⊢ 1𝑜 ∈ On | ||
Theorem | 2on 7568 | Ordinal 2 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.) |
⊢ 2𝑜 ∈ On | ||
Theorem | 2on0 7569 | Ordinal two is not zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Jun-2011.) |
⊢ 2𝑜 ≠ ∅ | ||
Theorem | 3on 7570 | Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
⊢ 3𝑜 ∈ On | ||
Theorem | 4on 7571 | Ordinal 3 is an ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2016.) |
⊢ 4𝑜 ∈ On | ||
Theorem | df1o2 7572 | Expanded value of the ordinal number 1. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2002.) |
⊢ 1𝑜 = {∅} | ||
Theorem | df2o3 7573 | Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ 2𝑜 = {∅, 1𝑜} | ||
Theorem | df2o2 7574 | Expanded value of the ordinal number 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2004.) |
⊢ 2𝑜 = {∅, {∅}} | ||
Theorem | 1n0 7575 | Ordinal one is not equal to ordinal zero. (Contributed by NM, 26-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ 1𝑜 ≠ ∅ | ||
Theorem | xp01disj 7576 | Cartesian products with the singletons of ordinals 0 and 1 are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-2007.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 × {∅}) ∩ (𝐶 × {1𝑜})) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | ordgt0ge1 7577 | Two ways to express that an ordinal class is positive. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 1𝑜 ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ordge1n0 7578 | An ordinal greater than or equal to 1 is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 21-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (1𝑜 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | el1o 7579 | Membership in ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 1𝑜 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) | ||
Theorem | dif1o 7580 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a nonzero number of the set 𝐵. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ∖ 1𝑜) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
Theorem | ondif1 7581 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is a nonzero ordinal number. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1𝑜) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | ondif2 7582 | Two ways to say that 𝐴 is an ordinal greater than one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2𝑜) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1𝑜 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | 2oconcl 7583 | Closure of the pair swapping function on 2𝑜. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 2𝑜 → (1𝑜 ∖ 𝐴) ∈ 2𝑜) | ||
Theorem | 0lt1o 7584 | Ordinal zero is less than ordinal one. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ ∅ ∈ 1𝑜 | ||
Theorem | dif20el 7585 | An ordinal greater than one is greater than zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 2𝑜) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | 0we1 7586 | The empty set is a well-ordering of ordinal one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ ∅ We 1𝑜 | ||
Theorem | brwitnlem 7587 | Lemma for relations which assert the existence of a witness in a two-parameter set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝑂 “ (V ∖ 1𝑜)) & ⊢ 𝑂 Fn 𝑋 ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑂𝐵) ≠ ∅) | ||
Theorem | fnoa 7588 | Functionality and domain of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ +𝑜 Fn (On × On) | ||
Theorem | fnom 7589 | Functionality and domain of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 26-Aug-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ·𝑜 Fn (On × On) | ||
Theorem | fnoe 7590 | Functionality and domain of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2015.) |
⊢ ↑𝑜 Fn (On × On) | ||
Theorem | oav 7591* | Value of ordinal addition. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +𝑜 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑥), 𝐴)‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | omv 7592* | Value of ordinal multiplication. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·𝑜 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 +𝑜 𝐴)), ∅)‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | oe0lem 7593 | A helper lemma for oe0 7602 and others. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) |
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = ∅) → 𝜓) & ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝜑) ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓) | ||
Theorem | oev 7594* | Value of ordinal exponentiation. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑𝑜 𝐵) = if(𝐴 = ∅, (1𝑜 ∖ 𝐵), (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ·𝑜 𝐴)), 1𝑜)‘𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | oevn0 7595* | Value of ordinal exponentiation at a nonzero mantissa. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ↑𝑜 𝐵) = (rec((𝑥 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ·𝑜 𝐴)), 1𝑜)‘𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | oa0 7596 | Addition with zero. Proposition 8.3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 57. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +𝑜 ∅) = 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | om0 7597 | Ordinal multiplication with zero. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ·𝑜 ∅) = ∅) | ||
Theorem | oe0m 7598 | Ordinal exponentiation with zero mantissa. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (∅ ↑𝑜 𝐴) = (1𝑜 ∖ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | om0x 7599 | Ordinal multiplication with zero. Definition 8.15 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 62. Unlike om0 7597, this version works whether or not 𝐴 is an ordinal. However, since it is an artifact of our particular function value definition outside the domain, we will not use it in order to be conventional and present it only as a curiosity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-1996.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ·𝑜 ∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | oe0m0 7600 | Ordinal exponentiation with zero mantissa and zero exponent. Proposition 8.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2004.) |
⊢ (∅ ↑𝑜 ∅) = 1𝑜 |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |