P. 80 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 7901-8000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	fdiagfn 7901*	Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. B |-> ( I X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. V /\ I e. W ) -> F : B --> ( B ^m I ) )
Theorem	fvdiagfn 7902*	Functionality of the diagonal map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. B |-> ( I X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( I e. W /\ X e. B ) -> ( F ` X ) = ( I X. { X } ) )
Theorem	mapsnconst 7903	Every singleton map is a constant function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 25-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. ( B ^m S ) -> F = ( S X. { ( F ` X ) } ) )
Theorem	mapsncnv 7904*	Expression for the inverse of the canonical map between a set and its set of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   &    |- F = ( x e. ( B ^m S ) |-> ( x ` X ) )   =>    |- `' F = ( y e. B |-> ( S X. { y } ) )
Theorem	mapsnf1o2 7905*	Explicit bijection between a set and its singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   &    |- F = ( x e. ( B ^m S ) |-> ( x ` X ) )   =>    |- F : ( B ^m S ) -1-1-onto-> B
Theorem	mapsnf1o3 7906*	Explicit bijection in the reverse of mapsnf1o2 7905. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Mar-2015.)
|- S = { X }   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- X e. _V   &    |- F = ( y e. B |-> ( S X. { y } ) )   =>    |- F : B -1-1-onto-> ( B ^m S )
Theorem	ralxpmap 7907*	Quantification over functions in terms of quantification over values and punctured functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.)
|- ( f = ( g u. { <. J , y >. } ) -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( J e. T -> ( A. f e. ( S ^m T ) ph <-> A. y e. S A. g e. ( S ^m ( T \ { J } ) ) ps ) )
2.4.22  Infinite Cartesian products
Syntax	cixp 7908	Extend class notation to include infinite Cartesian products.
class X_ x e. A B
Definition	df-ixp 7909*	Definition of infinite Cartesian product of [Enderton] p. 54. Enderton uses a bold "X" with x e. A written underneath or as a subscript, as does Stoll p. 47. Some books use a capital pi, but we will reserve that notation for products of numbers. Usually B represents a class expression containing x free and thus can be thought of as B ( x ). Normally, x is not free in A, although this is not a requirement of the definition. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- X_ x e. A B = { f | ( f Fn { x | x e. A } /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	dfixp 7910*	Eliminate the expression { x | x e. A } in df-ixp 7909, under the assumption that A and x are disjoint. This way, we can say that x is bound in X_ x e. A B even if it appears free in A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|- X_ x e. A B = { f | ( f Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( f ` x ) e. B ) }
Theorem	ixpsnval 7911*	The value of an infinite Cartesian product with a singleton. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2018.)
|- ( X e. V -> X_ x e. { X } B = { f | ( f Fn { X } /\ ( f ` X ) e. [_ X / x ]_ B ) } )
Theorem	elixp2 7912*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. See df-ixp 7909 for discussion of the notation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B <-> ( F e. _V /\ F Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( F ` x ) e. B ) )
Theorem	fvixp 7913*	Projection of a factor of an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( x = C -> B = D )   =>    |- ( ( F e. X_ x e. A B /\ C e. A ) -> ( F ` C ) e. D )
Theorem	ixpfn 7914*	A nuple is a function. (Contributed by FL, 6-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B -> F Fn A )
Theorem	elixp 7915*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. X_ x e. A B <-> ( F Fn A /\ A. x e. A ( F ` x ) e. B ) )
Theorem	elixpconst 7916*	Membership in an infinite Cartesian product of a constant B. (Contributed by NM, 12-Apr-2008.)
|- F e. _V   =>    |- ( F e. X_ x e. A B <-> F : A --> B )
Theorem	ixpconstg 7917*	Infinite Cartesian product of a constant B. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> X_ x e. A B = ( B ^m A ) )
Theorem	ixpconst 7918*	Infinite Cartesian product of a constant B. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = ( B ^m A )
Theorem	ixpeq1 7919*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A = B -> X_ x e. A C = X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	ixpeq1d 7920*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A C = X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	ss2ixp 7921	Subclass theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Aug-2016.)
|- ( A. x e. A B C_ C -> X_ x e. A B C_ X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2 7922	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- ( A. x e. A B = C -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2dva 7923*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpeq2dv 7924*	Equality theorem for infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Jun-2016.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> X_ x e. A B = X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	cbvixp 7925*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.)
|- F/_ y B   &    |- F/_ x C   &    |- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	cbvixpv 7926*	Change bound variable in an indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|- ( x = y -> B = C )   =>    |- X_ x e. A B = X_ y e. A C
Theorem	nfixp 7927	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for indexed Cartesian product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ y B   =>    |- F/_ y X_ x e. A B
Theorem	nfixp1 7928	The index variable in an indexed Cartesian product is not free. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x X_ x e. A B
Theorem	ixpprc 7929*	A cartesian product of proper-class many sets is empty, because any function in the cartesian product has to be a set with domain A, which is not possible for a proper class domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpf 7930*	A member of an infinite Cartesian product maps to the indexed union of the product argument. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- ( F e. X_ x e. A B -> F : A --> U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	uniixp 7931*	The union of an infinite Cartesian product is included in a Cartesian product. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- U. X_ x e. A B C_ ( A X. U_ x e. A B )
Theorem	ixpexg 7932*	The existence of an infinite Cartesian product. x is normally a free-variable parameter in B. Remark in Enderton p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jan-2015.)
|- ( A. x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B e. _V )
Theorem	ixpin 7933*	The intersection of two infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- X_ x e. A ( B i^i C ) = ( X_ x e. A B i^i X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpiin 7934*	The indexed intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Feb-2015.)
|- ( B =/= (/) -> X_ x e. A |^|_ y e. B C = |^|_ y e. B X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	ixpint 7935*	The intersection of a collection of infinite Cartesian products. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( B =/= (/) -> X_ x e. A |^| B = |^|_ y e. B X_ x e. A y )
Theorem	ixp0x 7936	An infinite Cartesian product with an empty index set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Sep-2007.)
|- X_ x e. (/) A = { (/) }
Theorem	ixpssmap2g 7937*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. This version of ixpssmapg 7938 avoids ax-rep 4771. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.)
|- ( U_ x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A ) )
Theorem	ixpssmapg 7938*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x e. A B e. V -> X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A ) )
Theorem	0elixp 7939	Membership of the empty set in an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by Steve Rodriguez, 29-Sep-2006.)
|- (/) e. X_ x e. (/) A
Theorem	ixpn0 7940	The infinite Cartesian product of a family B ( x ) with an empty member is empty. The converse of this theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, see ac9 9305. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( X_ x e. A B =/= (/) -> A. x e. A B =/= (/) )
Theorem	ixp0 7941	The infinite Cartesian product of a family B ( x ) with an empty member is empty. The converse of this theorem is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice, see ac9 9305. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|- ( E. x e. A B = (/) -> X_ x e. A B = (/) )
Theorem	ixpssmap 7942*	An infinite Cartesian product is a subset of set exponentiation. Remark in [Enderton] p. 54. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2006.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- X_ x e. A B C_ ( U_ x e. A B ^m A )
Theorem	resixp 7943*	Restriction of an element of an infinite Cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 31-May-2014.)
|- ( ( B C_ A /\ F e. X_ x e. A C ) -> ( F |` B ) e. X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	undifixp 7944*	Union of two projections of a cartesian product. (Contributed by FL, 7-Nov-2011.)
|- ( ( F e. X_ x e. B C /\ G e. X_ x e. ( A \ B ) C /\ B C_ A ) -> ( F u. G ) e. X_ x e. A C )
Theorem	mptelixpg 7945*	Condition for an explicit member of an indexed product. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Jan-2015.)
|- ( I e. V -> ( ( x e. I |-> J ) e. X_ x e. I K <-> A. x e. I J e. K ) )
Theorem	resixpfo 7946*	Restriction of elements of an infinite Cartesian product creates a surjection, if the original Cartesian product is nonempty. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
|- F = ( f e. X_ x e. A C |-> ( f |` B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B C_ A /\ X_ x e. A C =/= (/) ) -> F : X_ x e. A C -onto-> X_ x e. B C )
Theorem	elixpsn 7947*	Membership in a class of singleton functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( F e. X_ x e. { A } B <-> E. y e. B F = { <. A , y >. } ) )
Theorem	ixpsnf1o 7948*	A bijection between a class and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> ( { I } X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( I e. V -> F : A -1-1-onto-> X_ y e. { I } A )
Theorem	mapsnf1o 7949*	A bijection between a set and single-point functions to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- F = ( x e. A |-> ( { I } X. { x } ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ I e. W ) -> F : A -1-1-onto-> ( A ^m { I } ) )
Theorem	boxriin 7950*	A rectangular subset of a rectangular set can be recovered as the relative intersection of single-axis restrictions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A. x e. I A C_ B -> X_ x e. I A = ( X_ x e. I B i^i |^|_ y e. I X_ x e. I if ( x = y , A , B ) ) )
Theorem	boxcutc 7951*	The relative complement of a box set restricted on one axis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ( X e. A /\ A. k e. A C C_ B ) -> ( X_ k e. A B \ X_ k e. A if ( k = X , C , B ) ) = X_ k e. A if ( k = X , ( B \ C ) , B ) )
2.4.23  Equinumerosity
Syntax	cen 7952	Extend class definition to include the equinumerosity relation ("approximately equals" symbol)
class ~~
Syntax	cdom 7953	Extend class definition to include the dominance relation (curly less-than-or-equal)
class ~<_
Syntax	csdm 7954	Extend class definition to include the strict dominance relation (curly less-than)
class ~<
Syntax	cfn 7955	Extend class definition to include the class of all finite sets.
class Fin
Definition	df-en 7956*	Define the equinumerosity relation. Definition of [Enderton] p. 129. We define ~~ to be a binary relation rather than a connective, so its arguments must be sets to be meaningful. This is acceptable because we do not consider equinumerosity for proper classes. We derive the usual definition as bren 7964. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-onto-> y }
Definition	df-dom 7957*	Define the dominance relation. For an alternate definition see dfdom2 7981. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145. Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 7967 and domen 7968. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- ~<_ = { <. x , y >. | E. f f : x -1-1-> y }
Definition	df-sdom 7958	Define the strict dominance relation. Alternate possible definitions are derived as brsdom 7978 and brsdom2 8084. Definition 3 of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- ~< = ( ~<_ \ ~~ )
Definition	df-fin 7959*	Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91, whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to our " a e. Fin". This definition is meaningful whether or not we accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 8538. If we accept Infinity, we can also express A e. Fin by A ~< om (theorem isfinite 8549.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- Fin = { x | E. y e. om x ~~ y }
Theorem	relen 7960	Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~~
Theorem	reldom 7961	Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~<_
Theorem	relsdom 7962	Strict dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- Rel ~<
Theorem	encv 7963	If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) )
Theorem	bren 7964*	Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-onto-> B )
Theorem	brdomg 7965*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B ) )
Theorem	brdomi 7966*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A ~<_ B -> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	brdom 7967*	Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. f f : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	domen 7968*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) )
Theorem	domeng 7969*	Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( A ~<_ B <-> E. x ( A ~~ x /\ x C_ B ) ) )
Theorem	ctex 7970	A countable set is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
|- ( A ~<_ om -> A e. _V )
Theorem	f1oen3g 7971	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 7974 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( F e. V /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1oen2g 7972	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. This variation of f1oeng 7974 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom2g 7973	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This variation of f1domg 7975 does not require the Axiom of Replacement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W /\ F : A -1-1-> B ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	f1oeng 7974	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. C /\ F : A -1-1-onto-> B ) -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1domg 7975	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|- ( B e. C -> ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	f1oen 7976	The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-onto-> B -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	f1dom 7977	The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|- B e. _V   =>    |- ( F : A -1-1-> B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	brsdom 7978	Strict dominance relation, meaning " B is strictly greater in size than A." Definition of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~< B <-> ( A ~<_ B /\ -. A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	isfi 7979*	Express " A is finite." Definition 10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91 (whose " Fin " is a predicate instead of a class). (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|- ( A e. Fin <-> E. x e. om A ~~ x )
Theorem	enssdom 7980	Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|- ~~ C_ ~<_
Theorem	dfdom2 7981	Alternate definition of dominance. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
|- ~<_ = ( ~< u. ~~ )
Theorem	endom 7982	Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|- ( A ~~ B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	sdomdom 7983	Strict dominance implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~< B -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	sdomnen 7984	Strict dominance implies non-equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~< B -> -. A ~~ B )
Theorem	brdom2 7985	Dominance in terms of strict dominance and equinumerosity. Theorem 22(iv) of [Suppes] p. 97. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A ~<_ B <-> ( A ~< B \/ A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	bren2 7986	Equinumerosity expressed in terms of dominance and strict dominance. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.)
|- ( A ~~ B <-> ( A ~<_ B /\ -. A ~< B ) )
Theorem	enrefg 7987	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~~ A )
Theorem	enref 7988	Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A ~~ A
Theorem	eqeng 7989	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A = B -> A ~~ B ) )
Theorem	domrefg 7990	Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. V -> A ~<_ A )
Theorem	en2d 7991*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. _V ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en3d 7992*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. _V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( y e. B -> D e. A ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~~ B )
Theorem	en2i 7993*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. _V )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. _V )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y = C ) <-> ( y e. B /\ x = D ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	en3i 7994*	Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   &    |- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( y e. B -> D e. A )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> ( x = D <-> y = C ) )   =>    |- A ~~ B
Theorem	dom2lem 7995*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( x e. A |-> C ) : A -1-1-> B )
Theorem	dom2d 7996*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( B e. R -> A ~<_ B ) )
Theorem	dom3d 7997*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( x e. A -> C e. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. W )   =>    |- ( ph -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom2 7998*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( B e. V -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	dom3 7999*	A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis) implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. C and D can be read C ( x ) and D ( y ), as can be inferred from their distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|- ( x e. A -> C e. B )   &    |- ( ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) -> ( C = D <-> x = y ) )   =>    |- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> A ~<_ B )
Theorem	idssen 8000	Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|- _I C_ ~~